Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Sep;35(9):2215–2219. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.9.2215-2219.1997

Comparison of PCR and culture to the indirect fluorescent-antibody test for diagnosis of Potomac horse fever.

J Mott 1, Y Rikihisa 1, Y Zhang 1, S M Reed 1, C Y Yu 1
PMCID: PMC229942  PMID: 9276390

Abstract

Potomac horse fever is an acute systemic equine disease caused by Ehrlichia risticii. Currently, serologic methods are widely used to diagnose this disease. However, serologic methods cannot determine whether the horse is presently infected or has been exposed to ehrlichial antigens in the past. The purpose of the present study was to compare the sensitivities of the nested PCR and cell culture with that of the indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) test for the diagnosis of Potomac horse fever. Blood and fecal specimens serially collected from a pony experimentally infected with E. risticii Maryland, blood specimens serially collected from mice inoculated with E. risticii Ohio 380, and blood and/or fecal specimens collected from 27 horses which had clinical signs compatible with Potomac horse fever were examined. These horses resided in Kentucky, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Vermont. The IFA test titer became positive after 6 days postinoculation (p.i.) for the pony. A culture of the blood of the pony was positive for E. risticii starting on day 1 and was positive through day 28 p.i. By the nested PCR, E. risticii was detectable in the blood and feces of the pony starting on day 1 and was detectable through day 32 p.i. E. risticii was detected in the blood of subclinically infected mice by the nested PCR. Twenty-two clinical specimens were seropositive for E. risticii by the IFA test, with titers ranging from 1:20 to 1:1,280. E. risticii was cultured from 95% (20 of 21) of seropositive clinical blood specimens. E. risticii was detected in the blood by PCR in 81% (17 of 20) of the culture-positive clinical specimens. The study indicated that the nested PCR is as sensitive as culture for detecting infection with E. risticii.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (884.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atwill E. R., Mohammed H. O., Dubovi E., Lopez J. Retrospective evaluation of factors associated with the risk of seropositivity to Ehrlichia risticii in horses in New York State. Am J Vet Res. 1992 Oct;53(10):1931–1934. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlough J. E., Rikihisa Y., Madigan J. E. Nested polymerase chain reaction for detection of Ehrlichia risticii genomic DNA in infected horses. Vet Parasitol. 1997 Mar;68(4):367–373. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(96)01083-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biswas B., Vemulapalli R., Dutta S. K. Detection of Ehrlichia risticii from feces of infected horses by immunomagnetic separation and PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2147–2151. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2147-2151.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chaichanasiriwithaya W., Rikihisa Y., Yamamoto S., Reed S., Crawford T. B., Perryman L. E., Palmer G. H. Antigenic, morphologic, and molecular characterization of new Ehrlichia risticii isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Dec;32(12):3026–3033. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.12.3026-3033.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dutta S. K., Myrup A. C., Rice R. M., Robl M. G., Hammond R. C. Experimental reproduction of Potomac horse fever in horses with a newly isolated Ehrlichia organism. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Aug;22(2):265–269. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.265-269.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goetz T. E., Holland C. J., Dawson J. E., Ristic M., Skibbe K., Keegan K. G., Johnson P. J., Schaeffer D. J., Baker G. J. Monthly prevalence (in 1986) of antibody titers against equine monocytic ehrlichiosis in apparently healthy horses in Illinois. Am J Vet Res. 1989 Nov;50(11):1936–1939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Holland C. J., Ristic M., Cole A. I., Johnson P., Baker G., Goetz T. Isolation, experimental transmission, and characterization of causative agent of Potomac horse fever. Science. 1985 Feb 1;227(4686):522–524. doi: 10.1126/science.3880925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Madigan J. E., Rikihisa Y., Palmer J. E., DeRock E., Mott J. Evidence for a high rate of false-positive results with the indirect fluorescent antibody test for Ehrlichia risticii antibody in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995 Dec 1;207(11):1448–1453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Palmer J. E., Benson C. E. Studies on oral transmission of Potomac horse fever. J Vet Intern Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;8(2):87–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1994.tb03203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Palmer J. E. Prevention of Potomac horse fever. Cornell Vet. 1989 Jul;79(3):201–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pretzman C. I., Rikihisa Y., Ralph D., Gordon J. C., Bech-Nielsen S. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Potomac horse fever disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Jan;25(1):31–36. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.1.31-36.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rikihisa Y., Johnson G. C., Burger C. J. Reduced immune responsiveness and lymphoid depletion in mice infected with Ehrlichia risticii. Infect Immun. 1987 Sep;55(9):2215–2222. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.9.2215-2222.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rikihisa Y., Perry B. D. Causative ehrlichial organisms in Potomac horse fever. Infect Immun. 1985 Sep;49(3):513–517. doi: 10.1128/iai.49.3.513-517.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rikihisa Y., Perry B. D., Cordes D. O. Ultrastructural study of ehrlichial organisms in the large colons of ponies infected with Potomac horse fever. Infect Immun. 1985 Sep;49(3):505–512. doi: 10.1128/iai.49.3.505-512.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rikihisa Y., Pretzman C. I., Johnson G. C., Reed S. M., Yamamoto S., Andrews F. Clinical, histopathological, and immunological responses of ponies to Ehrlichia sennetsu and subsequent Ehrlichia risticii challenge. Infect Immun. 1988 Nov;56(11):2960–2966. doi: 10.1128/iai.56.11.2960-2966.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rikihisa Y., Reed S. M., Sams R. A., Gordon J. C., Pretzman C. I. Serosurvey of horses with evidence of equine monocytic ehrlichiosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990 Nov 15;197(10):1327–1332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rikihisa Y., Wada R., Reed S. M., Yamamoto S. Development of neutralizing antibody in horses infected with Ehrlichia risticii. Vet Microbiol. 1993 Jul;36(1-2):139–147. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(93)90135-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ristic M., Holland C. J., Dawson J. E., Sessions J., Palmer J. Diagnosis of equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Potomac horse fever) by indirect immunofluorescence. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1986 Jul 1;189(1):39–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vemulapalli R., Biswas B., Dutta S. K. Pathogenic, immunologic, and molecular differences between two Ehrlichia risticii strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Nov;33(11):2987–2993. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.2987-2993.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Weiss E., Dasch G. A., Kang Y. H., Westfall H. N. Substrate utilization by Ehrlichia sennetsu and Ehrlichia risticii separated from host constituents by renografin gradient centrifugation. J Bacteriol. 1988 Nov;170(11):5012–5017. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.11.5012-5017.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wen B., Rikihisa Y., Fuerst P. A., Chaichanasiriwithaya W. Diversity of 16S rRNA genes of new Ehrlichia strains isolated from horses with clinical signs of Potomac horse fever. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995 Apr;45(2):315–318. doi: 10.1099/00207713-45-2-315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wen B., Rikihisa Y., Mott J. M., Greene R., Kim H. Y., Zhi N., Couto G. C., Unver A., Bartsch R. Comparison of nested PCR with immunofluorescent-antibody assay for detection of Ehrlichia canis infection in dogs treated with doxycycline. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jul;35(7):1852–1855. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.7.1852-1855.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES