Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Jan;35(1):193–196. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.193-196.1997

Comparative evaluation of two commercial amplification assays for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens.

C Piersimoni 1, A Callegaro 1, D Nista 1, S Bornigia 1, F De Conti 1, G Santini 1, G De Sio 1
PMCID: PMC229537  PMID: 8968906

Abstract

Two commercial assays detecting the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical specimens by rRNA target amplification (Gen-Probe Amplified M. tuberculosis Direct Test [AMTD]) and PCR (Amplicor) were evaluated. The tests were applied to 327 digested, decontaminated respiratory specimens collected from 236 patients. Results were compared with those of acid-fast staining and culture. The combination of culture and clinical diagnosis was considered the "gold standard." A total of 60 specimens were collected from 27 patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Thirteen of these specimens were from patients receiving standard antituberculosis therapy and therefore were not included in the comparison. Of the remaining 47 specimens, 33 were smear positive, 40 were culture positive, 45 were AMTD positive, and 39 were Amplicor positive. After resolution of discrepant results, the overall sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were 77, 100, 100, and 95 for staining; 87, 100, 100, and 97.4 for culture; 95.9, 98.9, 94, and 99.2 for AMTD; and 85.4, 99.6, 97.9, and 97.1 for Amplicor, respectively. Agreement between AMTD and Amplicor assay results was 96.8%. It is concluded that although both nucleic acid amplification methods are rapid and specific for the detection of M. tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens, AMTD appeared to be more sensitive than Amplicor.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (164.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abe C., Hirano K., Wada M., Kazumi Y., Takahashi M., Fukasawa Y., Yoshimura T., Miyagi C., Goto S. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction and Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3270–3274. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3270-3274.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carpentier E., Drouillard B., Dailloux M., Moinard D., Vallee E., Dutilh B., Maugein J., Bergogne-Berezin E., Carbonnelle B. Diagnosis of tuberculosis by Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis test: a multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Dec;33(12):3106–3110. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.12.3106-3110.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cho S. N., van der Vliet G. M., Park S., Baik S. H., Kim S. K., Chong Y., Kolk A. H., Klatser P. R., Kim J. D. Colorimetric microwell plate hybridization assay for detection of amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA from sputum samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Mar;33(3):752–754. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.3.752-754.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarridge J. E., 3rd, Shawar R. M., Shinnick T. M., Plikaytis B. B. Large-scale use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a routine mycobacteriology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):2049–2056. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2049-2056.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. D'Amato R. F., Wallman A. A., Hochstein L. H., Colaninno P. M., Scardamaglia M., Ardila E., Ghouri M., Kim K., Patel R. C., Miller A. Rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis by using Roche AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR test. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jul;33(7):1832–1834. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1832-1834.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Folgueira L., Delgado R., Palenque E., Noriega A. R. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in clinical samples by using a simple lysis method and polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):1019–1021. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.1019-1021.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forbes B. A., Hicks K. E. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens in a clinical laboratory by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jul;31(7):1688–1694. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1688-1694.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ichiyama S., Iinuma Y., Tawada Y., Yamori S., Hasegawa Y., Shimokata K., Nakashima N. Evaluation of Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test and Roche PCR-microwell plate hybridization method (AMPLICOR MYCOBACTERIUM) for direct detection of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jan;34(1):130–133. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.1.130-133.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kox L. F., Rhienthong D., Miranda A. M., Udomsantisuk N., Ellis K., van Leeuwen J., van Heusden S., Kuijper S., Kolk A. H. A more reliable PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Mar;32(3):672–678. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.3.672-678.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller N., Hernandez S. G., Cleary T. J. Evaluation of Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test and PCR for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):393–397. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.393-397.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moore D. F., Curry J. I. Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by Amplicor PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Oct;33(10):2686–2691. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2686-2691.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Noordhoek G. T., Kaan J. A., Mulder S., Wilke H., Kolk A. H. Routine application of the polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. J Clin Pathol. 1995 Sep;48(9):810–814. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.9.810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Noordhoek G. T., van Embden J. D., Kolk A. H. Questionable reliability of the polymerase chain reaction in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):2036–2036. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pfyffer G. E., Kissling P., Wirth R., Weber R. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by a target-amplified test system. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Apr;32(4):918–923. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.918-923.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schirm J., Oostendorp L. A., Mulder J. G. Comparison of Amplicor, in-house PCR, and conventional culture for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Dec;33(12):3221–3224. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.12.3221-3224.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vlaspolder F., Singer P., Roggeveen C. Diagnostic value of an amplification method (Gen-Probe) compared with that of culture for diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Oct;33(10):2699–2703. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2699-2703.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vuorinen P., Miettinen A., Vuento R., Hällström O. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test and Roche Amplicor Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Test. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jul;33(7):1856–1859. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1856-1859.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES