Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1993 Dec 2;123(6):1635–1648. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.6.1635

SMC1: an essential yeast gene encoding a putative head-rod-tail protein is required for nuclear division and defines a new ubiquitous protein family

PMCID: PMC2290909  PMID: 8276886

Abstract

The smc1-1 mutant was identified initially as a mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that had an elevated rate of minichromosome nondisjunction. We have cloned the wild-type SMC1 gene. The sequence of the SMC1 gene predicts that its product (Smc1p) is a 141-kD protein, and antibodies against Smc1 protein detect a protein with mobility of 165 kD. Analysis of the primary and putative secondary structure of Smc1p suggests that it contains two central coiled-coil regions flanked by an amino- terminal nucleoside triphosphate (NTP)-binding head and a conserved carboxy-terminal tail. These analyses also indicate that Smc1p is an evolutionary conserved protein and is a member of a new family of proteins ubiquitous among prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The SMC1 gene is essential for viability. Several phenotypic characteristics of the mutant alleles of smc1 gene indicate that its product is involved in some aspects of nuclear metabolism, most likely in chromosome segregation. The smc1-1 and smc1-2 mutants have a dramatic increase in mitotic loss of a chromosome fragment and chromosome III, respectively, but have no increase in mitotic recombination. Depletion of SMC1 function in the ts mutant, smc1-2, causes a dramatic mitosis-related lethality. Smc1p-depleted cells have a defect in nuclear division as evidenced by the absence of anaphase cells. This phenotype of the smc1- 2 mutant is not RAD9 dependent. Based upon the facts that Smc1p is a member of a ubiquitous family, and it is essential for yeast nuclear division, we propose that Smc1p and Smc1p-like proteins function in a fundamental aspect of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cell division.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alani E., Padmore R., Kleckner N. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell. 1990 May 4;61(3):419–436. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90524-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alani E., Subbiah S., Kleckner N. The yeast RAD50 gene encodes a predicted 153-kD protein containing a purine nucleotide-binding domain and two large heptad-repeat regions. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):47–57. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bairoch A. PROSITE: a dictionary of sites and patterns in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 May 11;20 (Suppl):2013–2018. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.suppl.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chou P. Y., Fasman G. D. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1978;47:45–148. doi: 10.1002/9780470122921.ch2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christianson T. W., Sikorski R. S., Dante M., Shero J. H., Hieter P. Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene. 1992 Jan 2;110(1):119–122. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90454-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clarke L., Carbon J. Isolation of a yeast centromere and construction of functional small circular chromosomes. Nature. 1980 Oct 9;287(5782):504–509. doi: 10.1038/287504a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dever T. E., Glynias M. J., Merrick W. C. GTP-binding domain: three consensus sequence elements with distinct spacing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):1814–1818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Doheny K. F., Sorger P. K., Hyman A. A., Tugendreich S., Spencer F., Hieter P. Identification of essential components of the S. cerevisiae kinetochore. Cell. 1993 May 21;73(4):761–774. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90255-O. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Evan G. I., Lewis G. K., Ramsay G., Bishop J. M. Isolation of monoclonal antibodies specific for human c-myc proto-oncogene product. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Dec;5(12):3610–3616. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.12.3610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Falk G., Walker J. E. DNA sequence of a gene cluster coding for subunits of the F0 membrane sector of ATP synthase in Rhodospirillum rubrum. Support for modular evolution of the F1 and F0 sectors. Biochem J. 1988 Aug 15;254(1):109–122. doi: 10.1042/bj2540109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garnier J., Osguthorpe D. J., Robson B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1978 Mar 25;120(1):97–120. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90297-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hagan I., Yanagida M. Novel potential mitotic motor protein encoded by the fission yeast cut7+ gene. Nature. 1990 Oct 11;347(6293):563–566. doi: 10.1038/347563a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hartwell L. H., Smith D. Altered fidelity of mitotic chromosome transmission in cell cycle mutants of S. cerevisiae. Genetics. 1985 Jul;110(3):381–395. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.3.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Henikoff S. Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III creates targeted breakpoints for DNA sequencing. Gene. 1984 Jun;28(3):351–359. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90153-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hennessy K. M., Lee A., Chen E., Botstein D. A group of interacting yeast DNA replication genes. Genes Dev. 1991 Jun;5(6):958–969. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.6.958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hieter P., Mann C., Snyder M., Davis R. W. Mitotic stability of yeast chromosomes: a colony color assay that measures nondisjunction and chromosome loss. Cell. 1985 Feb;40(2):381–392. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Holm C., Stearns T., Botstein D. DNA topoisomerase II must act at mitosis to prevent nondisjunction and chromosome breakage. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Jan;9(1):159–168. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.1.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoyt M. A., Stearns T., Botstein D. Chromosome instability mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that are defective in microtubule-mediated processes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;10(1):223–234. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.1.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Huffaker T. C., Thomas J. H., Botstein D. Diverse effects of beta-tubulin mutations on microtubule formation and function. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;106(6):1997–2010. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.6.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Icho T., Wickner R. B. The MAK11 protein is essential for cell growth and replication of M double-stranded RNA and is apparently a membrane-associated protein. J Biol Chem. 1988 Jan 25;263(3):1467–1475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kilmartin J. V., Adams A. E. Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):922–933. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kilmartin J. V., Wright B., Milstein C. Rat monoclonal antitubulin antibodies derived by using a new nonsecreting rat cell line. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):576–582. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kolodrubetz D. Consensus sequence for HMG1-like DNA binding domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Sep 25;18(18):5565–5565. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.18.5565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Koshland D., Hartwell L. H. The structure of sister minichromosome DNA before anaphase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1987 Dec 18;238(4834):1713–1716. doi: 10.1126/science.3317838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koshland D., Hieter P. Visual assay for chromosome ploidy. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:351–372. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kouprina NYu, Pashina O. B., Nikolaishwili N. T., Tsouladze A. M., Larionov V. L. Genetic control of chromosome stability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1988 Dec;4(4):257–269. doi: 10.1002/yea.320040404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Larionov V. L., Karpova T. S., Kouprina N. Y., Jouravleva G. A. A mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with impaired maintenance of centromeric plasmids. Curr Genet. 1985;10(1):15–20. doi: 10.1007/BF00418488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Larionov V. L., Karpova T. S., Zhouravleva G. A., Pashina O. B., Nikolaishvili N. T., Kouprina N. Y. The stability of chromosomes in yeast. Curr Genet. 1987;11(6-7):435–443. doi: 10.1007/BF00384604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Larionov V. L., Kouprina N. Y., Strunnikov A. V., Vlasov A. V. A direct selection procedure for isolating yeast mutants with an impaired segregation of artificial minichromosomes. Curr Genet. 1989 Jan;15(1):17–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00445747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Longtine M. S., Enomoto S., Finstad S. L., Berman J. Yeast telomere repeat sequence (TRS) improves circular plasmid segregation, and TRS plasmid segregation involves the RAP1 gene product. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 May;12(5):1997–2009. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.5.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lupas A., Van Dyke M., Stock J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science. 1991 May 24;252(5009):1162–1164. doi: 10.1126/science.252.5009.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lynn R. M., Bjornsti M. A., Caron P. R., Wang J. C. Peptide sequencing and site-directed mutagenesis identify tyrosine-727 as the active site tyrosine of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA topoisomerase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(10):3559–3563. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. MacKay V. L., Welch S. K., Insley M. Y., Manney T. R., Holly J., Saari G. C., Parker M. L. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae BAR1 gene encodes an exported protein with homology to pepsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(1):55–59. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maine G. T., Sinha P., Tye B. K. Mutants of S. cerevisiae defective in the maintenance of minichromosomes. Genetics. 1984 Mar;106(3):365–385. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.3.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McGrew J. T., Xiao Z. X., Fitzgerald-Hayes M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in chromosome segregation. Yeast. 1989 Jul-Aug;5(4):271–284. doi: 10.1002/yea.320050407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mortimer R. K., Schild D., Contopoulou C. R., Kans J. A. Genetic map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, edition 10. Yeast. 1989 Sep-Oct;5(5):321–403. doi: 10.1002/yea.320050503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Murray A. W., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Chromosome length controls mitotic chromosome segregation in yeast. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):529–536. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90284-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Murray A. W., Szostak J. W. Construction of artificial chromosomes in yeast. Nature. 1983 Sep 15;305(5931):189–193. doi: 10.1038/305189a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Murray A. W., Szostak J. W. Pedigree analysis of plasmid segregation in yeast. Cell. 1983 Oct;34(3):961–970. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90553-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Niki H., Imamura R., Kitaoka M., Yamanaka K., Ogura T., Hiraga S. E.coli MukB protein involved in chromosome partition forms a homodimer with a rod-and-hinge structure having DNA binding and ATP/GTP binding activities. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(13):5101–5109. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05617.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Notarnicola S. M., McIntosh M. A., Wise K. S. A Mycoplasma hyorhinis protein with sequence similarities to nucleotide-binding enzymes. Gene. 1991 Jan 2;97(1):77–85. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90012-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ohashi A., Gibson J., Gregor I., Schatz G. Import of proteins into mitochondria. The precursor of cytochrome c1 is processed in two steps, one of them heme-dependent. J Biol Chem. 1982 Nov 10;257(21):13042–13047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Palmer R. E., Hogan E., Koshland D. Mitotic transmission of artificial chromosomes in cdc mutants of the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1990 Aug;125(4):763–774. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.4.763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Roth M. B., Gall J. G. Targeting of a chromosomal protein to the nucleus and to lampbrush chromosome loops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb;86(4):1269–1272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rothstein R. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:281–301. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Samejima I., Matsumoto T., Nakaseko Y., Beach D., Yanagida M. Identification of seven new cut genes involved in Schizosaccharomyces pombe mitosis. J Cell Sci. 1993 May;105(Pt 1):135–143. doi: 10.1242/jcs.105.1.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Saunders W. S., Hoyt M. A. Kinesin-related proteins required for structural integrity of the mitotic spindle. Cell. 1992 Aug 7;70(3):451–458. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90169-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shirahige K., Iwasaki T., Rashid M. B., Ogasawara N., Yoshikawa H. Location and characterization of autonomously replicating sequences from chromosome VI of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;13(8):5043–5056. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.8.5043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sikorski R. S., Boeke J. D. In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:302–318. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Srienc F., Bailey J. E., Campbell J. L. Effect of ARS1 mutations on chromosome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Jul;5(7):1676–1684. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.7.1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stinchcomb D. T., Struhl K., Davis R. W. Isolation and characterisation of a yeast chromosomal replicator. Nature. 1979 Nov 1;282(5734):39–43. doi: 10.1038/282039a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Varnum B. C., Ma Q. F., Chi T. H., Fletcher B., Herschman H. R. The TIS11 primary response gene is a member of a gene family that encodes proteins with a highly conserved sequence containing an unusual Cys-His repeat. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;11(3):1754–1758. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.3.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vollrath D., Davis R. W., Connelly C., Hieter P. Physical mapping of large DNA by chromosome fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6027–6031. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):317–322. doi: 10.1126/science.3291120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yen T. J., Li G., Schaar B. T., Szilak I., Cleveland D. W. CENP-E is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis. Nature. 1992 Oct 8;359(6395):536–539. doi: 10.1038/359536a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES