Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Nov;34(11):2685–2687. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.11.2685-2687.1996

Pseudo-outbreak of Enterococcus durans infections and colonization associated with introduction of an automated identification system software update.

D A Singer 1, E M Jochimsen 1, P Gielerak 1, W R Jarvis 1
PMCID: PMC229386  PMID: 8897165

Abstract

Enterococci are an important cause of hospital-acquired infections. Since 1989, there has been an increase in the number of nosocomial enterococcal infections caused by strains resistant to vancomycin in the United States. Although many enterococcal species can colonize humans, only Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium, E. raffinosus, and E. casseliflavus have been implicated in clusters of infection. In January 1996, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention received a report of an outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in which 31 of 84 (36.9%) isolates were identified as E. durans. Twenty-nine isolates identified as E. durans were identified to the species level after the introduction of an automated identification system software update (Vitek gram-positive identification card, version R09.1) for the identification of species of gram-positive organisms. When seven isolates initially reported as E. durans were identified to the species level by alternate methods, they were found to be E. faecium. Subsequently, isolates identified as E. durans by the automated system were reidentified by using a rapid streptococcus test, and no further enterococcal isolate has been confirmed as E. durans. Automated microbial analysis is a potential source of error that is not easily recognized. When laboratory findings are discordant with expected clinical or epidemiologic patterns, confirmatory testing by alternate methods should be performed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (170.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyce J. M. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: pervasive and persistent pathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;16(12):676–679. doi: 10.1086/647040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cercenado E., Unal S., Eliopoulos C. T., Rubin L. G., Isenberg H. D., Moellering R. C., Jr, Eliopoulos G. M. Characterization of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus durans. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Nov;36(5):821–825. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.5.821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Garner J. S., Jarvis W. R., Emori T. G., Horan T. C., Hughes J. M. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988 Jun;16(3):128–140. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Morris J. G., Jr, Shay D. K., Hebden J. N., McCarter R. J., Jr, Perdue B. E., Jarvis W., Johnson J. A., Dowling T. C., Polish L. B., Schwalbe R. S. Enterococci resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents, including vancomycin. Establishment of endemicity in a university medical center. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Aug 15;123(4):250–259. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-4-199508150-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schaberg D. R., Culver D. H., Gaynes R. P. Major trends in the microbial etiology of nosocomial infection. Am J Med. 1991 Sep 16;91(3B):72S–75S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90346-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shay D. K., Goldmann D. A., Jarvis W. R. Reducing the spread of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms. Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1995 Jun;42(3):703–716. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38986-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES