Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 12;336(7648):800–802. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39525.442674.AD

Table 1.

Frequency and accessibility of sites related to suicide from searches using 12 different search terms in four search engines

Type of site No (%) of hits (n=480) Median rank score* No (%) of times ranked first (n=48) No (%) of times ranked 1-3 (n=144)
All dedicated suicide sites: 90 (19) 5 12 (25) 32 (22)
 Pro-suicide; encourage, promote, or facilitate 45 (9) 4 9 (19) 22 (15)
 Describe methods but do not encourage 43 (9) 5 2 (4) 9 (6)
 Portray suicide in fashionable terms 2 (0.4) 5 1 (2) 1 (1)
All information sites: 44 (9) 4.5 13 (27) 18 (13)
 Factual information about suicide methods 24 (5) 3.5 9 (19) 12 (8)
 Partly joking/tongue in cheek information but suggestive of real methods 12 (3) 7.5 2 (4) 3 (2)
Completely joking information: most or all methods described not real 8 (2) 5.5 2 (4) 3 (2)
Against suicide sites 59 (12) 5 4 (8) 17 (12)
Prevention or support sites 62 (13) 5 6 (13) 21 (15)
Academic or policy sites 70 (15) 7 1 (2) 14 (10)
Page not found or not relevant to search term 88 (18) 5.5 10 (21) 28 (19)
News reports of individual suicides 12 (3) 7.5 1 (2) 3 (2)
Chat rooms focused on suicide methods 12 (3) 6 1 (2) 3 (2)
Chat rooms discussing various general issues relating to suicide 8 (2) 4.5 0 4 (3)
Miscellaneous sites reporting on topical issues relating to suicide 35 (7) 7 0 5 (3)

* Median scores differed depending on the nature of the site (Kruskall-Wallis P=0.007).