Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Jul 2;118(2):369–383. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.2.369

Kinetochore microtubules in PTK cells

PMCID: PMC2290046  PMID: 1629239

Abstract

We have analyzed the fine structure of 10 chromosomal fibers from mitotic spindles of PtK1 cells in metaphase and anaphase, using electron microscopy of serial thin sections and computer image processing to follow the trajectories of the component microtubules (MTs) in three dimensions. Most of the kinetochore MTs ran from their kinetochore to the vicinity of the pole, retaining a clustered arrangement over their entire length. This MT bundle was invaded by large numbers of other MTs that were not associated with kinetochores. The invading MTs frequently came close to the kinetochore MTs, but a two-dimensional analysis of neighbor density failed to identify any characteristic spacing between the two MT classes. Unlike the results from neighbor density analyses of interzone MTs, the distributions of spacings between kinetochore MTs and other spindle MTs revealed no evidence for strong MT-MT interactions. A three-dimensional analysis of distances of closest approach between kinetochore MTs and other spindle MTs has, however, shown that the most common distances of closest approach were 30-50 nm, suggesting a weak interaction between kinetochore MTs and their neighbors. The data support the ideas that kinetochore MTs form a mechanical connection between the kinetochore and the pericentriolar material that defines the pole, but that the mechanical interactions between kinetochore MTs and other spindle MTs are weak.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aist J. R., Berns M. W. Mechanics of chromosome separation during mitosis in Fusarium (Fungi imperfecti): new evidence from ultrastructural and laser microbeam experiments. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):446–458. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bajer A. S. Interaction of microtubules and the mechanism of chromosome movement (zipper hypothesis). 1. General principle. Cytobios. 1973 Nov;8(31):139–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cassimeris L., Inoué S., Salmon E. D. Microtubule dynamics in the chromosomal spindle fiber: analysis by fluorescence and high-resolution polarization microscopy. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;10(1-2):185–196. doi: 10.1002/cm.970100123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Euteneuer U., McIntosh J. R. Structural polarity of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):338–345. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fuge H. The three-dimensional architecture of chromosome fibres in the crane fly. II. Amphitelic sex univalents in meiotic anaphase I. Chromosoma. 1985;91(3-4):322–328. doi: 10.1007/BF00328228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gorbsky G. J., Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Microtubule dynamics and chromosome motion visualized in living anaphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1988 Apr;106(4):1185–1192. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.4.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayden J. H., Bowser S. S., Rieder C. L. Kinetochores capture astral microtubules during chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle: direct visualization in live newt lung cells. J Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;111(3):1039–1045. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.3.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heath I. B. Mitosis in the fungus Thraustotheca clavata. J Cell Biol. 1974 Jan;60(1):204–220. doi: 10.1083/jcb.60.1.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hepler P. K., McIntosh J. R., Cleland S. Intermicrotubule bridges in mitotic spindle apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):438–444. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hogan C. J., Cande W. Z. Antiparallel microtubule interactions: spindle formation and anaphase B. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1990;16(2):99–103. doi: 10.1002/cm.970160203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyman A. A. Centrosome movement in the early divisions of Caenorhabditis elegans: a cortical site determining centrosome position. J Cell Biol. 1989 Sep;109(3):1185–1193. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.3.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hyman A. A., Mitchison T. J. Two different microtubule-based motor activities with opposite polarities in kinetochores. Nature. 1991 May 16;351(6323):206–211. doi: 10.1038/351206a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jensen C. G. Dynamics of spindle microtubule organization: kinetochore fiber microtubules of plant endosperm. J Cell Biol. 1982 Feb;92(2):540–558. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.2.540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kirschner M., Mitchison T. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell. 1986 May 9;45(3):329–342. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90318-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leslie R. J., Pickett-Heaps J. D. Ultraviolet microbeam irradiations of mitotic diatoms: investigation of spindle elongation. J Cell Biol. 1983 Feb;96(2):548–561. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.2.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Masuda H., McDonald K. L., Cande W. Z. The mechanism of anaphase spindle elongation: uncoupling of tubulin incorporation and microtubule sliding during in vitro spindle reactivation. J Cell Biol. 1988 Aug;107(2):623–633. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.2.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McDonald K. L., Edwards M. K., McIntosh J. R. Cross-sectional structure of the central mitotic spindle of Diatoma vulgare. Evidence for specific interactions between antiparallel microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1979 Nov;83(2 Pt 1):443–461. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.2.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McDonald K. Osmium ferricyanide fixation improves microfilament preservation and membrane visualization in a variety of animal cell types. J Ultrastruct Res. 1984 Feb;86(2):107–118. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(84)80051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McDonald K., Pickett-Heaps J. D., McIntosh J. R., Tippit D. H. On the mechanism of anaphase spindle elongation in Diatoma vulgare. J Cell Biol. 1977 Aug;74(2):377–388. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.2.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McIntosh J. R., Hering G. E. Spindle fiber action and chromosome movement. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1991;7:403–426. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.002155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mitchison T. J., Kirschner M. W. Properties of the kinetochore in vitro. II. Microtubule capture and ATP-dependent translocation. J Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;101(3):766–777. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.3.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mitchison T. J. Microtubule dynamics and kinetochore function in mitosis. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:527–549. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mitchison T. J. Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence. J Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;109(2):637–652. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.2.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitchison T., Evans L., Schulze E., Kirschner M. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):515–527. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Moore M. J. Removal of glass coverslips from cultures flat embedded in epoxy resins using hydrofluoric acid. J Microsc. 1975 Jul;104(2):205–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb04018.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nicklas R. B., Kubai D. F., Hays T. S. Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1982 Oct;95(1):91–104. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.1.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nicklas R. B., Kubai D. F. Microtubules, chromosome movement, and reorientation after chromosomes are detached from the spindle by micromanipulation. Chromosoma. 1985;92(4):313–324. doi: 10.1007/BF00329815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nicklas R. B. The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:431–449. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.002243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nicklas R. B. The motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase is in or near the kinetochore. J Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;109(5):2245–2255. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.5.2245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Paweletz N. Zur Funktion des "Flemming-Körpers" bei der Teilung tierischer Zellen. Naturwissenschaften. 1967 Oct;54(20):533–535. doi: 10.1007/BF00627210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rieder C. L. Formation of the astral mitotic spindle: ultrastructural basis for the centrosome-kinetochore interaction. Electron Microsc Rev. 1990;3(2):269–300. doi: 10.1016/0892-0354(90)90005-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rieder C. L. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;79:1–58. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61672-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rieder C. L. The structure of the cold-stable kinetochore fiber in metaphase PtK1 cells. Chromosoma. 1981;84(1):145–158. doi: 10.1007/BF00293368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sawin K. E., Mitchison T. J. Poleward microtubule flux mitotic spindles assembled in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;112(5):941–954. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.5.941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sawin K. E., Scholey J. M. Motor proteins in cell division. Trends Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;1(5):122–129. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(91)90117-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Saxton W. M., McIntosh J. R. Interzone microtubule behavior in late anaphase and telophase spindles. J Cell Biol. 1987 Aug;105(2):875–886. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.2.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Scarcello L. A., Janicke M. A., LaFountain J. R., Jr Kinetochore microtubules in crane-fly spermatocytes: untreated, 2 degrees C-treated, and 6 degrees C-grown spindles. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1986;6(4):428–438. doi: 10.1002/cm.970060408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tippit D. H., Pickett-Heaps J. D., Leslie R. Cell division in two large pennate diatoms Hantzschia and Nitzschia III. A new proposal for kinetochore function during prometaphase. J Cell Biol. 1980 Aug;86(2):402–416. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.2.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tippit D. H., Pillus L., Pickett-Heaps J. D. Near-neighbor analysis of spindle microtubules in the alga Ochromonas. Eur J Cell Biol. 1983 Mar;30(1):9–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vorobjev I. A., Nadezhdina E. S. The centrosome and its role in the organization of microtubules. Int Rev Cytol. 1987;106:227–293. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61714-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Witt P. L., Ris H., Borisy G. G. Structure of kinetochore fibers: microtubule continuity and inter-microtubule bridges. Chromosoma. 1981;83(4):523–540. doi: 10.1007/BF00328277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES