Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 May;34(5):1171–1175. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1171-1175.1996

Comparison of PCR and microscopic methods for detecting Trypanosoma cruzi.

L V Kirchhoff 1, J R Votava 1, D E Ochs 1, D R Moser 1
PMCID: PMC228976  PMID: 8727897

Abstract

The diagnosis of acute infection with Trypanosoma cruzi, the protozoan parasite that causes Chagas' disease, is generally made by detecting parasites by microscopic examination of fresh blood. Although highly specific, this approach often lacks sensitivity. Several years ago, PCR assays for the detection of T. cruzi were described, but the sensitivities and specificities of these tests have not yet been defined precisely. In the present study, we first compared the sensitivities of PCR methods that differ in sample processing as well as in the target sequences that are amplified. Then, we challenged eight mice with T. cruzi, and on 31 days over a 380-day period, we compared the ability of the PCR method with the highest sensitivity to detect parasites in blood with that of microscopic examination. During the acute phase of the infections, parasites were detected on average 3.9 days earlier by the PCR method than by microscopy. Furthermore, the infected mice were consistently positive by the PCR method during the chronic phase, while parasites were intermittently detected by microscopic examination during that period. Overall, among the 248 comparisons, in 84 the PCR method was positive and no parasites were seen by microscopic examination, whereas the reverse was true in only 1 case, a difference that is highly significant. These findings suggest that this approach should be in patients suspected of having acute Chagas' disease. Moreover, the higher sensitivity of the PCR method observed in both the acute and chronic phases of the T. cruzi infections in the mice that we studied indicates that this approach should be useful in evaluating experimental drugs in T. cruzi-infected laboratory animals.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (467.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avila H. A., Pereira J. B., Thiemann O., De Paiva E., DeGrave W., Morel C. M., Simpson L. Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in blood specimens of chronic chagasic patients by polymerase chain reaction amplification of kinetoplast minicircle DNA: comparison with serology and xenodiagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Sep;31(9):2421–2426. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.9.2421-2426.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avila H. A., Sigman D. S., Cohen L. M., Millikan R. C., Simpson L. Polymerase chain reaction amplification of Trypanosoma cruzi kinetoplast minicircle DNA isolated from whole blood lysates: diagnosis of chronic Chagas' disease. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1991 Oct;48(2):211–221. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(91)90116-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Britto C., Cardoso M. A., Vanni C. M., Hasslocher-Moreno A., Xavier S. S., Oelemann W., Santoro A., Pirmez C., Morel C. M., Wincker P. Polymerase chain reaction detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in human blood samples as a tool for diagnosis and treatment evaluation. Parasitology. 1995 Apr;110(Pt 3):241–247. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000080823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diaz C., Nussenzweig V., Gonzalez A. An improved polymerase chain reaction assay to detect Trypanosoma cruzi in blood. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992 May;46(5):616–623. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1992.46.616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hoft D. F., Lynch R. G., Kirchhoff L. V. Kinetic analysis of antigen-specific immune responses in resistant and susceptible mice during infection with Trypanosoma cruzi. J Immunol. 1993 Dec 15;151(12):7038–7047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kirchhoff L. V. American trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease)--a tropical disease now in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 26;329(9):639–644. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308263290909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kirchhoff L. V., Gam A. A., Gusmao R. A., Goldsmith R. S., Rezende J. M., Rassi A. Increased specificity of serodiagnosis of Chagas' disease by detection of antibody to the 72- and 90-kilodalton glycoproteins of Trypanosoma cruzi. J Infect Dis. 1987 Mar;155(3):561–564. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.3.561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kirchhoff L. V., Hoft D. F. Immunization and challenge of mice with insect-derived metacyclic trypomastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasite Immunol. 1990 Jan;12(1):65–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1990.tb00936.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Otsu K., Donelson J. E., Kirchhoff L. V. Interruption of a Trypanosoma cruzi gene encoding a protein containing 14-amino acid repeats by targeted insertion of the neomycin phosphotransferase gene. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993 Feb;57(2):317–330. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90207-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Postan M., Cheever A. W., Dvorak J. A., McDaniel J. P. A histopathological analysis of the course of myocarditis in C3H/He mice infected with Trypanosoma cruzi clone Sylvio-X10/4. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1986;80(1):50–55. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(86)90193-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rowland E. C., Ritter D. M. Corpus Christi strain-induced protection to Trypanosoma cruzi infection in C3H(He) mice: transfer of resistance to Brazil strain challenge with lymphocytes. J Parasitol. 1984 Oct;70(5):760–766. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Russomando G., Figueredo A., Almirón M., Sakamoto M., Morita K. Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in serum. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2864–2868. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2864-2868.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shadowen R. D., Sciortino C. V. Improved growth of Campylobacter pylori in a biphasic system. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Aug;27(8):1744–1747. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1744-1747.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sturm N. R., Degrave W., Morel C., Simpson L. Sensitive detection and schizodeme classification of Trypanosoma cruzi cells by amplification of kinetoplast minicircle DNA sequences: use in diagnosis of Chagas' disease. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1989 Mar 15;33(3):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(89)90082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wincker P., Britto C., Pereira J. B., Cardoso M. A., Oelemann W., Morel C. M. Use of a simplified polymerase chain reaction procedure to detect Trypanosoma cruzi in blood samples from chronic chagasic patients in a rural endemic area. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994 Dec;51(6):771–777. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1994.51.771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zeledón R., Dias J. C., Brilla-Salazar A., de Rezende J. M., Vargas L. G., Urbina A. Does a spontaneous cure for Chagas' disease exist? Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1988 Jan-Mar;21(1):15–20. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86821988000100003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES