Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Aug;35(8):2072–2075. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2072-2075.1997

Evaluation of a nonradiometric system (BACTEC 9000 MB) for detection of mycobacteria in human clinical samples.

S Zanetti 1, F Ardito 1, L Sechi 1, M Sanguinetti 1, P Molicotti 1, G Delogu 1, M P Pinna 1, A Nacci 1, G Fadda 1
PMCID: PMC229905  PMID: 9230384

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate the rate of recovery and time required for detection of mycobacteria from pulmonary and extrapulmonary human clinical samples, by using a fluorescence-quenching-based oxygen sensor (BACTEC 9000 MB; Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Sparks, Md.). The results were compared with those obtained by microscopy, conventional culture in Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium, and a BACTEC radiometric system (BACTEC 460 TB; Becton Dickinson). Of the 779 clinical samples processed, 364 from pulmonary sites and 415 from extrapulmonary sites, 62 (7.9%) were positive for mycobacterial isolates; of the positive samples, 59 (95.1%) were detected with the fluorescent BACTEC 9000 MB system, 57 (91.9%) were detected with the radiometric system (BACTEC 460 TB), and 43 (69.3%) were detected with LJ conventional culture. The mean times to detection of all mycobacteria with BACTEC 9000 MB and BACTEC 460 TB were similar (10.3 and 10.0 days, respectively). The results obtained indicate that the nonradiometric BACTEC (BACTEC 9000 MB) system is as efficient as Bactec 460 TB and significantly more efficient than LJ for the rapid recovery of mycobacteria from both pulmonary and extrapulmonary clinical specimens. Though the BACTEC 9000 MB system is recommended for respiratory specimens, we demonstrated that it can be successfully used also for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens from various extrapulmonary sites.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (93.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abe C., Hosojima S., Fukasawa Y., Kazumi Y., Takahashi M., Hirano K., Mori T. Comparison of MB-Check, BACTEC, and egg-based media for recovery of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Apr;30(4):878–881. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.878-881.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anargyros P., Astill D. S., Lim I. S. Comparison of improved BACTEC and Lowenstein-Jensen media for culture of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1288–1291. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1288-1291.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ellner P. D., Kiehn T. E., Cammarata R., Hosmer M. Rapid detection and identification of pathogenic mycobacteria by combining radiometric and nucleic acid probe methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jul;26(7):1349–1352. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.7.1349-1352.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fadda G., Roe S. L. Recovery and susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from extrapulmonary specimens by the BACTEC radiometric method. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 May;19(5):720–721. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.5.720-721.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kirihara J. M., Hillier S. L., Coyle M. B. Improved detection times for Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium tuberculosis with the BACTEC radiometric system. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Nov;22(5):841–845. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.5.841-845.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Morgan M. A., Horstmeier C. D., DeYoung D. R., Roberts G. D. Comparison of a radiometric method (BACTEC) and conventional culture media for recovery of mycobacteria from smear-negative specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Aug;18(2):384–388. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.2.384-388.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. van Griethuysen A. J., Jansz A. R., Buiting A. G. Comparison of fluorescent BACTEC 9000 MB system, Septi-Chek AFB system, and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for detection of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Oct;34(10):2391–2394. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.10.2391-2394.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES