Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1995 Jun;15(6):3318–3326. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.6.3318

Sequence-specific targeting of nuclear signal transduction pathways by homeodomain proteins.

D A Grueneberg 1, K J Simon 1, K Brennan 1, M Gilman 1
PMCID: PMC230565  PMID: 7760827

Abstract

Cells translate extracellular signals into specific programs of gene expression that reflect their developmental history or identity. We present evidence that one way this interpretation may be performed is by cooperative interactions between serum response factor (SRF) and certain homeodomain proteins. We show that human and Drosophila homeodomain proteins of the paired class have the ability to recruit SRF to DNA sequences not efficiently recognized by SRF on its own, thereby imparting to a linked reporter gene the potential to respond to polypeptide growth factors. This activity requires both the DNA-binding activity of the homeodomain and putative protein-protein contact residues on the exposed surfaces of homeodomain helices 1 and 2. The ability of the homeodomain to impart signal responsiveness is DNA sequence specific, and this specificity differs from the simple DNA-binding specificity of the homeodomain in vitro. The homeodomain imparts response to a spectrum of signals characteristic of the natural SRF-binding site in the c-fos gene. Response to some of these signals is dependent on the secondary recruitment of SRF-dependent ternary complex factors, and we show directly that a homeodomain can promote the recruitment of one such factor, Elk1. We infer that SRF and homeodomains interact cooperatively on DNA and that formation of SRF-homeodomain complexes permits the recruitment of signal-responsive SRF accessory proteins. The ability to route extracellular signals to specific target genes is a novel activity of the homeodomain, which may contribute to the identity function displayed by many homeodomain genes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (477.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bender A., Sprague G. F., Jr MAT alpha 1 protein, a yeast transcription activator, binds synergistically with a second protein to a set of cell-type-specific genes. Cell. 1987 Aug 28;50(5):681–691. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90326-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bender A., Sprague G. F., Jr Yeast peptide pheromones, a-factor and alpha-factor, activate a common response mechanism in their target cells. Cell. 1986 Dec 26;47(6):929–937. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90808-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkowitz L. A., Riabowol K. T., Gilman M. Z. Multiple sequence elements of a single functional class are required for cyclic AMP responsiveness of the mouse c-fos promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;9(10):4272–4281. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.10.4272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunner D., Oellers N., Szabad J., Biggs W. H., 3rd, Zipursky S. L., Hafen E. A gain-of-function mutation in Drosophila MAP kinase activates multiple receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. Cell. 1994 Mar 11;76(5):875–888. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90362-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan S. K., Jaffe L., Capovilla M., Botas J., Mann R. S. The DNA binding specificity of Ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):603–615. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90525-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan S. K., Mann R. S. The segment identity functions of Ultrabithorax are contained within its homeo domain and carboxy-terminal sequences. Genes Dev. 1993 May;7(5):796–811. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.5.796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cleary M. A., Stern S., Tanaka M., Herr W. Differential positive control by Oct-1 and Oct-2: activation of a transcriptionally silent motif through Oct-1 and VP16 corecruitment. Genes Dev. 1993 Jan;7(1):72–83. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.1.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coen E. S., Meyerowitz E. M. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature. 1991 Sep 5;353(6339):31–37. doi: 10.1038/353031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cordon-Cardo C., Tapley P., Jing S. Q., Nanduri V., O'Rourke E., Lamballe F., Kovary K., Klein R., Jones K. R., Reichardt L. F. The trk tyrosine protein kinase mediates the mitogenic properties of nerve growth factor and neurotrophin-3. Cell. 1991 Jul 12;66(1):173–183. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90149-s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dalton S., Treisman R. Characterization of SAP-1, a protein recruited by serum response factor to the c-fos serum response element. Cell. 1992 Feb 7;68(3):597–612. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90194-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Diaz-Benjumea F. J., Hafen E. The sevenless signalling cassette mediates Drosophila EGF receptor function during epidermal development. Development. 1994 Mar;120(3):569–578. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.3.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Doyle H. J., Bishop J. M. Torso, a receptor tyrosine kinase required for embryonic pattern formation, shares substrates with the sevenless and EGF-R pathways in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1993 Apr;7(4):633–646. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.4.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gibson G., Schier A., LeMotte P., Gehring W. J. The specificities of Sex combs reduced and Antennapedia are defined by a distinct portion of each protein that includes the homeodomain. Cell. 1990 Sep 21;62(6):1087–1103. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90386-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gilman M. Z. The c-fos serum response element responds to protein kinase C-dependent and -independent signals but not to cyclic AMP. Genes Dev. 1988 Apr;2(4):394–402. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.4.394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilman M. Z., Wilson R. N., Weinberg R. A. Multiple protein-binding sites in the 5'-flanking region regulate c-fos expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;6(12):4305–4316. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.12.4305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Graham R., Gilman M. Distinct protein targets for signals acting at the c-fos serum response element. Science. 1991 Jan 11;251(4990):189–192. doi: 10.1126/science.1898992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grueneberg D. A., Natesan S., Alexandre C., Gilman M. Z. Human and Drosophila homeodomain proteins that enhance the DNA-binding activity of serum response factor. Science. 1992 Aug 21;257(5073):1089–1095. doi: 10.1126/science.257.5073.1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hanes S. D., Brent R. A genetic model for interaction of the homeodomain recognition helix with DNA. Science. 1991 Jan 25;251(4992):426–430. doi: 10.1126/science.1671176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hayashi S., Scott M. P. What determines the specificity of action of Drosophila homeodomain proteins? Cell. 1990 Nov 30;63(5):883–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90492-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Herrera R. E., Shaw P. E., Nordheim A. Occupation of the c-fos serum response element in vivo by a multi-protein complex is unaltered by growth factor induction. Nature. 1989 Jul 6;340(6228):68–70. doi: 10.1038/340068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hill C. S., Marais R., John S., Wynne J., Dalton S., Treisman R. Functional analysis of a growth factor-responsive transcription factor complex. Cell. 1993 Apr 23;73(2):395–406. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90238-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hipskind R. A., Rao V. N., Mueller C. G., Reddy E. S., Nordheim A. Ets-related protein Elk-1 is homologous to the c-fos regulatory factor p62TCF. Nature. 1991 Dec 19;354(6354):531–534. doi: 10.1038/354531a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ho C. Y., Adamson J. G., Hodges R. S., Smith M. Heterodimerization of the yeast MATa1 and MAT alpha 2 proteins is mediated by two leucine zipper-like coiled-coil motifs. EMBO J. 1994 Mar 15;13(6):1403–1413. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06394.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jarvis E. E., Hagen D. C., Sprague G. F., Jr Identification of a DNA segment that is necessary and sufficient for alpha-specific gene control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications for regulation of alpha-specific and a-specific genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Jan;8(1):309–320. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.1.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Keleher C. A., Goutte C., Johnson A. D. The yeast cell-type-specific repressor alpha 2 acts cooperatively with a non-cell-type-specific protein. Cell. 1988 Jun 17;53(6):927–936. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)90449-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kissinger C. R., Liu B. S., Martin-Blanco E., Kornberg T. B., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 A resolution: a framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):579–590. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90453-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kornberg T. B. Understanding the homeodomain. J Biol Chem. 1993 Dec 25;268(36):26813–26816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kunkel T. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(2):488–492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuziora M. A., McGinnis W. A homeodomain substitution changes the regulatory specificity of the deformed protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):563–571. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. König H. Cell-type specific multiprotein complex formation over the c-fos serum response element in vivo: ternary complex formation is not required for the induction of c-fos. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Jul 11;19(13):3607–3611. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.13.3607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lai J. S., Cleary M. A., Herr W. A single amino acid exchange transfers VP16-induced positive control from the Oct-1 to the Oct-2 homeo domain. Genes Dev. 1992 Nov;6(11):2058–2065. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lin L., McGinnis W. Mapping functional specificity in the Dfd and Ubx homeo domains. Genes Dev. 1992 Jun;6(6):1071–1081. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mak A., Johnson A. D. The carboxy-terminal tail of the homeo domain protein alpha 2 is required for function with a second homeo domain protein. Genes Dev. 1993 Oct;7(10):1862–1870. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.10.1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mann R. S., Hogness D. S. Functional dissection of Ultrabithorax proteins in D. melanogaster. Cell. 1990 Feb 23;60(4):597–610. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90663-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. McGinnis W., Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell. 1992 Jan 24;68(2):283–302. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakayama N., Miyajima A., Arai K. Common signal transduction system shared by STE2 and STE3 in haploid cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: autocrine cell-cycle arrest results from forced expression of STE2. EMBO J. 1987 Jan;6(1):249–254. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04746.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nebreda A. R., Martin-Zanca D., Kaplan D. R., Parada L. F., Santos E. Induction by NGF of meiotic maturation of Xenopus oocytes expressing the trk proto-oncogene product. Science. 1991 Apr 26;252(5005):558–561. doi: 10.1126/science.1850550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Norman C., Runswick M., Pollock R., Treisman R. Isolation and properties of cDNA clones encoding SRF, a transcription factor that binds to the c-fos serum response element. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):989–1003. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90244-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Perrimon N. Signalling pathways initiated by receptor protein tyrosine kinases in Drosophila. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Apr;6(2):260–266. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pollock R., Treisman R. A sensitive method for the determination of protein-DNA binding specificities. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 11;18(21):6197–6204. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.21.6197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pomerantz J. L., Kristie T. M., Sharp P. A. Recognition of the surface of a homeo domain protein. Genes Dev. 1992 Nov;6(11):2047–2057. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Primig M., Winkler H., Ammerer G. The DNA binding and oligomerization domain of MCM1 is sufficient for its interaction with other regulatory proteins. EMBO J. 1991 Dec;10(13):4209–4218. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04999.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rao V. N., Huebner K., Isobe M., ar-Rushdi A., Croce C. M., Reddy E. S. elk, tissue-specific ets-related genes on chromosomes X and 14 near translocation breakpoints. Science. 1989 Apr 7;244(4900):66–70. doi: 10.1126/science.2539641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rauskolb C., Peifer M., Wieschaus E. extradenticle, a regulator of homeotic gene activity, is a homolog of the homeobox-containing human proto-oncogene pbx1. Cell. 1993 Sep 24;74(6):1101–1112. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90731-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rivera V. M., Miranti C. K., Misra R. P., Ginty D. D., Chen R. H., Blenis J., Greenberg M. E. A growth factor-induced kinase phosphorylates the serum response factor at a site that regulates its DNA-binding activity. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Oct;13(10):6260–6273. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.10.6260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schier A. F., Gehring W. J. Functional specificity of the homeodomain protein fushi tarazu: the role of DNA-binding specificity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 15;90(4):1450–1454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schröter H., Mueller C. G., Meese K., Nordheim A. Synergism in ternary complex formation between the dimeric glycoprotein p67SRF, polypeptide p62TCF and the c-fos serum response element. EMBO J. 1990 Apr;9(4):1123–1130. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08218.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schwarz-Sommer Z., Huijser P., Nacken W., Saedler H., Sommer H. Genetic Control of Flower Development by Homeotic Genes in Antirrhinum majus. Science. 1990 Nov 16;250(4983):931–936. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4983.931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Scott M. P., Tamkun J. W., Hartzell G. W., 3rd The structure and function of the homeodomain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989 Jul 28;989(1):25–48. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(89)90033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shaw P. E., Schröter H., Nordheim A. The ability of a ternary complex to form over the serum response element correlates with serum inducibility of the human c-fos promoter. Cell. 1989 Feb 24;56(4):563–572. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90579-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith D. L., Johnson A. D. A molecular mechanism for combinatorial control in yeast: MCM1 protein sets the spacing and orientation of the homeodomains of an alpha 2 dimer. Cell. 1992 Jan 10;68(1):133–142. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90212-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sprague G. F., Jr Combinatorial associations of regulatory proteins and the control of cell type in yeast. Adv Genet. 1990;27:33–62. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60023-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tanaka M., Grossniklaus U., Herr W., Hernandez N. Activation of the U2 snRNA promoter by the octamer motif defines a new class of RNA polymerase II enhancer elements. Genes Dev. 1988 Dec;2(12B):1764–1778. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.12b.1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tanaka M., Herr W. Differential transcriptional activation by Oct-1 and Oct-2: interdependent activation domains induce Oct-2 phosphorylation. Cell. 1990 Feb 9;60(3):375–386. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90589-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Treisman R., Ammerer G. The SRF and MCM1 transcription factors. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1992 Apr;2(2):221–226. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80277-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Treisman R. The SRE: a growth factor responsive transcriptional regulator. Semin Cancer Biol. 1990 Feb;1(1):47–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Vershon A. K., Johnson A. D. A short, disordered protein region mediates interactions between the homeodomain of the yeast alpha 2 protein and the MCM1 protein. Cell. 1993 Jan 15;72(1):105–112. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90054-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wilson D., Sheng G., Lecuit T., Dostatni N., Desplan C. Cooperative dimerization of paired class homeo domains on DNA. Genes Dev. 1993 Nov;7(11):2120–2134. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.11.2120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Xue D., Tu Y., Chalfie M. Cooperative interactions between the Caenorhabditis elegans homeoproteins UNC-86 and MEC-3. Science. 1993 Sep 3;261(5126):1324–1328. doi: 10.1126/science.8103239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zappavigna V., Sartori D., Mavilio F. Specificity of HOX protein function depends on DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions, both mediated by the homeo domain. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 15;8(6):732–744. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zeng W., Andrew D. J., Mathies L. D., Horner M. A., Scott M. P. Ectopic expression and function of the Antp and Scr homeotic genes: the N terminus of the homeodomain is critical to functional specificity. Development. 1993 Jun;118(2):339–352. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.2.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. van Dijk M. A., Murre C. extradenticle raises the DNA binding specificity of homeotic selector gene products. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):617–624. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90526-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES