Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Dec;35(12):3186–3191. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3186-3191.1997

Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Anaerobe identification system.

J J Cavallaro 1, L S Wiggs 1, J M Miller 1
PMCID: PMC230145  PMID: 9399517

Abstract

The BBL Crystal Anaerobe (ANR) identification system was evaluated, and the results were compared with those from conventional anaerobic methods. We tested 322 clinically significant anaerobic bacteria according to the manufacturer's instructions. The system identified correctly 286 of 322 (88.8%) of the anaerobic bacteria tested. Of these, 263 of 322 (81.7%) were identified correctly on initial testing and 49 were identified correctly only to the genus level; on repeat testing, 23 of 49 (46.9%) were identified correctly to both the genus and the species levels. A total of 26 (8.5%) were misidentified at the species level, and 10 (3.1%) were not identified. Performance characteristics for individual strains varied. The system correctly identified all tested strains of Campylobacter, Desulfomonas, Desulfovibrio, Leptotrichia, Mobiluncus, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, Provetella, Propionibacterium, Tisierella, and Veillonella and 36 of 37 (97.3%) Actinomyces strains, 42 of 46 (91.3%) B. fragilis group strains, 79 of 103 (76.7%) Clostridium strains, (however, the system failed to identify any of the 7 C. innocuum and 9 C. tetani strains tested), and 8 of 15 (53.3%) Bacteroides strains. This system was easy to use, did not involve the addition of reagents, and was faster than conventional anaerobic procedures. It would be a useful addition to the anaerobe laboratory of most hospitals.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (163.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bate G. Comparison of Minitek Anaerobe II, API An-Ident, and RapID ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile. Am J Clin Pathol. 1986 Jun;85(6):716–718. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/85.6.716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brander M. A., Jousimies-Somer H. R. Evaluation of the RapID ANA II and API ZYM systems for identification of Actinomyces species from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3112–3116. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3112-3116.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burlage R. S., Ellner P. D. Comparison of the PRAS II, AN-Ident, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jul;22(1):32–35. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.1.32-35.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Celig D. M., Schreckenberger P. C. Clinical evaluation of the RapID-ANA II panel for identification of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Mar;29(3):457–462. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.457-462.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Finegold S. M. Anaerobic bacteria. Their role in infection and their management. Postgrad Med. 1987 Jun;81(8):141–147. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1987.11699866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Manafi M., Kneifel W., Bascomb S. Fluorogenic and chromogenic substrates used in bacterial diagnostics. Microbiol Rev. 1991 Sep;55(3):335–348. doi: 10.1128/mr.55.3.335-348.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marler L. M., Siders J. A., Wolters L. C., Pettigrew Y., Skitt B. L., Allen S. D. Evaluation of the new RapID-ANA II system for the identification of clinical anaerobic isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):874–878. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.874-878.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marler L., Allen S., Siders J. Rapid enzymatic characterization of clinically encountered anaerobic bacteria with the API ZYM system. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Aug;3(4):294–300. doi: 10.1007/BF01977476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller P. H., Wiggs L. S., Miller J. M. Evaluation of API An-IDENT and RapID ANA II systems for identification of Actinomyces species from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Feb;33(2):329–330. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.329-330.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schreckenberger P. C., Celig D. M., Janda W. M. Clinical evaluation of the Vitek ANI card for identification of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Feb;26(2):225–230. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.2.225-230.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stenson M. J., Lee D. T., Rosenblatt J. E., Contezac J. M. Evaluation of the AnIdent system for the identification of anaerobic bacteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 May;5(1):9–15. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES