Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Oct;35(10):2634–2638. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.10.2634-2638.1997

Advantage of combining resin with lytic BACTEC blood culture media.

P Rohner 1, B Pepey 1, R Auckenthaler 1
PMCID: PMC230024  PMID: 9316921

Abstract

The BACTEC 9240 (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.) automated blood culture system is based on the continuous monitoring of CO2 production by means of a fluorescent sensor attached to the bottom of a culture vial. We compared two media for this system, resin-containing Plus aerobic/F and Lytic anaerobic/F. Sets of Plus aerobic/F and Lytic anaerobic/F vials inoculated with similar volumes (9 +/- 2.5 ml) were evaluated. In the laboratory, the vials were introduced into the system in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturer and incubated at 35 degrees C for 5 days. A total of 10,914 sets consisting of two bottles each were obtained from 3,674 patients (2.97 cultures per patient). Of these, 1,233 (11%) were culture positive, including 1,074 (10%) yielding at least one pathogen, and 178 (2%) were contaminated. A total of 1,135 isolates were considered clinically relevant in 624 septic episodes; we isolated 894 from Plus aerobic/F and 852 from Lytic anaerobic/F (P = 0.06 [not significant]). More S. aureus isolates (P = 0.05), Pseudomonas spp. (P < 0.0001), other gram-negative bacteria (P = 0.004), and yeasts (P < 0.0001) were isolated from Plus aerobic/F medium, but more streptococci (P < 0.0001), E. coli (P = 0.02) strains and anaerobes (P < 0.0001) were detected with Lytic anaerobic/F medium. Lytic anaerobic/F vials were significantly (P < 0.0001) more often positive at least 6 h before Plus aerobic/F vials (n = 112 versus 52, respectively). Significantly more (P < 0.0001) Plus aerobic/F vials (n = 210; 1.9%) than Lytic anaerobic/F vials (n = 42; 0.4%) were unconfirmed positives. Plus aerobic/F and Lytic anaerobic/F proved to be a valuable pair of blood culture media. Plus aerobic/F performs better for patients under antibiotic treatment, due to the antimicrobial-neutralizing effect of resins. For patients without antibiotic therapy, more microorganisms could be isolated from Lytic anaerobic/F due to cell lysis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brannon P., Kiehn T. E. Clinical comparison of lysis-centrifugation and radiometric resin systems for blood culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Nov;24(5):886–887. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.5.886-887.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cockerill F. R., 3rd, Hughes J. G., Vetter E. A., Mueller R. A., Weaver A. L., Ilstrup D. M., Rosenblatt J. E., Wilson W. R. Analysis of 281,797 consecutive blood cultures performed over an eight-year period: trends in microorganisms isolated and the value of anaerobic culture of blood. Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Mar;24(3):403–418. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doern G. V., Gantz N. M. Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy: an evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device and 16B medium. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jul;18(1):43–48. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.43-48.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hopfer R. L., Moore D. G., Fainstein V., Watkins S., Wenglar M. Routine use of BACTEC 16B bottles to remove antibacterial and antitumor agents from blood cultures of cancer patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):759–764. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.759-764.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jorgensen J. H., Mirrett S., McDonald L. C., Murray P. R., Weinstein M. P., Fune J., Trippy C. W., Masterson M., Reller L. B. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of BACTEC plus aerobic/F resin medium with BacT/Alert aerobic FAN medium for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jan;35(1):53–58. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.53-58.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kelly M. T., Roberts F. J., Henry D., Geere I., Smith J. A. Clinical comparison of isolator and BACTEC 660 resin media for blood culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1925–1927. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1925-1927.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kirkley B. A., Easley K. A., Washington J. A. Controlled clinical evaluation of Isolator and ESP aerobic blood culture systems for detection of bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jun;32(6):1547–1549. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.6.1547-1549.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koontz F. P., Flint K. K., Reynolds J. K., Allen S. D. Multicenter comparison of the high volume (10 ml) NR BACTEC PLUS system and the standard (5 ml) NR BACTEC system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Mar-Apr;14(2):111–118. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90044-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marchandin H., Compan B., Simeon De Buochberg M., Despaux E., Perez C. Detection kinetics for positive blood culture bottles by using the VITAL automated system. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Aug;33(8):2098–2101. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.8.2098-2101.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McGuire N. M., Kauffman C. A., Hertz C. S., Kovach J. M. Evaluation of the BACTEC antimicrobial removal system for detection of bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):449–451. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.449-451.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murray P. R., Spizzo A. W., Niles A. C. Clinical comparison of the recoveries of bloodstream pathogens in Septi-Chek brain heart infusion broth with saponin, Septi-Chek tryptic soy broth, and the isolator lysis-centrifugation system. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):901–905. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.901-905.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Murray P. R., Traynor P., Hopson D. Critical assessment of blood culture techniques: analysis of recovery of obligate and facultative anaerobes, strict aerobic bacteria, and fungi in aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jun;30(6):1462–1468. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1462-1468.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pohlman J. K., Kirkley B. A., Easley K. A., Basille B. A., Washington J. A. Controlled clinical evaluation of BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and BacT/Alert Aerobic FAN bottles for detection of bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Nov;33(11):2856–2858. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.2856-2858.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pohlman J. K., Kirkley B. A., Easley K. A., Washington J. A. Controlled clinical comparison of Isolator and BACTEC 9240 Aerobic/F resin bottle for detection of bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Oct;33(10):2525–2529. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2525-2529.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rohner P., Burkardt H., Dreismann H., Auckenthaler R. Evaluation of the new improved BHI-lysis blood culture medium for the BCB Roche system. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Aug;10(8):620–624. doi: 10.1007/BF01975812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rohner P., Pepey B., Auckenthaler R. Comparative evaluation of BACTEC aerobic Plus/F and Septi-Chek Release blood culture media. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jan;34(1):126–129. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.1.126-129.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rohner P., Pepey B., Auckenthaler R. Comparison of BacT/Alert with Signal blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Feb;33(2):313–317. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.313-317.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rohner P., Pepey B., Auckenthaler R. Evaluation of two commercial blood culture media for the detection of blood-borne pathogens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Jan;13(1):28–32. doi: 10.1007/BF02026120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sharp S. E., McLaughlin J. C., Goodman J. M., Moore J., Spanos S. M., Keller D. W., 3rd, Poppiti R. J., Jr Clinical assessment of anaerobic isolates from blood cultures. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Jul;17(1):19–22. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90064-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tarrand J. J., Guillot C., Wenglar M., Jackson J., Lajeunesse J. D., Rolston K. V. Clinical comparison of the resin-containing BACTEC 26 Plus and the Isolator 10 blood culturing systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2245–2249. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2245-2249.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Wilson M. L., Harrell L. J., Stratton C. W., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):879–882. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.879-882.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Murphy J. R., Lichtenstein K. A. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):35–53. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES