Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Dec;35(12):3078–3081. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3078-3081.1997

Influence of endocervical specimen adequacy on PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

L E Welsh 1, T C Quinn 1, C A Gaydos 1
PMCID: PMC230125  PMID: 9399497

Abstract

The cellular quality of the endocervical swab specimen used for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis may dramatically impact the sensitivity of the diagnostic assay used. An evaluation of the adequacy of 319 endocervical swab specimens from women attending two inner-city sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics, as well as five high school-based family planning clinics, was performed, and the resulting data were compared with the diagnostic results obtained by both Amplicor PCR and Microtrak direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining. The swab from each patient was rolled across the open circular area of a DFA slide and then used to inoculate a transport tube for PCR (Roche), after which the swab was discarded. The slides were stained and examined by epifluorescence microscopy for the presence of C. trachomatis elementary bodies and for the presence and number of cell types to determine specimen adequacy. Cellular adequacy for a cervical swab specimen was defined as the presence of one or more columnar epithelial or metaplastic epithelial cells or the presence of more than 100 erythrocytes per high-power microscopic field. Of the 319 specimens read by DFA, 204 (63.9%) were determined to be adequate. There were 34 (10.7%) positive specimens by DFA and/or PCR. Twenty-nine (9.1%) specimens were positive by PCR, 20 (6.3%) specimens were DFA positive, and 15 (4.7%) were concordantly positive by both tests. The prevalence of chlamydia among adequate specimens was 14.2% (29/204), compared to 4.3% (5/115) for inadequate specimens (P < 0.0001). Variations in specimen quality and the sensitivity of the diagnostic assay used have a significant impact on determining the prevalence of C. trachomatis in a population.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (109.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnes R. C. Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Apr;2(2):119–136. doi: 10.1128/cmr.2.2.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bass C. A., Jungkind D. L., Silverman N. S., Bondi J. M. Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2648–2653. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2648-2653.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bassiri M., Hu H. Y., Domeika M. A., Burczak J., Svensson L. O., Lee H. H., Mårdh P. A. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):898–900. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.898-900.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauwens J. E., Clark A. M., Loeffelholz M. J., Herman S. A., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men by polymerase chain reaction assay of first-catch urine. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):3013–3016. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.3013-3016.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauwens J. E., Clark A. M., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):3023–3027. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.3023-3027.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bobo L., Coutlee F., Yolken R. H., Quinn T., Viscidi R. P. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1968–1973. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1968-1973.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buimer M., van Doornum G. J., Ching S., Peerbooms P. G., Plier P. K., Ram D., Lee H. H. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction-based assays with clinical specimens from various sites: implications for diagnostic testing and screening. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Oct;34(10):2395–2400. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.10.2395-2400.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cates W., Jr, Rolfs R. T., Jr, Aral S. O. Sexually transmitted diseases, pelvic inflammatory disease, and infertility: an epidemiologic update. Epidemiol Rev. 1990;12:199–220. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chernesky M. A., Jang D., Lee H., Burczak J. D., Hu H., Sellors J., Tomazic-Allen S. J., Mahony J. B. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2682–2685. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2682-2685.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chernesky M. A., Lee H., Schachter J., Burczak J. D., Stamm W. E., McCormack W. M., Quinn T. C. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic men by testing first-void urine in a ligase chain reaction assay. J Infect Dis. 1994 Nov;170(5):1308–1311. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.5.1308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dille B. J., Butzen C. C., Birkenmeyer L. G. Amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Mar;31(3):729–731. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.3.729-731.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Domeika M., Bassiri M., Mårdh P. A. Diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic males by testing urine by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2350–2352. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2350-2352.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jaschek G., Gaydos C. A., Welsh L. E., Quinn T. C. Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1209–1212. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1209-1212.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kellogg J. A., Seiple J. W., Klinedinst J. L., Levisky J. S. Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991 Dec;115(12):1223–1227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kellogg J. A., Seiple J. W., Klinedinst J. L., Stroll E. S., Cavanaugh S. H. Improved PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by using an altered method of specimen transport and high-quality endocervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Oct;33(10):2765–2767. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2765-2767.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kellogg J. A., Seiple J. W., Murray C. L., Levisky J. S. Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1108–1113. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1108-1113.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee H. H., Chernesky M. A., Schachter J., Burczak J. D., Andrews W. W., Muldoon S., Leckie G., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine. Lancet. 1995 Jan 28;345(8944):213–216. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90221-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Loeffelholz M. J., Lewinski C. A., Silver S. R., Purohit A. P., Herman S. A., Buonagurio D. A., Dragon E. A. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2847–2851. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2847-2851.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Phillips R. S., Hanff P. A., Kauffman R. S., Aronson M. D. Use of a direct fluorescent antibody test for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection in women seeking routine gynecologic care. J Infect Dis. 1987 Oct;156(4):575–581. doi: 10.1093/infdis/156.4.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schachter J., Moncada J., Whidden R., Shaw H., Bolan G., Burczak J. D., Lee H. H. Noninvasive tests for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: application of ligase chain reaction to first-catch urine specimens of women. J Infect Dis. 1995 Nov;172(5):1411–1414. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.5.1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schachter J., Stamm W. E., Quinn T. C., Andrews W. W., Burczak J. D., Lee H. H. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2540–2543. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2540-2543.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stary A., Tomazic-Allen S., Choueiri B., Burczak J., Steyrer K., Lee H. Comparison of DNA amplification methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic military recruits. Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Mar-Apr;23(2):97–102. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199603000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. van Doornum G. J., Buimer M., Prins M., Henquet C. J., Coutinho R. A., Plier P. K., Tomazic-Allen S., Hu H., Lee H. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Aug;33(8):2042–2047. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.8.2042-2047.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES