Abstract
A multicenter study was performed to establish the interlaboratory reproducibility of Etest, to provide an additional comparison of Etest MICs with reference broth macrodilution MICs, and to develop some tentative quality control (QC) guidelines for using Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. Two QC strains, Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258, were tested by Etest against amphotericin B, fluconazole, flucytosine, itraconazole, and ketoconazole in each of four laboratories. The QC strains were tested 20 times each against the five antifungal agents by using a common lot of RPMI agar. A total of 80 MICs per drug per strain were generated during the study. Overall, 98 to 100% of the MICs fell within a 3 log2 dilution range for the respective yeast-antifungal agent combinations. The level of agreement of Etest MICs with broth macrodilution MICs was 86 to 100% with amphotericin B (C. krusei and C. parapsilosis), itraconazole (C. krusei and C. parapsilosis), flucytosine (C. parapsilosis), and fluconazole (C. parapsilosis). A lower level of agreement was observed with ketoconazole (C. krusei and C. parapsilosis). Although all participants reported identical Etest MICs, the MICs of flucytosine and fluconazole when tested against C. krusei fell well above the upper limits of the reference range for this strain. The tentative QC limits for the two QC strains and five antifungal agents when tested by the Etest methodology are the same as the QC limits when tested by the reference broth macrodilution method for amphotericin B and C. krusei, itraconazole and C. krusei, flucytosine and C. parapsilosis, fluconazole and C. parapsilosis, and itraconazole and C. parapsilosis. The Etest QC ranges are 1 dilution broader (4-dilution range) than the reference macrodilution method QC ranges for ketoconazole and C. krusei, amphotericin B and C. parapsilosis, and ketoconazole and C. parapsilosis.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (204.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barry A. L., Fuchs P. C., Jones R. N. Statistical criteria for selecting quality control limits for broth microdilution susceptibility tests with 39 different antimicrobial agents. Collaborative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Group. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep-Oct;12(5):413–420. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colombo A. L., Barchiesi F., McGough D. A., Rinaldi M. G. Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for azole antifungal susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Mar;33(3):535–540. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.3.535-540.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Espinel-Ingroff A. Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Aug;19(4):217–220. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Espinel-Ingroff A., Kish C. W., Jr, Kerkering T. M., Fromtling R. A., Bartizal K., Galgiani J. N., Villareal K., Pfaller M. A., Gerarden T., Rinaldi M. G. Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3138–3145. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3138-3145.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Espinel-Ingroff A., Pfaller M., Erwin M. E., Jones R. N. Interlaboratory evaluation of Etest method for testing antifungal susceptibilities of pathogenic yeasts to five antifungal agents by using Casitone agar and solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Apr;34(4):848–852. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.4.848-852.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Bale M., Buschelman B., Lancaster M., Espinel-Ingroff A., Rex J. H., Rinaldi M. G., Cooper C. R., McGinnis M. R. Quality control guidelines for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommended broth macrodilution testing of amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 May;33(5):1104–1107. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1104-1107.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Barry A. L. Evaluation of a novel colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Aug;32(8):1992–1996. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.8.1992-1996.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Messer S. A., Coffmann S. Comparison of visual and spectrophotometric methods of MIC endpoint determinations by using broth microdilution methods to test five antifungal agents, including the new triazole D0870. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 May;33(5):1094–1097. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1094-1097.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rex J. H., Pfaller M. A., Lancaster M., Odds F. C., Bolmström A., Rinaldi M. G. Quality control guidelines for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards--recommended broth macrodilution testing of ketoconazole and itraconazole. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Apr;34(4):816–817. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.4.816-817.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sewell D. L., Pfaller M. A., Barry A. L. Comparison of broth macrodilution, broth microdilution, and E test antifungal susceptibility tests for fluconazole. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2099–2102. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2099-2102.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wanger A., Mills K., Nelson P. W., Rex J. H. Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing: enhanced ability to detect amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Nov;39(11):2520–2522. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.11.2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]