Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Jan;35(1):121–124. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.121-124.1997

Clinical evaluation of difco ESP culture system II for growth and detection of mycobacteria.

G L Woods 1, G Fish 1, M Plaunt 1, T Murphy 1
PMCID: PMC229523  PMID: 8968892

Abstract

The reliability of the ESP Culture System II (ESP II; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.), a continuously monitoring mycobacterial culture system, was evaluated by comparing its performance with the BACTEC TB 460 (BACTEC TB) and Middlebrook 7H11/7H11 selective agar systems. A total of 2,283 specimens of all types (70.7% were respiratory specimens) were cultured; 149 (6.5%) yielded mycobacteria. The most common species recovered were Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC, 73 isolates) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC, 53 isolates). The recovery rates by individual system were 87, 81, and 65% for ESP II, BACTEC TB, and Middlebrook agar, respectively, for all mycobacteria; the recovery rates were 89, 92, and 89%, respectively, for MTBC. For liquid plus solid medium system combinations, recovery rates for all mycobacteria and for MTBC, respectively, were 91 and 94% for ESP II plus Middlebrook agar and 85 and 96% for BACTEC TB plus Middlebrook agar. The difference between the recovery rates of all mycobacteria by ESP II and by BACTEC TB was not significant, whereas for the individual species, the only significant difference was recovery of more isolates of MAC by ESP II. For those isolates recovered in the individual systems, mean times to detection of all mycobacteria, MTBC, and MAC, respectively, were 13.1, 15.5, and 10.9 days for ESP II; 14.4, 16.6, and 12.1 days for BACTEC TB; and 17.8, 18.3, and 18.8 days for Middlebrook agar. ESP II is a reliable, nonradiometric, less labor-intensive alternative to BACTEC TB for growth and detection of mycobacteria, but as with other liquid culture methods, ESP II should be used in combination with a solid medium, not as a stand-alone system.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (170.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abe C., Hosojima S., Fukasawa Y., Kazumi Y., Takahashi M., Hirano K., Mori T. Comparison of MB-Check, BACTEC, and egg-based media for recovery of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Apr;30(4):878–881. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.878-881.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anargyros P., Astill D. S., Lim I. S. Comparison of improved BACTEC and Lowenstein-Jensen media for culture of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1288–1291. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1288-1291.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anhalt J. P., Witebsky F. G., Woods G. L. College of American Pathologists position statement regarding rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993 Sep;117(9):873–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Conville P. S., Witebsky F. G. Inter-bottle transfer of mycobacteria by the BACTEC 460. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep-Oct;12(5):401–405. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90110-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edlin B. R., Tokars J. I., Grieco M. H., Crawford J. T., Williams J., Sordillo E. M., Ong K. R., Kilburn J. O., Dooley S. W., Castro K. G. An outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among hospitalized patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jun 4;326(23):1514–1521. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206043262302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fischl M. A., Daikos G. L., Uttamchandani R. B., Poblete R. B., Moreno J. N., Reyes R. R., Boota A. M., Thompson L. M., Cleary T. J., Oldham S. A. Clinical presentation and outcome of patients with HIV infection and tuberculosis caused by multiple-drug-resistant bacilli. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Aug 1;117(3):184–190. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-3-184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Inderlied C. B., Kemper C. A., Bermudez L. E. The Mycobacterium avium complex. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Jul;6(3):266–310. doi: 10.1128/cmr.6.3.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stager C. E., Libonati J. P., Siddiqi S. H., Davis J. R., Hooper N. M., Baker J. F., Carter M. E. Role of solid media when used in conjunction with the BACTEC system for mycobacterial isolation and identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):154–157. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.154-157.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tenover F. C., Crawford J. T., Huebner R. E., Geiter L. J., Horsburgh C. R., Jr, Good R. C. The resurgence of tuberculosis: is your laboratory ready? J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):767–770. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.767-770.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vannier A. M., Tarrand J. J., Murray P. R. Mycobacterial cross contamination during radiometric culturing. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Sep;26(9):1867–1868. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.9.1867-1868.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES