Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Mar;35(3):663–666. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.3.663-666.1997

Comparison of DNA fingerprint patterns of isolates of Mycobacterium africanum from east and west Africa.

W H Haas 1, G Bretzel 1, B Amthor 1, K Schilke 1, G Krommes 1, S Rüsch-Gerdes 1, V Sticht-Groh 1, H J Bremer 1
PMCID: PMC229646  PMID: 9041408

Abstract

Mycobacterium africanum is a pathogen found in tuberculosis patients in certain parts of Africa and is a member of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Biochemically, strains of M. africanum exhibit a high degree of variability, with some tendency to cluster according to their geographical origin. To investigate whether this phenotypic variability is reflected at the genetic level, we performed DNA fingerprint analysis of strains isolated from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Uganda and Sierra Leone. IS6110 DNA fingerprinting was carried out by the mixed-linker PCR method. A total of 138 strains of M. africanum were analyzed: 42 isolates from Uganda and 96 isolates from Sierra Leone. With few exceptions, the resulting DNA fingerprint patterns grouped together according to their country of origin. A striking lack of variability of DNA fingerprints was found for strains from Sierra Leone, where 70 of 96 isolates (61.5%) fell into clusters. The two largest clusters accounted for 41.7% of all isolates and differed by only one band, as confirmed by standard DNA fingerprinting. In contrast, only two clusters (7.1%) with two and three isolates, respectively, were found for M. africanum isolates collected in Uganda, and three of the DNA fingerprints contained fewer than seven bands. Strains of M. tuberculosis collected and processed during the same time period were highly variable in both countries. Our results support the concept of geographically defined subtypes of M. africanum. In addition, they demonstrate that natural geographic differences in the variability of IS6110 DNA fingerprints within the M. tuberculosis complex must be considered if this technique is used for epidemiologic studies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (126.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Canetti G., Fox W., Khomenko A., Mahler H. T., Menon N. K., Mitchison D. A., Rist N., Smelev N. A. Advances in techniques of testing mycobacterial drug sensitivity, and the use of sensitivity tests in tuberculosis control programmes. Bull World Health Organ. 1969;41(1):21–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Castets M., Boisvert H., Grumbach F., Brunel M., Rist N. Les bacilles tuberculeux de type Africain: note préliminaire. Rev Tuberc Pneumol (Paris) 1968 Mar;32(2):179–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gross W. M., Wayne L. G. Nucleic acid homology in the genus Mycobacterium. J Bacteriol. 1970 Nov;104(2):630–634. doi: 10.1128/jb.104.2.630-634.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gutiérrez M., Samper S., Gavigan J. A., García Marín J. F., Martín C. Differentiation by molecular typing of Mycobacterium bovis strains causing tuberculosis in cattle and goats. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Nov;33(11):2953–2956. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.2953-2956.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haas W. H., Butler W. R., Woodley C. L., Crawford J. T. Mixed-linker polymerase chain reaction: a new method for rapid fingerprinting of isolates of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1293–1298. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1293-1298.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hermans P. W., Messadi F., Guebrexabher H., van Soolingen D., de Haas P. E., Heersma H., de Neeling H., Ayoub A., Portaels F., Frommel D. Analysis of the population structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ethiopia, Tunisia, and The Netherlands: usefulness of DNA typing for global tuberculosis epidemiology. J Infect Dis. 1995 Jun;171(6):1504–1513. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.6.1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Musser J. M. Antimicrobial agent resistance in mycobacteria: molecular genetic insights. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995 Oct;8(4):496–514. doi: 10.1128/cmr.8.4.496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wayne L. G. Simple pyrazinamidase and urease tests for routine identification of mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974 Jan;109(1):147–151. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1974.109.1.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. van Embden J. D., Cave M. D., Crawford J. T., Dale J. W., Eisenach K. D., Gicquel B., Hermans P., Martin C., McAdam R., Shinnick T. M. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Feb;31(2):406–409. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.406-409.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. van Soolingen D., de Haas P. E., Haagsma J., Eger T., Hermans P. W., Ritacco V., Alito A., van Embden J. D. Use of various genetic markers in differentiation of Mycobacterium bovis strains from animals and humans and for studying epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2425–2433. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2425-2433.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES