Abstract
A six-laboratory collaborative study was conducted to develop MIC and zone diameter quality control limits and interpretive criteria for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae with azithromycin, clarithromycin, dirithromycin, and clindamycin. The MICs of all of the agents plus erythromycin for 302 clinical isolates of pneumococci that had been selected with an emphasis on resistant strains were determined by use of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)-recommended broth microdilution procedure. The zone diameters of the isolates were also determined for the same agents except erythromycin by the NCCLS disk diffusion test procedure. Repeated testing of S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 with different sources and lots of media and disks allowed development of MIC and zone diameter quality control ranges for these agents. Interpretive criteria for the MIC of azithromycin were established and were as follows: susceptible, < or = 0.5 microgram/ml; intermediate, 1 microgram/ml; and resistant, > or = 2 micrograms/ml. The interpretive criteria advocated for the MICs of clarithromycin and clindamycin were as follows: susceptible, < or = 0.25 microgram/ml; intermediate, 0.5 microgram/ml; and resistant, > or = 1 microgram/ml. Comparison of MICs and disk diffusion zone diameters led to the development of interpretive criteria for the zone diameters for azithromycin, clarithromycin, and clindamycin that correlated well with these MIC breakpoints. Testing of this organism collection also led to the reestablishment of the erythromycin MIC breakpoints as being identical to those of clarithromycin, which resulted in equivalent cross-susceptibility and cross-resistance for the three macrolides that are currently marketed in the United States. Thus, the susceptibility of pneumococci to azithromycin and clarithromycin can be predicted accurately by testing only erythromycin in clinical laboratories. This recommendation, as well as the interpretive and quality control criteria that are described, have been accepted by NCCLS and are included in the latest NCCLS susceptibility testing guidelines.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (209.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Breiman R. F., Butler J. C., Tenover F. C., Elliott J. A., Facklam R. R. Emergence of drug-resistant pneumococcal infections in the United States. JAMA. 1994 Jun 15;271(23):1831–1835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chesney P. J. The escalating problem of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Am J Dis Child. 1992 Aug;146(8):912–916. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160200034022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ednie L. M., Visalli M. A., Jacobs M. R., Appelbaum P. C. Comparative activities of clarithromycin, erythromycin, and azithromycin against penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Aug;40(8):1950–1952. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.8.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedland I. R., McCracken G. H., Jr Management of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 11;331(6):377–382. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408113310607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gavan T. L., Jones R. N., Barry A. L., Fuchs P. C., Gerlach E. H., Matsen J. M., Reller L. B., Thornsberry C., Thrupp L. D. Quality control limits for ampicillin, carbenicillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin disk diffusion susceptibility tests: a collaborative study. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jul;14(1):67–72. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.1.67-72.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hofmann J., Cetron M. S., Farley M. M., Baughman W. S., Facklam R. R., Elliott J. A., Deaver K. A., Breiman R. F. The prevalence of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Atlanta. N Engl J Med. 1995 Aug 24;333(8):481–486. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508243330803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs M. R. Treatment and diagnosis of infections caused by drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;15(1):119–127. doi: 10.1093/clinids/15.1.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jorgensen J. H., Swenson J. M., Tenover F. C., Ferraro M. J., Hindler J. A., Murray P. R. Development of interpretive criteria and quality control limits for broth microdilution and disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2448–2459. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2448-2459.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirst H. A., Sides G. D. New directions for macrolide antibiotics: structural modifications and in vitro activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Sep;33(9):1413–1418. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.9.1413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klugman K. P. Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Apr;3(2):171–196. doi: 10.1128/cmr.3.2.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metzler C. M., DeHaan R. M. Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations. J Infect Dis. 1974 Dec;130(6):588–594. doi: 10.1093/infdis/130.6.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutcliffe J., Tait-Kamradt A., Wondrack L. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Aug;40(8):1817–1824. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.8.1817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]