Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 2008 Apr 12;336(7648):789. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39542.514745.3A

Time for the single researcher impact factor

Gianluca Castelnuovo 1
PMCID: PMC2292290  PMID: 18403509

It is indeed time to consider alternatives for the “impact factor” algorithm.1 For example, it might be more useful to consider the merits and contributions of all the scientific activities of each single researcher instead of measuring only the impact factor numbers. For example, as reported in a recent debate in Science about peer reviewers’ responsibilities,2 writing and finalising an article is a complex process in which reviewers offer a crucial scientific contribution. One possible solution is to create a new index, the single researcher impact factor, which can take into account the number and quality of traditional publications and other activities such as reviewing manuscripts.

Some experimental versions of this new index are under evaluation. The single researcher centred impact factor will ensure that the evaluation of individual scientific impact in the community will be more accurate and could better motivate researchers to review (without frustration), publish, and share their ideas.

Competing interests: None declared.

The other authors of this letter are Elena Faccio, Gian P Turchi, Alessandro Salvini, Enrico Molinari, and Antonio Imbasciati.

References


Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES