Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Oct;34(10):2522–2525. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.10.2522-2525.1996

Reliability of nucleic acid amplification for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an international collaborative quality control study among 30 laboratories.

G T Noordhoek 1, J D van Embden 1, A H Kolk 1
PMCID: PMC229309  PMID: 8880513

Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens is increasingly used as a laboratory tool for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. However, the specificity and sensitivity of these tests may be questioned, and no standardized reagents for quality control assessment are available. To estimate the performance of amplification tests for routine diagnosis, we initiated an interlaboratory study involving 30 laboratories in 18 countries. We prepared blinded panels of 20 sputum samples containing no, 100, or 1,000 mycobacterial cells. Each laboratory was asked to detect M. tuberculosis by their routine method of nucleic acid amplification. Only five laboratories correctly identified the presence or absence of mycobacterial DNA in all 20 samples. Seven laboratories detected mycobacterial DNA in all positive samples, and 13 laboratories correctly reported the absence of DNA in the negative samples. Lack of specificity was more of a problem than lack of sensitivity. Reliability was not found to be associated with the use of any particular method. Reliable detection of M. tuberculosis in clinical samples by nucleic acid amplification techniques is possible, but many laboratories do not use adequate quality controls. This study underlines the need for good laboratory practice and reference reagents to monitor the performance of the whole assay, including pretreatment of clinical samples.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (160.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bootman J. S., Kitchin P. A. Reference preparations in the standardisation of HIV-1 PCR--an international collaborative study. J Virol Methods. 1994 Aug;49(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(94)90050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eisenach K. D., Sifford M. D., Cave M. D., Bates J. H., Crawford J. T. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Nov;144(5):1160–1163. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.5.1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grosset J., Mouton Y. Is PCR a useful tool for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in 1995? Tuber Lung Dis. 1995 Jun;76(3):183–184. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8479(05)80001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kolk A. H., Noordhoek G. T., de Leeuw O., Kuijper S., van Embden J. D. Mycobacterium smegmatis strain for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by PCR used as internal control for inhibition of amplification and for quantification of bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1354–1356. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1354-1356.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kolk A. H., Schuitema A. R., Kuijper S., van Leeuwen J., Hermans P. W., van Embden J. D., Hartskeerl R. A. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by using polymerase chain reaction and a nonradioactive detection system. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2567–2575. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2567-2575.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kox L. F., Rhienthong D., Miranda A. M., Udomsantisuk N., Ellis K., van Leeuwen J., van Heusden S., Kuijper S., Kolk A. H. A more reliable PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Mar;32(3):672–678. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.3.672-678.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Noordhoek G. T., Kolk A. H., Bjune G., Catty D., Dale J. W., Fine P. E., Godfrey-Faussett P., Cho S. N., Shinnick T., Svenson S. B. Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind comparison study among seven laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):277–284. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.277-284.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Noordhoek G. T., van Embden J. D., Kolk A. H. Questionable reliability of the polymerase chain reaction in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):2036–2036. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Quint W. G., Heijtink R. A., Schirm J., Gerlich W. H., Niesters H. G. Reliability of methods for hepatitis B virus DNA detection. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):225–228. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.225-228.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zaaijer H. L., Cuypers H. T., Reesink H. W., Winkel I. N., Gerken G., Lelie P. N. Reliability of polymerase chain reaction for detection of hepatitis C virus. Lancet. 1993 Mar 20;341(8847):722–724. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90488-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. deWit D., Wootton M., Allan B., Steyn L. Simple method for production of internal control DNA for Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction assays. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):2204–2207. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2204-2207.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES