Abstract
The simple, rapid, two-step Diff-Quik stain procedure (Baxter Diagnostics) was compared with the Papanicolaou stain for microscopic determination of endocervical specimen quality. Results from 230 (98.7%) of 233 specimens stained by both methods indicated agreement between the two staining methods for detection of the endocervical cells or erythrocytes indicating specimen adequacy. By using the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis Test (Roche Diagnostic Systems) to detect C.trachomatis and the Diff-Quik stain to assess specimen adequacy, PCR-positive results were obtained from 147 (9.1%) of 1,615 microscopically adequate specimens but from only 13 (2.2%) of the 583 inadequate specimens (P < 0.001).
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barnes R. C. Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Apr;2(2):119–136. doi: 10.1128/cmr.2.2.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bass C. A., Jungkind D. L., Silverman N. S., Bondi J. M. Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2648–2653. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2648-2653.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kellogg J. A., Seiple J. W., Klinedinst J. L., Levisky J. S. Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991 Dec;115(12):1223–1227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kellogg J. A., Seiple J. W., Klinedinst J. L., Stroll E. S., Cavanaugh S. H. Improved PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by using an altered method of specimen transport and high-quality endocervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Oct;33(10):2765–2767. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2765-2767.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kellogg J. A., Seiple J. W., Murray C. L., Levisky J. S. Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1108–1113. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1108-1113.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loeffelholz M. J., Lewinski C. A., Silver S. R., Purohit A. P., Herman S. A., Buonagurio D. A., Dragon E. A. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2847–2851. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2847-2851.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillips R. S., Hanff P. A., Kauffman R. S., Aronson M. D. Use of a direct fluorescent antibody test for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection in women seeking routine gynecologic care. J Infect Dis. 1987 Oct;156(4):575–581. doi: 10.1093/infdis/156.4.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]