Abstract
Idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis (IHCP) is a rare clinical entity, characterized by a chronic inflammation causing thickening of the dura. Adequate therapeutic management is still a matter of debate. We present a patient with an IHCP, non-responsive to corticotherapy. Oral methotrexate was introduced (12.5 mg weekly) and total remission was observed after 6 weeks, both clinically and after neuro-imaging. We conclude that methotrexate can be effective and a therapeutical option in patients with IHCP who are resistant to corticotherapy or present major side-effects of chronic corticosteroids use.
Introduction
Hypertrophic pachymeningitis (HP) is a rare clinical entity of diverse aetiology causing thickening of the dura. It was first described by Charcot and Joffroy regarding spinal meninges in 1869. These early reports of hypertrophic pachymeningitis were related to tuberculosis or syphilis [1]. Naffziger described the first case of idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis (IHCP) [2].
Compression of anatomic structures by the meninx, thickened by inflammatory infiltration is the most important cause of the clinical features. These include headache, cranial nerve palsies and ataxia [3–9].
Several other causes have been recognized, including infections, autoimmune disorders and neoplasms. When an exhaustive evaluation fails to reveal a cause, IHCP is considered. IHCP is a very rare disorder that affects predomininantly male patients. Adequate therapeutic management is still a matter of debate. Several therapeutic strategies have been proposed, including steroids and other immunosuppressive agents, as well as radiotherapy and surgical removal of the affected tissue [10].
In this case report, we present a patient with an IHCP and his responsiveness to oral methotrexate.
Case report
A 62-year-old male consulted in 2002 about a bi-temporal, non-throbbing headache, jaw claudication and diffuse articular pains. He described episodes of transitory hemianopsia. Neurological examination showed no signs of focalisation. He had no history of clinical signs or symptoms of systemic collagen vascular disease, syphilis, tuberculosis or obvious metastatic cancer. Laboratory test showed an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 91 mm and a C-reactive protein of 104 mg l−1 (normal < 3.2 mg l−1). Brain MRI study and biopsies of both temporal arteries were negative. After introduction of oral corticotherapy (prednisone 1 mg kg−1 day−1) an immediate (less than 24 h) and total remission was observed. His neurologist concluded the disease as a giant cell arteritis. In the following years, multiple attempts were made by his physician to reduce his corticotherapy. With daily doses of less than 30 mg the headache and the inflammatory syndrome reappeared.
A few months before his admission to our hospital the patient presented with recurring headaches, different from the headaches of 2002. He described intense occipital, non-throbbing headaches and cervical pain. The inflammatory syndrome worsened (ESR 100 mm). This exacerbation was accompanied by a lingual hypoesthesia and an important photophobia. Attempts to control this aggravation by intensifying his corticotherapy (80 mg daily) were unsuccessful.
He was admitted in our hospital in November 2005. At this time neurological examination showed a 4th, 5th and 12th left cranial nerve paresis and paresthesia of the left leg. The rest of the clinical examination was normal. Opthalmologic examination showed glaucoma as a complication of his chronic corticotherapy. Blood analysis revealed an ESR of 60 mm and a C-reactive protein level of 55 mg l−1. Brain MRI revealed a diffuse thickening and enhancement of the pachymeninges along both sides of the tentorium (Fig. 1).
All known causes of pachymeningitis were explored. Blood analyses of rheumatoid factor, complement activation, antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), antinuclear antibodies and tumour markers were normal. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses revealed discrete pleiocytosis (white blood cell count 23 mm−3 and elevated protein levels 1.33 g l−1, normal value 0.6–1 g l−1) but the virologic, parasitologic and bacteriologic analyses were negative. PCR assay for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA was negative. Carcinomatous cells were not detected in two CSF samples. Angiotensin converting enzyme was slightly elevated (2.2 UI L−1, interval 0.5–1.50). Chest CT and MRI, bronchial fibroscopy with biopsy, gallium scintigraphy, neurophysiologic explorations presented no arguments for a systemic disease. Investigation for a neoplasia (tumour markers, chest and abdominal CT and bone scintigraphy) was negative. C-reactive protein continued to rise (115 mg L−1) and a significant worsening of the patient’s general condition was noted with a weight loss of 8 kg in 3 months. A control MRI study confirmed the worsening of the diffuse thickening of the dura (Fig. 2).
A meningeal biopsy was performed which showed an inflammatory infiltration, locally granulomatous but non-specific. No signs of vasculitis, neoplastic cells or infectious agents were found.
With these exhaustive clinical and para-clinical investigations being negative, we concluded at an IHCP. At that moment the patient was still treated with 60 mg of prednisone daily.
Because of his resistance to chronic steroid therapy, IV methylprednisone was administered (1 g day−1 for 3 days) and oral methotrexate 12.5 mg weekly was started. Total remission of the clinical and biologic abnormalities was evident 6 weeks after introduction of methotrexate as long as there was a progressive reduction of corticotherapy. He regained 7 kg in the following weeks. No side effects were noted. A control MRI study, performed 6 weeks after introduction of methotrexate, demonstrated a practically total abolition of the dural enhancement (Fig. 3).
Currently, after 10 months of follow-up (after introduction of methotrexate), the patient is doing well and his corticotherapy is continually reduced. He recovered for his glaucoma and had no side effects for methotrexate. He currently takes 15 mg of oral methotrexate weekly and 12.5 mg cortisone daily and continues to reduce his corticotherapy. ESR and C-reactive protein remain normal. However he continues to describe facial paresthesias. Our therapeutic strategy is to lower the cortisone dosage until 10 mg daily and after a stable condition (clinically and biologically) of minimum 6 months, we will try to lower the methotrexate dosage.
Discussion
Our patient presented with IHCP, which was confirmed by neuroimaging and biopsy, and which improved with the association of corticosteroids and methotrexate. Since the introduction of CT and MRI, IHCP has been increasingly reported in recent literature. The clinical picture can be heterogeneous. Parney et al. [11] described headache, cranial nerve palsy and ataxia in 88, 62 and 32% of the cases, respectively. Cranial nerve palsies are due to compression of the exit zone of the nerve roots by the hypertrophic basal pachymeningitis. Riku and kato [12] described two patterns of the multiple cranial neuropathies depending on the site of dural inflammation: cavernous sinus to superior orbital fissure involvement and falcotentorial to posterior fossa dural involvement. The headache is probably related to the dural inflammation because in many cases no evidence of raised intracranial pressure was present. Recently, the headache profile was described by Wang et al. [13] and characterized as a chronic daily headache, often resembling chronic migraine. Our patient also described daily headache, but the headache did not resemble chronic migraine. Rarely, IHCP has been reported to lead to internal carotid artery occlusion, venous sinus occlusion and obstructive hydrocephalus [14–18].
Hypertrophic pachymeningitis can be divided into two types: secondary, in which there is an identifiable coexisting cause and idiopathic, in which no identifiable cause, as in our patient. IHCP is thus a diagnosis of exclusion. Differential diagnoses are extensive. In our case, we performed a diagnostic work-up based on all known causes in current literature [10]. Most authors consider intracranial hypotension, infections, systemic autoimmune disorders, malignancy and meningioma as the main aetiologies of enhanced dura mater on gadolinium MRI.
Although by definition no cause is found for IHCP, different abnormalities are described. In a series of 12 patients, Kupersmith et al. described an elevated ESR in 41%. The chemistry of CSF was variable and non-diagnostic, but protein was elevated in 50% of their patients. They recommend biopsy of the dura when the patient clinically deteriorates or the neuro-imaging worsens, despite treatment [10]. Until now the pathogenesis of IHCP remains unclear. The close relationship to autoimmune disorders such as Wegner’s granulomatosis, rheumatoid arthritis or other connective tissue diseases has been described. Recently p-ANCA positive HP has been reported. As p-ANCA antibodies have been detected in many vasculitides, microvasculitis may be involved in some cases of IHCP [19].
Neuroimaging plays a key role in the evaluation of IHCP. Nevertheless, image study of IHCP can remain negative for 2 years before there is any significant finding [20]. The MR images show a diffusely thickened dura, usually isointense on T1-weighted slices that enhances strongly after paramagnetic contrast injection due to an inflammatory reaction of the pachymeninges. On T2-weighted imaging, the dura appears commonly hyperintense, rarely hypointense related to fibrosis process. The use of gadolinium is important for the evaluation of the pattern of meningeal enhancement that may differentiate between pachy- and lepto-meningitis. MRI can also demonstrate areas suitable for biopsy. In our case, the MRI was normal in the beginning. Although there was an evident change in symptomatology of disease progression, the possibility remains that the symptoms diagnosed as a giant cell arteritis in 2002 was the initial presentation of an occult IHCP.
As mentioned above, the role of the dural biopsy is important in the diagnostic process but even more important is to exclude other causes of HP. Taken into account the high number of relapses reported in literature, biopsy in an early disease stage must be discussed. Non-specific inflammatory changes in the dura are common histopathologic features. Vasculitis or granulomatous changes have been described as well [19].
In our case report angiotensin converting enzyme levels in CSF were elevated and although no other argument was found, neurosarcoidosis must be discussed in our patient. Although the biopsy performed in our patient did not find elements in favour of neurosarcoidosis, we must admit that chronic immunosuppressive therapy can mask the results.
In recent literature there is no consensus on the adequate management of IHCP. Spontaneous resolution of both clinical symptoms and signs, and dural thickening has been reported [21]. A variety of therapeutic approaches have been tried alone or in combination. Corticosteroid therapy is often effective in ameliorating the symptoms and signs, and in stopping the disease progression [22]. In those who do not respond to steroids or those who develop steroid dependence, other immunosuppressive therapies have been used [23].
Most authors agree that corticotherapy should be the first approach in IHCP. Some authors describe only a partial effectiveness of corticosteroid therapy, with partial clinical improvement and relapse when tapering the dosage [10]. Table 1 gives an overview of the therapeutic trials since 1990. Searching the pubmed database in the English-language literature for patients with IHCP receiving treatment, we identified a total of 60 patients. The most frequently used treatment was steroid therapy (n = 56, 93%). Thirty-nine patients were treated with corticosteroids as monotherapy (65%). In this subgroup,18 patients experienced relapses (46%). Different add-on therapeutic options are proposed; six patients received azathioprine, one patient cyclophosphamide, one patient underwent surgery and two patients were treated with methotrexate. In all these patients receiving add-on therapy, a sustained remission was described, permitting to stop or reduce the daily dose of corticosteroids. Considering occult tuberculosis, one patient was empirically treated with antitubercular medication as monotherapy. Surgical excision is sometimes necessary for patients with mass effect due to thickening of the skull base [19]. Symptomatic hydrocephalus sometimes requires ventriculoperitoneal shunting. In the identified patient group, five were operated, one after therapeutic failure of the corticotherapy. Recently the use of low-dose pulse subcutaneous methotrexate was proposed as monotherapy. Total remission of the clinical and neuro-imaging abnormalities was evident after 6 months [24–32].
Table 1.
Author | PY | N | Treatment | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hamilton et al. [24] | 1993 | 3 | Corticosteroid + Aza (N = 2) | Remission with after addition Aza |
Mtx + chloroquine (N = 1) | No improvement with Mtx | |||
Remission after addition chloroquine | ||||
Masson et al. [25] | 1993 | 7 | Corticosteroid (N = 4) | Improvement but corticodependent |
Radiotherapy (N = 1) | No lasting improvement | |||
Corticotherapy + Aza (N = 1) | Permitting lowering of corticotherapy after introduction of Aza | |||
Botella et al. [26] | 1994 | 1 | Surgery | Temporary relief |
Parney et al. [11] | 1997 | 1 | Antituberculous therapy | Total remission |
Nishioka et al. [27] | 1998 | 1 | Corticotherapy | Relapse |
Hatano et al. [23] | 1999 | 6 | Corticotherapy (N = 4) | Three sustained remissions |
Surgery + corticotherapy (N = 1) | Three relapses | |||
Corticotherapy + cyclophosphamide (N = 1) | ||||
Yamamoto et al. [28] | 2000 | 1 | Corticotherapy | Remission after lymphocytapheresis |
Lymphocytapheresis | ||||
Dumont et al. [29] | 2000 | 2 | One corticotherapy | Sustained remission |
One surgery | Sustained remission | |||
Sylaja et al. [3] | 2002 | 4 | Four corticotherapy | One complete remission |
Three partial remission | ||||
Lee et al. [5] | 2003 | 1 | Surgery | Remission |
Riku et al. [12] | 2003 | 14 | Thirteen corticotherapy | Relapses in 7 patients |
One corticotherapy + Aza | Long-term improvement | |||
One surgery | ||||
Kupersmith et al. [10] | 2004 | 12 | Twelve corticotherapy | Relapses in 6 patients |
Two corticotherapy + Mtx | Reduction of corticotherapy | |||
Two corticotherapy + Aza | Reduction of corticotherapy | |||
Rossi et al. [30] | 2004 | 4 | Corticotherapy | Three remission |
One relapse | ||||
Kanemoto et al. [31] | 2005 | 1 | Corticotherapy | Remission |
Ruiz et al. [32] | 2006 | 1 | Subcutanous methotrexate | Total remission |
Rudnik et al. [33] | 2007 | 1 | Corticotherapy | Remission |
PY publication year, N number of patients, Aza azathioprine, Mtx methotrexate
In our patient we chose a low-pulse oral methotrexate scheme of 12.5 mg weekly. Although, large randomized trials are required to prove the efficacy and tolerability of methotrexate at different doses and routes of administration, we noted a spectacular improvement within the 6 weeks following introduction of methotrexate. After introduction of methotrexate we were able to taper the corticotherapy and reduce the side-effects of its chronic use (glaucoma). There is no consensus about the duration of this therapy. After minimum 12 months we will try to stop the methotrexate.
Conclusion
In this patient with an IHCP, methotrexate was a safe and effective treatment, resulting in a total remission after 6 weeks and allowing to reduce corticotherapy. In patients with IHCP which is non-responsive to corticotherapy, or in patients who present major side-effects of their chronic use of corticosteroids, methotrexate seems indicated. However further work is required to determine the place of oral methotrexate in the therapeutic management of IHCP.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
References
- 1.Charcot JM, Joffroy A (1869) Deux cas d’athrophie musculaire progressive avec lésions de la substance gris et des faisceaux antériolatéraux de la melle épinière. Arch Physiol Norm Pathol 2:354–367, 629–649, 744–769
- 2.Naffziger HC, Stern WE (1949) Chronic pachymeningitis: report of a case and review of the literature. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 62:383–411 [PubMed]
- 3.Sylaja PN, Cherian PJ, Das CK, Radhakrishnan VV, Radhakrishnan K (2002) Idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis. Neurol India 50:53–59 [PubMed]
- 4.D’Andrea G, Trillo G, Celli P, Roperto R, Crispo F, Ferrante L (2004) Idiopathic intracranial hypertrophic pachymeningitis: two case reports and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 27:199–204 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Lee YC, Cueng YC, Hsu SW, Lui CC (2003) Idiopathic Hypertrophic Cranial pachymeningitis: Case report with 7 years of imaging follow-up. AJNR 24:119–123 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Misra UK, Kalita J (2002) Idiopathic Hyperthophic Pachymeningitis: Easy to Suspect, Difficult to prove. Neurol India 50:4–5 [PubMed]
- 7.Prabhakar S, Bhatia R, Lai V, Singh P (2002) Hypertrophic pachymeningitis: varied manifestations of a single disease entity. Neurol India 50:45–52 [PubMed]
- 8.De Deus-Silva L, de Queiroz LS, Zanardi Vd Vde A, Ghizone E, da Pereire HC, Malveira GL, Pirani C Jr, Damasceno BP, Cendes F (2003) Hypertrophic pachymeningitis: case report. Arq Neuropsyquiatr 61:107–111 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9.Bang OY, Kim DI, Yoon SR, Choi IS (1998) Idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningeal lesions: correlation between clinical patterns and neuroimaging characteristics. Eur Neurol 39:49–56 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 10.Kupersmith MJ, Martin V, Heller G, Shah A, Mitnick HJ (2004) Idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningitis. Neurology 62:686–694 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Parney IF, Johnson ES, Allen PB (1997) Idiopathic cranial hypertrophic pachymeningitis responsive to antituberculous therapy: a case report. Neurosurgery 41:965–971 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12.Riku S, Kato S (2003) Idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningitis. Neuropathology 23:335–344 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 13.Wang YJ, Fuh JL, Lirng JF, Lu SR, Wang SJ (2004) Headache profile in patients with idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis. Headache 44:916–923 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 14.Fain O, Seror O, Wirth JF, Heron C, Mathieu E, Chamouard JM, Guillevin L, Thomas M (1999) Les pachyméningites crâniennes. Rev Méd Interne 20:234–246 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Lam BL, Barrett DA, Glaser JS, Schatz NJ, Brown HH (1994) Visual loss from idiopathic intracranial pachymeningitis. Neurology 44:694–698 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Willing SJ, Broghamer W (1992) Internal carotid artery occlusion due to idiopathic cranial pachymeningitis. AJNR 13:1594–1596 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Oku T, Yamashita M, Inoue T, Sayama T, Kodama T, Nagatomi H, Wakisake S (1995) A case of posterior fossa hypertrophic pachymeningitis with hydrocephalus. No To Shinkei 47:569–573 [PubMed]
- 18.Eguchi K, Kodama Y, Hotta T, et al (1996) A case of cranial hypertrophic pachymeningitis with intracranial haemorrhage. No To Shinkei 48:475–480 [PubMed]
- 19.Takuma H, Shimada H, Inoue Y, Ishimura E, Himuro K, Miki T, Nishizawa (2001) Hypertrophic pachymeningitis with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (p-ANCA), and diabetes insipidus. Acta Neurol Scand 104:397–401 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Mamelak AN, Kelly WM, Davis RL, Rosenblum ML (1993) Idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 79:270–276 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.11Nishio S, Morioka T, Togawa A, Yanase T, Nawata H, Fukui M, Hasuo K (1995) Spontaneous resolution of hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis. Neurosurg Rev 18:201–204 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 22.Tanaka M, Suda M, Ishikawa Y, Fujitake J, Fujii H, Tatsuoka Y (1996) Idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis associated with hydrocephalus and myocarditis: Remarkable steroid induced remission of hypertrophic duramater. Neurology 46:554–556 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 23.Hatano N, Behari S, Nagatani T, Kimura M, Ooka K, Saito K, Yoshida J (1999) Idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis: clinicoradiological spectrum and therapeutic options. Neurosurgery 45:1336–1342 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 24.Hamilton SF, Smith Ch, Lessell S (1993) Idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis. J Clin Neuroophthalmol 13:127–134 [PubMed]
- 25.Masson C, Henin D, Hauw JJ, Rey A, Raverdy P, Masson M (1993) Cranial pachymeningitis of unknown origin: A study of seven cases. Neurology 43:1329–1334 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Botella C, Orozco M, Navarro J, Riesgo P (1994) Idiopathic chronic hypertrophic craniocervical pachyemeningitis: case report. Neurosurgery 35(6):1144–1149 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Nishioka H, Ito H, Haraoka J, Takahashi M, Shinmura F (1998) Idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis of the cavernous sinus mimicking lymphocytic hypophysitis. Neurol Med Chir 36(6):377–382 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28.Yamamoto T, Goto K, Suzuki A, Nakamura N, Mizuno Y (2000) Long-term improvement of idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis by lymphocytapheresis. Ther Apher 4(4):313–316 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Dumont AS, Clark AW, Sevick RJ, Myles ST (2000) Idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningitis: a report of two patients and review of the literature. Can J Neurol Sci 27(4):333–340 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 30.Rossi S, Giannini F, Cerase A, Bartalini S, Tripodi S, Volpi N, Vatti G, Passero S, Galluzi P, Ulivelli M (2004) Uncommon findings in idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis. J Neurol 251(5):548–555 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Kanemoto M, Ota Y, Karahashi T, Nozue N (2005) A case of idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis manifested only by positive rheumatoid factor and abnormal findings of the anterior falx. Rheumatol Int 25(3):230–233 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Ruiz-Sandoval JL, Bernard-Medina H, Ramos-Gomez EJ, Romero-Vargas S, Gutierrez-Urena S, Gonzalez-Cornejo S, Chiquete E (2006) Idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis succesfully treated with weekly subcutaneous methotrexate. Acta Neurochir 148:1011–1014 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.1Rudnik A, Larysz D, Gamrot J, Rudnik A, Skorupa A, Bierzynska-macyszyn G, Bazowski P (2007) Idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningitis—case report and literature review. Folia Neuropathol 45(1):36–42 [PubMed]