Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Sep;34(9):2304–2306. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.9.2304-2306.1996

Isolation of Campylobacter concisus from feces of children with and without diarrhea.

R Van Etterijck 1, J Breynaert 1, H Revets 1, T Devreker 1, Y Vandenplas 1, P Vandamme 1, S Lauwers 1
PMCID: PMC229239  PMID: 8862606

Abstract

A prospective study compared fecal isolation rates of Campylobacter concisus for children with diarrhea and without diarrhea by a filter technique in which media were incubated for 4 days in a microaerobic atmosphere. No statistically significant difference in isolation rates was found (13.2% in patients with diarrhea and 9% in controls). Moreover, 35 of 37 children attending the same day care center harbored different C. concisus strains, as was demonstrated by arbitrary primer PCR DNA fingerprinting. These data suggest a lack of a pathogenic role for C. concisus in enteritis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (272.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Figura N., Guglielmetti P., Zanchi A., Partini N., Armellini D., Bayeli P. F., Bugnoli M., Verdiani S. Two cases of Campylobacter mucosalis enteritis in children. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Mar;31(3):727–728. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.3.727-728.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnson C. C., Finegold S. M. Uncommonly encountered, motile, anaerobic gram-negative bacilli associated with infection. Rev Infect Dis. 1987 Nov-Dec;9(6):1150–1162. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.6.1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kamma J. J., Nakou M., Manti F. A. Microbiota of rapidly progressive periodontitis lesions in association with clinical parameters. J Periodontol. 1994 Nov;65(11):1073–1078. doi: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.11.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Moore W. E., Holdeman L. V., Cato E. P., Smibert R. M., Burmeister J. A., Palcanis K. G., Ranney R. R. Comparative bacteriology of juvenile periodontitis. Infect Immun. 1985 May;48(2):507–519. doi: 10.1128/iai.48.2.507-519.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. On S. L. Confirmation of human Campylobacter concisus isolates misidentified as Campylobacter mucosalis and suggestions for improved differentiation between the two species. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2305–2306. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2305-2306.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Penner J. L. The genus Campylobacter: a decade of progress. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Apr;1(2):157–172. doi: 10.1128/cmr.1.2.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Steele T. W., McDermott S. N. The use of membrane filters applied directly to the surface of agar plates for the isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from feces. Pathology. 1984 Jul;16(3):263–265. doi: 10.3109/00313028409068535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tanner A. C. Characterization of Wolinella spp., Campylobacter concisus, Bacteroides gracilis, and Eikenella corrodens by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Oct;24(4):562–565. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.4.562-565.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tanner A. C., Haffer C., Bratthall G. T., Visconti R. A., Socransky S. S. A study of the bacteria associated with advancing periodontitis in man. J Clin Periodontol. 1979 Oct;6(5):278–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1979.tb01931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vandamme P., Falsen E., Pot B., Hoste B., Kersters K., De Ley J. Identification of EF group 22 campylobacters from gastroenteritis cases as Campylobacter concisus. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Aug;27(8):1775–1781. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1775-1781.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vandamme P., Goossens H. Taxonomy of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, and Helicobacter: a review. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1992 Apr;276(4):447–472. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80671-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang G., Whittam T. S., Berg C. M., Berg D. E. RAPD (arbitrary primer) PCR is more sensitive than multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for distinguishing related bacterial strains. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Dec 25;21(25):5930–5933. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.25.5930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES