Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Oct;35(10):2660–2662. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.10.2660-2662.1997

A new medium for the presumptive identification of dermatophytes.

I F Salkin 1, A A Padhye 1, M E Kemna 1
PMCID: PMC230031  PMID: 9316928

Abstract

A new medium, Dermatophyte Identification Medium (DIM) (trade mark pending), was specifically developed to eliminate problems of false-positive results associated with commercially marketed media, such as dermatophyte test medium (DTM). Previous investigations had demonstrated that DTM only partially suppressed growth of nondermatophytes and that several of these nondermatophytic fungi that were morphologically similar to dermatophytes caused false-positive results. Presumptive identification of an unknown isolate as a dermatophyte required only the transfer of a portion of the suspected colony recovered from the specimen to DIM. Positive results, evidenced by a change in the color of the medium, were observed within 24 to 48 h. In studies of over 500 isolates of dermatophytes and common nondermatophyte molds, as well as close to 600 yeast isolates, false-positive results were always associated with bacterial contamination of the mold isolates while false negatives were only observed with occasional isolates of Trichophyton verrucosum. DIM culture was an inexpensive, rapid, and accurate method for the presumptive identification of dermatophytes in the clinical mycology laboratory.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (111.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen A. M., Taplin D., Lowy J. A., Twigg L. Skin infections in Vietnam. Mil Med. 1972 Aug;137(8):295–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carroll H. F. Evaluation of dermatophyte test medium for diagnosis of dermatophytosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1974 Jul 15;165(2):192–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Salkin I. F. Dermatrophye test medium: evaluation with nondermatophytic pathogens. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Aug;26(2):134–137. doi: 10.1128/am.26.2.134-137.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sinski J. T., Kelley L. M., Flynt P. M., Miegel J. Dermatophyte isolation media: quantitative appraisal using skin scales infected with Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton rubrum. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Jan;5(1):34–38. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.1.34-38.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sinski J. T., Pokrifchak J. S., Kelley L. M. Quantitative assay of dermatophyte-infected guinea pig skin scales. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Feb;1(2):150–153. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.2.150-153.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sinski J. T., Swanson J. R., Kelley L. M. Dermatophyte test medium: clinical and quantitative appraisal. J Invest Dermatol. 1972 Jun;58(6):405–411. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12540744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Taplin D., Zaias N., Rebell G., Blank H. Isolation and recognition of dermatophytes on a new medium (DTM). Arch Dermatol. 1969 Feb;99(2):203–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES