Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Jul;34(7):1779–1783. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.7.1779-1783.1996

Revised approach for identification and detection of ampicillin and vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species by using MicroScan panels.

P C Iwen 1, D M Kelly 1, J Linder 1, S H Hinrichs 1
PMCID: PMC229114  PMID: 8784589

Abstract

The frequency of antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci is increasing, making accurate identification and screening for susceptibility essential. We evaluated the ability of MicroScan Positive Breakpoint Combo Type 6 panels (Dade MicroScan Inc., West Sacramento, Calif.) to identify Enterococcus species and to detect ampicillin and vancomycin resistance. A total of 398 well-characterized Enterococcus isolates from two institutions were inoculated into MicroScan panels, into conventional biochemical assays, and into ampicillin and vancomycin agar dilution media. Resistance was verified by the broth macrodilution method. MicroScan panels accurately detected resistance to ampicillin in 132 of 132 enterococcal isolates, while three isolates for which the MICs were < 16 micrograms/ml were classified incorrectly by MicroScan panels as resistant. No beta-lactamase-producing enterococci were detected. All 64 isolates showing resistance to vancomycin (MICs > or = 32 micrograms/ml) were correctly classified by MicroScan panels. Seven isolates for which the vancomycin MICs were 8 and 16 micrograms/ml were incorrectly classified as susceptible by MicroScan panels, while eight isolates for which the MICs were 4 micrograms/ml were incorrectly labeled as intermediate. Fourteen of these 15 isolates were subsequently identified as motile enterococci. Overall, there were three major errors in susceptibility testing for ampicillin and 15 minor errors for vancomycin. Conventional testing confirmed the identity of 181 Enterococcus faecalis isolates, 157 E. faecium isolates, and 60 isolates of other species; however, 56 of these 60 isolates were misidentified by the MicroScan panels. After recognition of this problem, a revised approach which included tests for pigment, motility, and sucrose fermentation was devised. In combination with these additional assays, the conventional MicroScan panels accurately identified the 56 originally misidentified isolates. In summary, the ability of MicroScan panels to detect vancomycin and ampicillin resistance in enterococci was confirmed. Our study found that the inability of MicroScan panels to identify enterococci other than E. faecalis and E. faecium can be compensated for by the addition of standard assays.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (252.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bryce E. A., Zemcov S. J., Clarke A. M. Species identification and antibiotic resistance patterns of the enterococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Sep;10(9):745–747. doi: 10.1007/BF01972500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buschelman B. J., Bale M. J., Jones R. N. Species identification and determination of high-level aminoglycoside resistance among enterococci. Comparison study of sterile body fluid isolates, 1985-1991. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Feb;16(2):119–122. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90005-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cartwright C. P., Stock F., Fahle G. A., Gill V. J. Comparison of pigment production and motility tests with PCR for reliable identification of intrinsically vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jul;33(7):1931–1933. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1931-1933.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins M. D., Rodrigues U. M., Pigott N. E., Facklam R. R. Enterococcus dispar sp. nov. a new Enterococcus species from human sources. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1991 Mar;12(3):95–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1991.tb00514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donabedian S., Chow J. W., Shlaes D. M., Green M., Zervos M. J. DNA hybridization and contour-clamped homogeneous electric field electrophoresis for identification of enterococci to the species level. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):141–145. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.141-145.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dutka-Malen S., Evers S., Courvalin P. Detection of glycopeptide resistance genotypes and identification to the species level of clinically relevant enterococci by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):24–27. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.24-27.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Facklam R. R., Collins M. D. Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Apr;27(4):731–734. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.4.731-734.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Free L., Sahm D. F. Investigation of the reformulated Remel Synergy Quad plate for detection of high-level aminoglycoside and vancomycin resistance among enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jun;33(6):1643–1645. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1643-1645.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leclercq R., Dutka-Malen S., Duval J., Courvalin P. Vancomycin resistance gene vanC is specific to Enterococcus gallinarum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Sep;36(9):2005–2008. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.9.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Louie M., Simor A. E., Szeto S., Patel M., Kreiswirth B., Low D. E. Susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):41–45. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.41-45.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Montecalvo M. A., Horowitz H., Gedris C., Carbonaro C., Tenover F. C., Issah A., Cook P., Wormser G. P. Outbreak of vancomycin-, ampicillin-, and aminoglycoside-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia in an adult oncology unit. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jun;38(6):1363–1367. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.6.1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Patterson J. E., Sweeney A. H., Simms M., Carley N., Mangi R., Sabetta J., Lyons R. W. An analysis of 110 serious enterococcal infections. Epidemiology, antibiotic susceptibility, and outcome. Medicine (Baltimore) 1995 Jul;74(4):191–200. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199507000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pompei R., Berlutti F., Thaller M. C., Ingianni A., Cortis G., Dainelli B. Enterococcus flavescens sp. nov., a new species of enterococci of clinical origin. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992 Jul;42(3):365–369. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-3-365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ruoff K. L., de la Maza L., Murtagh M. J., Spargo J. D., Ferraro M. J. Species identities of enterococci isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Mar;28(3):435–437. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.3.435-437.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Spera R. V., Jr, Farber B. F. Multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium. An untreatable nosocomial pathogen. Drugs. 1994 Nov;48(5):678–688. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199448050-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Swenson J. M., Clark N. C., Ferraro M. J., Sahm D. F., Doern G., Pfaller M. A., Reller L. B., Weinstein M. P., Zabransky R. J., Tenover F. C. Development of a standardized screening method for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1700–1704. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1700-1704.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tenover F. C., Swenson J. M., O'Hara C. M., Stocker S. A. Ability of commercial and reference antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jun;33(6):1524–1527. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1524-1527.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tenover F. C., Tokars J., Swenson J., Paul S., Spitalny K., Jarvis W. Ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jul;31(7):1695–1699. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1695-1699.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tritz D. M., Iwen P. C., Woods G. L. Evaluation of MicroScan for identification of Enterococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1477–1478. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1477-1478.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vincent S., Knight R. G., Green M., Sahm D. F., Shlaes D. M. Vancomycin susceptibility and identification of motile enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2335–2337. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2335-2337.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Willey B. M., Kreiswirth B. N., Simor A. E., Faur Y., Patel M., Williams G., Low D. E. Identification and characterization of multiple species of vancomycin-resistant enterococci, including an evaluation of Vitek software version 7.1. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2777–2779. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2777-2779.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Willey B. M., Kreiswirth B. N., Simor A. E., Willaims G., Scriver S. R., Phillips A., Low D. E. Detection of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1621–1624. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1621-1624.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zabransky R. J., Dinuzzo A. R., Woods G. L. Detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci by the Alamar MIC system. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):791–793. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.791-793.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES