Abstract
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing expense may be a significant portion of a clinical microbiology laboratory's budget. This study compares the BIOMIC VIDEO system (Giles Scientific, Inc., New York, N.Y.) with the Vitek system (bioMérieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.), an established automated method of antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the ability to generate MIC data. The BIOMIC system is relatively inexpensive and automates the reading of the classical disk agar diffusion test to provide both qualitative (susceptibility interpretation) and quantitative (MIC) data. The overall MIC correlation between the two systems for the 2,913 drug-organism combinations tested was 92.6%. The overall agreement for susceptibility interpretation was 97.4%. The BIOMIC system offers a 57.4% savings per test over the Vitek system. The BIOMIC system utilizes an older technology which is more efficient and yet yields results comparable to those of established automated MIC methods. The savings achievable in laboratories and hospitals nationwide may contribute significantly to the containment of national health care expenditures.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (211.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Backes B. A., Cavalieri S. J., Rudrik J. T., Britt E. M. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative clinical isolates with the AutoMicrobic system. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):744–747. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.744-747.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barry A. L., Thornsberry C., Badal R. E., Baker C. N., Jones R. N., Gerlach E. H. Piperacillin susceptibility tests by the single-disk agar diffusion technique. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Sep;16(3):378–385. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.3.378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D'Amato R. F., Hochstein L., Vernaleo J. R., Cleri D. J., Wallman A. A., Gradus M. S., Thornsberry C. Evaluation of the BIOGRAM antimicrobial susceptibility test system. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Nov;22(5):793–798. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.5.793-798.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen S. L., Freedy P. K. Concurrent comparability of automated systems and commercially prepared microdilution trays for susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):878–886. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.5.878-886.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novak S. M., Hindler J., Bruckner D. A. Reliability of two novel methods, Alamar and E test, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):3056–3057. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.3056-3057.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sautter R. L., Denys G. A. Comparison of BIOGRAM and commercial microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Feb;25(2):301–304. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.2.301-304.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams A. C. Health care plans covering outpatient x-rays and lab tests. Mon Labor Rev. 1993 Aug;116(8):44–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]