Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Aug;35(8):2170–2173. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2170-2173.1997

Evaluation of the AnaeroPack system for growth of anaerobic bacteria.

K G Van Horn 1, K Warren 1, E J Baccaglini 1
PMCID: PMC229930  PMID: 9230409

Abstract

Growth of anaerobic bacteria in the AnaeroPack (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America, Inc., New York, N.Y.) anaerobic atmosphere generation systems, both the AnaeroPack jar and pouch and the AnaeroPack in a GasPak jar were considered equivalent to or better than growth obtained in the corresponding GasPak jar or pouch system (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) for 89 (86%) of the 103 anaerobes tested. There were a total of 26 discrepancies after 48 h of incubation, with 16 discrepancies unresolved after 96 h of incubation. The AnaeroPack jar and pouch never failed to reduce the anaerobic indicator. The AnaeroPack systems are easy to use and performed at least as well as or better than the BBL GasPak systems for growth of anaerobic bacteria.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Delaney M. L., Onderdonk A. B. Evaluation of the AnaeroPack system for growth of clinically significant anaerobes. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Mar;35(3):558–562. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.3.558-562.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Downes J., Mangels J. I., Holden J., Ferraro M. J., Baron E. J. Evaluation of two single-plate incubation systems and the anaerobic chamber for the cultivation of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Feb;28(2):246–248. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.2.246-248.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldstein E. J., Citron D. M., Goldman R. J. National hospital survey of anaerobic culture and susceptibility testing methods: results and recommendations for improvement. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jun;30(6):1529–1534. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1529-1534.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mangels J. I., Douglas B. P. Comparison of four commercial brucella agar media for growth of anaerobic organisms. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2268–2271. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2268-2271.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Miller P. H., Wiggs L. S., Miller J. M. Evaluation of AnaeroGen system for growth of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2388–2391. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2388-2391.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES