Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 May;34(5):1277–1279. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1277-1279.1996

Comparative susceptibilities of human embryonic fibroblasts and HeLa cells for isolation of human rhinoviruses.

E Arruda 1, C E Crump 1, B S Rollins 1, A Ohlin 1, F G Hayden 1
PMCID: PMC228997  PMID: 8727918

Abstract

The recovery of human rhinovirus (HRV) from nasal washings and nasal and pharyngeal swabs from volunteers with naturally acquired colds was compared in different cell types. Human embryonic lung fibroblast (HELF) strain WI-38 (sensitivity, 61 to 84%) and HeLa-I, an HRV-susceptible HeLa clone (sensitivity, 86 to 94%), were the most sensitive cell types used. HELF-WI-38 cells showed a cytopathic effect earlier than the other cells used, and the different strains of HRV-susceptible HeLa cells varied in their sensitivities for HRV isolation. HRV was detected in a single cell type in 20 to 35% of the positive samples, suggesting that use of a combination of different HRV-susceptible cell lines is the best approach for the recovery of HRV. Although nasal washings tended to yield more HRV isolates than nasal and pharyngeal swabs, the two sampling methods were not found to be significantly different.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (166.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abraham G., Colonno R. J. Many rhinovirus serotypes share the same cellular receptor. J Virol. 1984 Aug;51(2):340–345. doi: 10.1128/jvi.51.2.340-345.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BROWN P. K., TYRRELL D. A. EXPERIMENTS ON THE SENSITIVITY OF STRAINS OF HUMAN FIBROBLASTS TO INFECTION WITH RHINOVIRUSES. Br J Exp Pathol. 1964 Dec;45:571–578. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CATE T. R., COUCH R. B., JOHNSON K. M. STUDIES WITH RHINOVIRUSES IN VOLUNTEERS: PRODUCTION OF ILLNESS, EFFECT OF NATURALLLY ACQUIRED ANTIBODY, AND DEMONSTRATION OF A PROTECTIVE EFFECT NOT ASSOCIATED WITH SERUM ANTIBODY. J Clin Invest. 1964 Jan;43:56–67. doi: 10.1172/JCI104894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooney M. K., Kenny G. E. Demonstration of dual rhinovirus infection in humans by isolation of different serotypes in human heteroploid (HeLa) and human diploid fibroblast cell cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Feb;5(2):202–207. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.2.202-207.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fiala M., Kenny G. E. Enhancement of rhinovirus plaque formation in human heteroploid cell cultures by magnesium and calcium. J Bacteriol. 1966 Dec;92(6):1710–1715. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.6.1710-1715.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fox J. P., Cooney M. K., Hall C. E. The Seattle virus watch. V. Epidemiologic observations of rhinovirus infections, 1965-1969, in families with young children. Am J Epidemiol. 1975 Feb;101(2):122–143. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Geist F. C., Hayden F. G. Comparative susceptibilities of strain MRC-5 human embryonic lung fibroblast cells and the Cooney strain of human fetal tonsil cells for isolation of rhinoviruses from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Sep;22(3):455–456. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.3.455-456.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greve J. M., Davis G., Meyer A. M., Forte C. P., Yost S. C., Marlor C. W., Kamarck M. E., McClelland A. The major human rhinovirus receptor is ICAM-1. Cell. 1989 Mar 10;56(5):839–847. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90688-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HAMPARIAN V. V., LEAGUS M. B., HILLEMAN M. R. ADDITIONAL RHINOVIRUS SEROTYPES. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1964 Aug-Sep;116:976–984. doi: 10.3181/00379727-116-29426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayden F. G., Kaiser D. L., Albrecht J. K. Intranasal recombinant alfa-2b interferon treatment of naturally occurring common colds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Feb;32(2):224–230. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.2.224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee W. M., Monroe S. S., Rueckert R. R. Role of maturation cleavage in infectivity of picornaviruses: activation of an infectosome. J Virol. 1993 Apr;67(4):2110–2122. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.4.2110-2122.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewis F. A., Kennett M. L. Comparison of rhinovirus-sensitive HeLa cells and human embryo fibroblasts for isolation of rhinoviruses from patients with respiratory disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 May;3(5):528–532. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.5.528-532.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Medappa K. C., McLean C., Rueckert R. R. On the structure of rhinovirus 1A. Virology. 1971 May;44(2):259–270. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(71)90258-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ohlin A., Hoover-Litty H., Sanderson G., Paessens A., Johnston S. L., Holgate S. T., Huguenel E., Greve J. M. Spectrum of activity of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 against rhinovirus reference strains and field isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jun;38(6):1413–1415. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.6.1413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmid I., Schmid P., Giorgi J. V. Conversion of logarithmic channel numbers into relative linear fluorescence intensity. Cytometry. 1988 Nov;9(6):533–538. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990090605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sperber S. J., Levine P. A., Sorrentino J. V., Riker D. K., Hayden F. G. Ineffectiveness of recombinant interferon-beta serine nasal drops for prophylaxis of natural colds. J Infect Dis. 1989 Oct;160(4):700–705. doi: 10.1093/infdis/160.4.700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stott E. J., Tyrrell D. A. Some improved techniques for the study of rhinoviruses using HeLa cells. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1968;23(3):236–244. doi: 10.1007/BF01241896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Strizova V., Brown P. K., Head B., Reed S. E. The advantages of HeLa cells for isolation of rhinoviruses. J Med Microbiol. 1974 Nov;7(4):433–438. doi: 10.1099/00222615-7-4-433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES