Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Dec;35(12):3355–3357. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3355-3357.1997

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples by nucleic acid tests: comparison with culture and enzyme immunoassay of genital swab specimens.

S Schepetiuk 1, T Kok 1, L Martin 1, R Waddell 1, G Higgins 1
PMCID: PMC230187  PMID: 9399559

Abstract

Two commercially available nucleic acid-based tests, ligase chain reaction (LCR; Abbott Laboratories) and PCR (Roche Diagnostics), for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male and female urine samples were compared with culture and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Microtrak; Syva) for C. trachomatis detection in genital samples. The samples were collected from 1,005 patients who attended a sexually transmitted disease clinic. In this study population, the prevalence of the infection was 4%. Specimens which were reactive in any of the tests were retested with a different PCR test using primers directed against the major outer membrane protein gene. With a "gold standard" of a positive culture, or any other positive test result if it was confirmed by an independent test, the Roche PCR (95% sensitive, 99.9% specific) was more sensitive than the LCR (75% sensitive, 100% specific) (chi2, P < 0.0001) while both tests were more sensitive than culture (58% sensitive, 100% specific) or EIA (45% sensitive, 100% specific) (chi2, P < 0.001). The Roche PCR and Abbott LCR tests of urine identified 65% and 30% more positive patients, respectively, than did testing by culture of urethral or cervical specimens. Nucleic acid testing of urine specimens for C. trachomatis is a more sensitive and convenient method for the detection of genital infection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (118.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caldwell H. D., Kromhout J., Schachter J. Purification and partial characterization of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun. 1981 Mar;31(3):1161–1176. doi: 10.1128/iai.31.3.1161-1176.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chernesky M. A., Chong S., Jang D., Luinstra K., Sellors J., Mahony J. B. Ability of commercial ligase chain reaction and PCR assays to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men by testing first-void urine. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Apr;35(4):982–984. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.982-984.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dutilh B., Bébéar C., Rodriguez P., Vekris A., Bonnet J., Garret M. Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction. Res Microbiol. 1989 Jan;140(1):7–16. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(89)90053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Garland S. M., Gertig D. M., McInnes J. A. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Australia. Med J Aust. 1993 Jul 19;159(2):90–96. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb137742.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goessens W. H., Kluytmans J. A., den Toom N., van Rijsoort-Vos T. H., Niesters B. G., Stolz E., Verbrugh H. A., Quint W. G. Influence of volume of sample processed on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital samples by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):251–253. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.251-253.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kok T. W., Payne L. E., Bailey S. E., Waddell R. G. Urine and the laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in males. Genitourin Med. 1993 Feb;69(1):51–53. doi: 10.1136/sti.69.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kuo C., Wang S., Wentworth B. B., Grayston J. T. Primary isolation of TRIC organisms in HeLa 229 cells treated with DEAE-dextran. J Infect Dis. 1972 Jun;125(6):665–668. doi: 10.1093/infdis/125.6.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee H. H., Chernesky M. A., Schachter J., Burczak J. D., Andrews W. W., Muldoon S., Leckie G., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine. Lancet. 1995 Jan 28;345(8944):213–216. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90221-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Loeffelholz M. J., Lewinski C. A., Silver S. R., Purohit A. P., Herman S. A., Buonagurio D. A., Dragon E. A. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2847–2851. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2847-2851.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mahony J. B., Luinstra K. E., Sellors J. W., Chernesky M. A. Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jul;31(7):1753–1758. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1753-1758.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mahony J. B., Luinstra K. E., Sellors J. W., Pickard L., Chong S., Jang D., Chernesky M. A. Role of confirmatory PCRs in determining performance of Chlamydia Amplicor PCR with endocervical specimens from women with a low prevalence of infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2490–2493. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2490-2493.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miettinen A., Vuorinen P., Varis T., Hällström O. Comparison of enzyme immunoassay antigen detection, nucleic acid hybridization and PCR assay in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 Jun;14(6):546–549. doi: 10.1007/BF02113438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moncada J., Schachter J., Shafer M. A., Williams E., Gourlay L., Lavin B., Bolan G. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first catch urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic males. Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Jan-Feb;21(1):8–12. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199401000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Palmer L., Falkow S. A common plasmid of Chlamydia trachomatis. Plasmid. 1986 Jul;16(1):52–62. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(86)90079-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pasternack R., Vuorinen P., Pitkäjärvi T., Koskela M., Miettinen A. Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Feb;35(2):402–405. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.2.402-405.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schachter J., Stamm W. E., Quinn T. C., Andrews W. W., Burczak J. D., Lee H. H. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2540–2543. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2540-2543.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stary A., Tomazic-Allen S., Choueiri B., Burczak J., Steyrer K., Lee H. Comparison of DNA amplification methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic military recruits. Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Mar-Apr;23(2):97–102. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199603000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Taylor-Robinson D. Chlamydia trachomatis and sexually transmitted disease. BMJ. 1994 Jan 15;308(6922):150–151. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6922.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thomas B. J., MacLeod E. J., Taylor-Robinson D. Evaluation of sensitivity of 10 diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis by use of a simple laboratory procedure. J Clin Pathol. 1993 May;46(5):408–410. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.5.408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Toye B., Peeling R. W., Jessamine P., Claman P., Gemmill I. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic men and women by PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jun;34(6):1396–1400. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.6.1396-1400.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. de Barbeyrac B., Rodriguez P., Dutilh B., Le Roux P., Bébéar C. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction compared with polymerase chain reaction and cell culture in urogenital specimens. Genitourin Med. 1995 Dec;71(6):382–386. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.6.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. de Barbeyrac B., Rodriguez P., Dutilh B., Le Roux P., Bébéar C. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction compared with polymerase chain reaction and cell culture in urogenital specimens. Genitourin Med. 1995 Dec;71(6):382–386. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.6.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES