Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Jun;34(6):1353–1354. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.6.1353-1354.1996

Recommendation to include OspA and OspB in the new immunoblotting criteria for serodiagnosis of Lyme disease.

E Hilton 1, J Devoti 1, S Sood 1
PMCID: PMC229023  PMID: 8735079

Abstract

In October 1994, the Second National Conference on the Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease recommended a two-step approach to serological testing. The first step was the performance of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); the second step was a confirmatory immunoblot. New criteria for the interpretation of a positive immunoblot were also recommended. The committee decided to omit the 31- and 34-kDa bands (OspA and OspB, respectively) from the choice of bands considered diagnostic for a positive immunoblot. Since we had previously included these in our diagnostic criteria for Lyme disease-positive immunoblots, we reviewed data for all patients attending a Lyme disease center with positive ELISAs and immunoblot assays for Lyme disease from 1 September 1992 to 31 December 1993. The criteria for a positive Western blot (immunoblot) were the presence of 5 or 12 bands, including the 10 recommended by the conference, and the presence of the 31- and 34-kDa protein bands. Of the 136 patients evaluated, 50 were considered to have Lyme disease. Of these 50, 4 (8%) would not have met immunoblot criteria for the diagnosis if the new recommendations were used. Had the 31- and 34-kDa bands been included as part of the diagnostic requirements for immunoblot, these patients would have been included. Although overdiagnosis of Lyme disease appears to be the more frequent problem, our concern is that the exclusion of the 31- and 34-kDa protein bands from the diagnostic criteria may result in the underdiagnosis of Lyme disease by those who would rely too heavily on serological confirmation. The addition of the 31- and 34-kDa bands to those recommended for confirmatory immunoblot should be reconsidered.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (173.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dressler F., Whalen J. A., Reinhardt B. N., Steere A. C. Western blotting in the serodiagnosis of Lyme disease. J Infect Dis. 1993 Feb;167(2):392–400. doi: 10.1093/infdis/167.2.392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kalish R. A., Leong J. M., Steere A. C. Association of treatment-resistant chronic Lyme arthritis with HLA-DR4 and antibody reactivity to OspA and OspB of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 1993 Jul;61(7):2774–2779. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.7.2774-2779.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kalish R. A., Leong J. M., Steere A. C. Early and late antibody responses to full-length and truncated constructs of outer surface protein A of Borrelia burgdorferi in Lyme disease. Infect Immun. 1995 Jun;63(6):2228–2235. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.6.2228-2235.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Magnarelli L. A., Miller J. N., Anderson J. F., Riviere G. R. Cross-reactivity of nonspecific treponemal antibody in serologic tests for Lyme disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1276–1279. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1276-1279.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wilske B., Preac-Mursic V., Schierz G., Busch K. V. Immunochemical and immunological analysis of European Borrelia burgdorferi strains. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1986 Dec;263(1-2):92–102. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(86)80108-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES