Abstract
Recovery rates of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and the mean time to their detection from clinical specimens were determined by using the fluorescent BACTEC 9000 MB system. Data were compared to those assessed by the radiometric BACTEC 460 system and by cultivation on solid media. A total of 3,095 specimens were processed with N-acetyl-L-cysteine-NaOH by two laboratories. The contamination rates for the BACTEC 9000 MB system were 6.8% (center 1) and 9.8% (center 2). A total of 451 mycobacterial isolates were detected (Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, n = 296; nontuberculous mycobacteria [NTM], n = 155). These isolates originated from 94 (20.8%) smear-positive and 357 (79.2%) smear-negative specimens. The BACTEC 9000 MB system was significantly better than solid media (P < 0.05) in detecting AFB, but it was less efficient than the radiometric system (P < 0.01). The BACTEC 9000 MB system plus solid media (combination A) recovered 393 (87.1%) of the isolates, while the BACTEC 460 system plus solid media (combination B) detected 430 (95.3%) of all AFB isolates. Between combination A and B there was no statistically significant difference for the detection of isolates from smear-positive specimens (P > 0.05), in contrast to the recovery of AFB from smear-negative specimens for M. tuberculosis complex, P < 0.05; for NTM, P < 0.01). The mean time to detection of M. tuberculosis complex was 12.2 days for smear-positive specimens and 18.1 days for smear-negative specimens with the BACTEC 9000 MB system; 9.3 and 15.6 days, respectively, with the BACTEC 460 system; and 21.2 and 28.4 days, respectively, with solid media. For NTM, the average detection times were 15.1, 17.3, and 31.3 days by the three methods, respectively. In conclusion, the BACTEC 9000 MB system is a rapid, less labor-intensive detection system which allows for higher levels of recovery of AFB than solid media. There is no risk of cross contamination, which is known to be the case for the BACTEC 460 system, and data management is greatly facilitated. As a whole, however, the BACTEC 9000 MB system should only be used in conjunction with solid media.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (154.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bird B. R., Denniston M. M., Huebner R. E., Good R. C. Changing practices in mycobacteriology: a follow-up survey of state and territorial public health laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Mar;34(3):554–559. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.3.554-559.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conville P. S., Witebsky F. G. Inter-bottle transfer of mycobacteria by the BACTEC 460. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep-Oct;12(5):401–405. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90110-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirschner P., Springer B., Vogel U., Meier A., Wrede A., Kiekenbeck M., Bange F. C., Böttger E. C. Genotypic identification of mycobacteria by nucleic acid sequence determination: report of a 2-year experience in a clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):2882–2889. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.2882-2889.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palaci M., Ueki S. Y., Sato D. N., Da Silva Telles M. A., Curcio M., Silva E. A. Evaluation of mycobacteria growth indicator tube for recovery and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Mar;34(3):762–764. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.3.762-764.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfyffer G. E., Welscher H. M., Kissling P., Cieslak C., Casal M. J., Gutierrez J., Rüsch-Gerdes S. Comparison of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) with radiometric and solid culture for recovery of acid-fast bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Feb;35(2):364–368. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.2.364-368.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfyffer G. E., Welscher H. M., Kissling P. Pretreatment of clinical specimens with sodium dodecyl (lauryl) sulfate is not suitable for the mycobacteria growth indicator tube cultivation method. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):2142–2144. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2142-2144.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sewell D. L., Rashad A. L., Rourke W. J., Jr, Poor S. L., McCarthy J. A., Pfaller M. A. Comparison of the Septi-Chek AFB and BACTEC systems and conventional culture for recovery of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2689–2691. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2689-2691.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Styrt B. A., Shinnick T. M., Ridderhof J. C., Crawford J. T., Tenover F. C. Turnaround times for mycobacterial cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Apr;35(4):1041–1042. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.1041-1042.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vannier A. M., Tarrand J. J., Murray P. R. Mycobacterial cross contamination during radiometric culturing. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Sep;26(9):1867–1868. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.9.1867-1868.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson M. L., Stone B. L., Hildred M. V., Reves R. R. Comparison of recovery rates for mycobacteria from BACTEC 12B vials, Middlebrook 7H11-selective 7H11 biplates, and Lowenstein Jensen slants in a public health mycobacteriology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2516–2518. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2516-2518.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woods G. L., Fish G., Plaunt M., Murphy T. Clinical evaluation of difco ESP culture system II for growth and detection of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jan;35(1):121–124. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.121-124.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Griethuysen A. J., Jansz A. R., Buiting A. G. Comparison of fluorescent BACTEC 9000 MB system, Septi-Chek AFB system, and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for detection of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Oct;34(10):2391–2394. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.10.2391-2394.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]