Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Apr;35(4):957–959. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.957-959.1997

Reproducibility problems with the AMPLICOR PCR Chlamydia trachomatis test.

E M Peterson 1, V Darrow 1, J Blanding 1, S Aarnaes 1, L M de la Maza 1
PMCID: PMC229709  PMID: 9157161

Abstract

In an attempt to use an expanded "gold standard" in an evaluation of an antigen detection test for Chlamydia trachomatis, the AMPLICOR (Roche Diagnostics Systems, Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) PCR Chlamydia trachomatis test and culture were used with 591 sets of cervical specimens. Of the 591 specimens assayed, 35 were retested due to either an equivocal result by the PCR (19 samples) or a discrepancy between the results of culture, PCR, and the antigen detection method. During the repeat testing of the samples with equivocal and discrepant results, all but one interpretation change was due to the PCR result. In addition, upon repeat testing the PCR assay value measured in optical density units varied widely for 13 of these specimens. These 13 specimens were then tested in triplicate by the manufacturer with primers to the chlamydia plasmid and in duplicate with primers to the major outer membrane protein. Only 3 of the 13 specimens gave the same interpretation with these five replicates. In summary, reproducibility problems with the AMPLICOR test should be considered before it is incorporated as part of routine testing or used as an expanded gold standard for chlamydia testing.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (55.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aarnaes S. L., Peterson E. M., De La Maza L. M. The effect of media and temperature on the storage of Chlamydia trachomatis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 Feb;81(2):237–239. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/81.2.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bass C. A., Jungkind D. L., Silverman N. S., Bondi J. M. Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2648–2653. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2648-2653.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauwens J. E., Clark A. M., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):3023–3027. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.3023-3027.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beem M. O., Saxon E. M. Respiratory-tract colonization and a distinctive pneumonia syndrome in infants infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. N Engl J Med. 1977 Feb 10;296(6):306–310. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197702102960604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hadgu A. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis. Lancet. 1996 Aug 31;348(9027):592–593. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Handsfield H. H., Jasman L. L., Roberts P. L., Hanson V. W., Kothenbeutel R. L., Stamm W. E. Criteria for selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending family planning clinics. JAMA. 1986 Apr 4;255(13):1730–1734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Henry-Suchet J., Catalan F., Loffredo V., Sanson M. J., Debache C., Pigeau F., Coppin R. Chlamydia trachomatis associated with chronic inflammation in abdominal specimens from women selected for tuboplasty. Fertil Steril. 1981 Nov;36(5):599–605. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45857-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kellogg J. A., Seiple J. W., Klinedinst J. L., Stroll E. S., Cavanaugh S. H. Improved PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by using an altered method of specimen transport and high-quality endocervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Oct;33(10):2765–2767. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2765-2767.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lin J. S., Jones W. E., Yan L., Wirthwein K. A., Flaherty E. E., Haivanis R. M., Rice P. A. Underdiagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Diagnostic limitations in patients with low-level infection. Sex Transm Dis. 1992 Sep-Oct;19(5):259–265. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199209000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mahony J. B., Chernesky M. A. Effect of swab type and storage temperature on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Nov;22(5):865–867. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.5.865-867.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mårdh P. A., Ripa T., Svensson L., Weström L. Chilamydia trachomatis infection in patients with acute salpingitis. N Engl J Med. 1977 Jun 16;296(24):1377–1379. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197706162962403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peterson E. M., Markoff B. A., Schachter J., de la Maza L. M. The 7.5-kb plasmid present in Chlamydia trachomatis is not essential for the growth of this microorganism. Plasmid. 1990 Mar;23(2):144–148. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(90)90033-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peterson E. M., Oda R., Alexander R., Greenwood J. R., de la Maza L. M. Molecular techniques for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2359–2363. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2359-2363.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanders L. L., Jr, Harrison H. R., Washington A. E. Treatment of sexually transmitted chlamydial infections. JAMA. 1986 Apr 4;255(13):1750–1756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schachter J., Stamm W. E., Chernesky M. A., Hook E. W., 3rd, Jones R. B., Judson F. N., Kellogg J. A., LeBar B., Mårdh P. A., McCormack W. M. Nonculture tests for genital tract chlamydial infection. What does the package insert mean, and will it mean the same thing tomorrow? Sex Transm Dis. 1992 Sep-Oct;19(5):243–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schachter J., Stamm W. E., Quinn T. C., Andrews W. W., Burczak J. D., Lee H. H. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2540–2543. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2540-2543.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Verkooyen R. P., Luijendijk A., Huisman W. M., Goessens W. H., Kluytmans J. A., van Rijsoort-Vos J. H., Verbrugh H. A. Detection of PCR inhibitors in cervical specimens by using the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Dec;34(12):3072–3074. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.12.3072-3074.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Barbeyrac B., Rodriguez P., Dutilh B., Le Roux P., Bébéar C. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction compared with polymerase chain reaction and cell culture in urogenital specimens. Genitourin Med. 1995 Dec;71(6):382–386. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.6.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES