Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Jan;35(1):313–316. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.313-316.1997

Candida and Torulopsis: a blinded evaluation of use of pseudohypha formation as basis for identification of medically important yeasts.

F C Odds 1, M G Rinaldi 1, C R Cooper Jr 1, A Fothergill 1, L Pasarell 1, M R McGinnis 1
PMCID: PMC229568  PMID: 8968937

Abstract

Seventy yeast isolates representing species in the genera Candida and Torulopsis but excluding Candida albicans were examined in three laboratories for production of pseudohyphae in Dalmau cultures. The microscopic morphology of the isolates was scrutinized by four individuals experienced in yeast identification and three inexperienced persons, all of whom were blinded as to the putative identification of the yeasts. For 49 (70%) of the 70 isolates, the seven observers recorded comparable scores for morphology, but 5 (7%) of the isolates showed extreme variation in recorded morphologies, from true hyphae formed to no pseudohyphae formed. Isolates of Candida parapsilosis and Torulopsis glabrata consistently did and did not form pseudohyphae, respectively: however, other Candida and Torulopsis spp. did not always express their expected morphologies. In 48 (19%) of 252 readings (seven observers), 36 isolates of Candida spp. were scored as forming no pseudohyphae, and in 22 (9.2%) of 238 readings, 34 isolates of Torulopsis spp. were recorded as forming true hyphae or pseudohyphae. These results show that pseudohypha formation is not a reliable characteristic for identification of yeasts at the genus level; we suggest that the merger of Torulopsis spp. into the genus Candida should be finally accepted.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (165.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kane J., Krajden S., Summerbell R. C. Torulopsis: still legitimate name for medically important yeast. CMAJ. 1986 Aug 15;135(4):274–275. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. McGinnis M. R., Ajello L., Beneke E. S., Drouhet E., Goodman N. L., Halde C. J., Haley L. D., Kane J., Land G. A., Padhye A. A. Taxonomic and nomenclatural evaluation of the genera Candida and Torulopsis. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):813–814. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.813-814.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Odds F. C. Effects of temperature on anti-Candida activities of antifungal antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Apr;37(4):685–691. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.4.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Odds F. C., Sackin M. J., Jones D. Numerical taxonomic analysis of imperfect yeast species in Candida and Torulopsis shows no basis for generic separation. J Gen Microbiol. 1990 Apr;136(4):761–765. doi: 10.1099/00221287-136-4-761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES