Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Dec;34(12):3040–3043. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.12.3040-3043.1996

Performance of fungal blood cultures by using the Isolator collection system: is it cost-effective?

R M Morrell Jr 1, B L Wasilauskas 1, C H Steffee 1
PMCID: PMC229456  PMID: 8940445

Abstract

Enhanced recovery of fungal isolates from blood by using the Isolator system has been reported previously. We examined bacterial and fungal blood cultures during a 14-month period to determine if this enhanced recovery required a separate fungal culture and to determine the differential utility between a fungal blood culture and a routine bacterial culture. During this period, 84 of 5,196 (1.6%) fungal blood cultures and 170 of 25,702 (0.6%) bacterial blood cultures were positive for yeast or filamentous fungi. Thirty-seven positive fungal cultures, simultaneously collected, had correspondingly positive bacterial cultures. An additional 15 positive fungal cultures yielded isolates that had either been previously recovered from a bacterial culture or were recovered from a bacterial culture collected within 48 h. Of the 32 unpaired fungal cultures remaining, 5 were Candida albicans whose unique isolation was believed to be the result of specimen sampling variance rather than any enhanced recovery characteristics of fungal culture methods. Examination of patient data relating to the 27 remaining isolates (24 patients episodes) showed that only five fungal blood cultures (0.096% of all collected) had any impact on patient therapy decisions, and one of these was judged to be the cause of unnecessary therapy. Our data suggest that separate fungal cultures of blood are not cost-effective for those laboratories using the Isolator for routine blood cultures and furthermore may not be cost-effective for laboratories using automated broth systems that are comparable to the Isolator in recovery of fungi.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (177.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bille J., Edson R. S., Roberts G. D. Clinical evaluation of the lysis-centrifugation blood culture system for the detection of fungemia and comparison with a conventional biphasic broth blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):126–128. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.126-128.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Geha D. J., Roberts G. D. Laboratory detection of fungemia. Clin Lab Med. 1994 Mar;14(1):83–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guerra-Romero L., Edson R. S., Cockerill F. R., 3rd, Horstmeier C. D., Roberts G. D. Comparison of Du Pont Isolator and Roche Septi-Chek for detection of fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Sep;25(9):1623–1625. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.9.1623-1625.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Henry N. K., McLimans C. A., Wright A. J., Thompson R. L., Wilson W. R., Washington J. A., 2nd Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):864–869. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.5.864-869.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morris A. J., Byrne T. C., Madden J. F., Reller L. B. Duration of incubation of fungal cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jun;34(6):1583–1585. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.6.1583-1585.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Telenti A., Roberts G. D. Fungal blood cultures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;8(9):825–831. doi: 10.1007/BF02185855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wilson M. L., Davis T. E., Mirrett S., Reynolds J., Fuller D., Allen S. D., Flint K. K., Koontz F., Reller L. B. Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):865–871. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.865-871.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES