Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Oct;35(10):2444–2449. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.10.2444-2449.1997

Comparative evaluation of use of cna, fnbA, fnbB, and hlb for genomic fingerprinting in the epidemiological typing of Staphylococcus aureus.

M S Smeltzer 1, A F Gillaspy 1, F L Pratt 1, M D Thames 1
PMCID: PMC229989  PMID: 9316886

Abstract

We used a genomic fingerprinting protocol to characterize 59 Staphylococcus aureus strains and a single S. intermedius isolate, all of which were previously typed by 13 different methods (F. C. Tenover et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:407-415, 1994). These 60 strains were divided into three groups of 20 strains each, with each group including internal controls. Two of the three groups (groups SB and SC) included 29 strains from four relatively well-defined outbreaks. The epidemiological relationships of the strains in the third group (group SA) were unclear. Fingerprints were established by Southern blotting with HaeIII-digested genomic DNA and a probe mixture consisting of DNA fragments corresponding to the S. aureus collagen adhesin (cna), fibronectin-binding protein (fnbA and fnbB), and beta-toxin (hlb) genes. An unambiguous fingerprint was obtained for all S. aureus isolates. No hybridization signal was observed with S. intermedius. Twenty-seven of the 29 related strains in the SB and SC groups were correctly identified as belonging to one of the four epidemiologically related groups. Our protocol was less successful with respect to the exclusion of unrelated strains. Specifically, only 6 of 11 unrelated strains in the SB and SC groups had a fingerprint that was distinct by comparison to the fingerprints of the outbreak strains. Nevertheless, our protocol was relatively accurate by comparison to the accuracies of the other methods and was one of only six methods that accurately identified all of the repetitive strains included as internal controls.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (815.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gillaspy A. F., Hickmon S. G., Skinner R. A., Thomas J. R., Nelson C. L., Smeltzer M. S. Role of the accessory gene regulator (agr) in pathogenesis of staphylococcal osteomyelitis. Infect Immun. 1995 Sep;63(9):3373–3380. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.9.3373-3380.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kreiswirth B., Kornblum J., Arbeit R. D., Eisner W., Maslow J. N., McGeer A., Low D. E., Novick R. P. Evidence for a clonal origin of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Science. 1993 Jan 8;259(5092):227–230. doi: 10.1126/science.8093647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Smeltzer M. S., Pratt F. L., Gillaspy A. F., Young L. A. Genomic fingerprinting for epidemiological differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jun;34(6):1364–1372. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.6.1364-1372.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tenover F. C., Arbeit R., Archer G., Biddle J., Byrne S., Goering R., Hancock G., Hébert G. A., Hill B., Hollis R. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):407–415. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.407-415.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES