Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Dec;34(12):3208–3211. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.12.3208-3211.1996

Comparative evaluation of three antifungal susceptibility test methods for Candida albicans isolates and correlation with response to fluconazole therapy.

M Ruhnke 1, A Schmidt-Westhausen 1, E Engelmann 1, M Trautmann 1
PMCID: PMC229485  PMID: 8940474

Abstract

In vitro susceptibilities were determined for 56 Candida albicans isolates obtained from the oral cavities of 41 patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The agents tested included fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, flucytosine, and amphotericin B. MICs were determined by the broth microdilution technique following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards document M27-P (M27-P micro), a broth microdilution technique using high-resolution medium (HR micro), and the Etest with solidified yeast-nitrogen base agar. The in vitro findings were correlated with in vivo response to fluconazole therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis. For all C. albicans isolates from patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis not responding to fluconazole MICs were found to be > or = 6.25 micrograms/ml by the M27-P micro method and > or = 25 micrograms/ml by the HR micro method as well as the Etest. However, for several C. albicans isolates from patients who responded to fluconazole therapy MICs found to be above the suggested breakpoints of resistance. The appropriate rank order of best agreement between the M27-P micro method and HR micro method was amphotericin B > fluconazole > flucytosine > ketoconazole > itraconazole. The appropriate rank order with best agreement between the M27-P micro method and the Etest was flucytosine > amphotericin B > fluconazole > ketoconazole > or = itraconazole. It could be concluded that a good correlation between in vitro resistance and clinical failure was found with all methods. However, the test methods used in this study did not necessarily predict clinical response to therapy with fluconazole.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (193.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barchiesi F., Colombo A. L., McGough D. A., Fothergill A. W., Rinaldi M. G. In vitro activity of itraconazole against fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant Candida albicans isolates from oral cavities of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jul;38(7):1530–1533. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.7.1530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron M. L., Schell W. A., Bruch S., Bartlett J. A., Waskin H. A., Perfect J. R. Correlation of in vitro fluconazole resistance of Candida isolates in relation to therapy and symptoms of individuals seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Nov;37(11):2449–2453. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.11.2449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colombo A. L., Barchiesi F., McGough D. A., Rinaldi M. G. Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for azole antifungal susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Mar;33(3):535–540. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.3.535-540.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Espinel-Ingroff A. Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Aug;19(4):217–220. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Espinel-Ingroff A., Kish C. W., Jr, Kerkering T. M., Fromtling R. A., Bartizal K., Galgiani J. N., Villareal K., Pfaller M. A., Gerarden T., Rinaldi M. G. Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3138–3145. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3138-3145.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Espinel-Ingroff A., Rodríguez-Tudela J. L., Martínez-Suárez J. V. Comparison of two alternative microdilution procedures with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference macrodilution method M27-P for in vitro testing of fluconazole-resistant and -susceptible isolates of Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Dec;33(12):3154–3158. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.12.3154-3158.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pfaller M. A., Dupont B., Kobayashi G. S., Müller J., Rinaldi M. G., Espinel-Ingroff A., Shadomy S., Troke P. F., Walsh T. J., Warnock D. W. Standardized susceptibility testing of fluconazole: an international collaborative study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Sep;36(9):1805–1809. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.9.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pfaller M. A., Grant C., Morthland V., Rhine-Chalberg J. Comparative evaluation of alternative methods for broth dilution susceptibility testing of fluconazole against Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):506–509. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.506-509.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pfaller M. A., Rhine-Chalberg J., Redding S. W., Smith J., Farinacci G., Fothergill A. W., Rinaldi M. G. Variations in fluconazole susceptibility and electrophoretic karyotype among oral isolates of Candida albicans from patients with AIDS and oral candidiasis. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jan;32(1):59–64. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.1.59-64.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Quereda C., Polanco A. M., Giner C., Sánchez-Sousa A., Pereira E., Navas E., Fortún J., Guerrero A., Baquero F. Correlation between in vitro resistance to fluconazole and clinical outcome of oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Jan;15(1):30–37. doi: 10.1007/BF01586182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Redding S., Smith J., Farinacci G., Rinaldi M., Fothergill A., Rhine-Chalberg J., Pfaller M. Resistance of Candida albicans to fluconazole during treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in a patient with AIDS: documentation by in vitro susceptibility testing and DNA subtype analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Feb;18(2):240–242. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.2.240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rex J. H., Pfaller M. A., Barry A. L., Nelson P. W., Webb C. D. Antifungal susceptibility testing of isolates from a randomized, multicenter trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B as treatment of nonneutropenic patients with candidemia. NIAID Mycoses Study Group and the Candidemia Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Jan;39(1):40–44. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.1.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ruhnke M., Eigler A., Tennagen I., Geiseler B., Engelmann E., Trautmann M. Emergence of fluconazole-resistant strains of Candida albicans in patients with recurrent oropharyngeal candidosis and human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2092–2098. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2092-2098.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sewell D. L., Pfaller M. A., Barry A. L. Comparison of broth macrodilution, broth microdilution, and E test antifungal susceptibility tests for fluconazole. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2099–2102. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2099-2102.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES