Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1995 Jul;15(7):3714–3721. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.7.3714

Dioxin induces localized, graded changes in chromatin structure: implications for Cyp1A1 gene transcription.

S T Okino 1, J P Whitlock Jr 1
PMCID: PMC230609  PMID: 7791778

Abstract

In mouse hepatoma cells, the environmental contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD, or dioxin) induces Cyp1A1 gene transcription, a process that requires two basic helix-loop-helix regulatory proteins, the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (Arnt). We have used a ligation-mediated PCR technique to analyze dioxin-induced changes in protein-DNA interactions and chromatin structure of the Cyp1A1 enhancer-promoter in its native chromosomal setting. Dioxin-induced binding of the AhR/Arnt heteromer to enhancer chromatin is associated with a localized (about 200 bp) alteration in chromatin structure that is manifested by increased accessibility of the DNA; these changes probably reflect direct disruption of a nucleosome by AhR/Arnt. Dioxin induces analogous AhR/Arnt-dependent changes in chromatin structure and accessibility at the Cyp1A1 promoter. However, the changes at the promoter must occur by a different, more indirect mechanism, because they are induced from a distance and do not reflect a local effect of AhR/Arnt binding. Dose-response experiments indicate that the changes in chromatin structure at the enhancer and promoter are graded and mirror the graded induction of Cyp1A1 transcription by dioxin. We discuss these results in terms of a TCDD-induced shift in an equilibrium between nucleosomal and nonnucleosomal chromatin configurations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (524.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer T. K., Zaniewski E., Moyer M. L., Nordeen S. K. The differential capacity of glucocorticoids and progestins to alter chromatin structure and induce gene expression in human breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol. 1994 Sep;8(9):1154–1162. doi: 10.1210/mend.8.9.7838148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailar J. C., 3rd How dangerous is dioxin? N Engl J Med. 1991 Jan 24;324(4):260–262. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199101243240409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker P. B. The establishment of active promoters in chromatin. Bioessays. 1994 Aug;16(8):541–547. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burbach K. M., Poland A., Bradfield C. A. Cloning of the Ah-receptor cDNA reveals a distinctive ligand-activated transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):8185–8189. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carr K. D., Richard-Foy H. Glucocorticoids locally disrupt an array of positioned nucleosomes on the rat tyrosine aminotransferase promoter in hepatoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(23):9300–9304. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.23.9300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Conney A. H. Induction of microsomal enzymes by foreign chemicals and carcinogenesis by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: G. H. A. Clowes Memorial Lecture. Cancer Res. 1982 Dec;42(12):4875–4917. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Durrin L. K., Whitlock J. P., Jr 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-inducible aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated change in CYP1A1 chromatin structure occurs independently of transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;9(12):5733–5737. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.12.5733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elferink C. J., Whitlock J. P., Jr 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-inducible, Ah receptor-mediated bending of enhancer DNA. J Biol Chem. 1990 Apr 5;265(10):5718–5721. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ema M., Sogawa K., Watanabe N., Chujoh Y., Matsushita N., Gotoh O., Funae Y., Fujii-Kuriyama Y. cDNA cloning and structure of mouse putative Ah receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992 Apr 15;184(1):246–253. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91185-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fascher K. D., Schmitz J., Hörz W. Role of trans-activating proteins in the generation of active chromatin at the PHO5 promoter in S. cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1990 Aug;9(8):2523–2528. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07432.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Favreau L. V., Pickett C. B. Transcriptional regulation of the rat NAD(P)H:quinone reductase gene. Identification of regulatory elements controlling basal level expression and inducible expression by planar aromatic compounds and phenolic antioxidants. J Biol Chem. 1991 Mar 5;266(7):4556–4561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Felsenfeld G. Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism. Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):219–224. doi: 10.1038/355219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fujii-Kuriyama Y., Imataka H., Sogawa K., Yasumoto K., Kikuchi Y. Regulation of CYP1A1 expression. FASEB J. 1992 Jan 6;6(2):706–710. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.6.2.1537460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Garrity P. A., Wold B. J. Effects of different DNA polymerases in ligation-mediated PCR: enhanced genomic sequencing and in vivo footprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 1;89(3):1021–1025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.3.1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gonzalez F. J. The molecular biology of cytochrome P450s. Pharmacol Rev. 1988 Dec;40(4):243–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gross D. S., Garrard W. T. Nuclease hypersensitive sites in chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1988;57:159–197. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.57.070188.001111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grunstein M. Nucleosomes: regulators of transcription. Trends Genet. 1990 Dec;6(12):395–400. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90299-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hansen J. C., Ausio J. Chromatin dynamics and the modulation of genetic activity. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992 May;17(5):187–191. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90264-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoffman E. C., Reyes H., Chu F. F., Sander F., Conley L. H., Brooks B. A., Hankinson O. Cloning of a factor required for activity of the Ah (dioxin) receptor. Science. 1991 May 17;252(5008):954–958. doi: 10.1126/science.1852076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Israel D. I., Whitlock J. P., Jr Induction of mRNA specific for cytochrome P1-450 in wild type and variant mouse hepatoma cells. J Biol Chem. 1983 Sep 10;258(17):10390–10394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Israel D. I., Whitlock J. P., Jr Regulation of cytochrome P1-450 gene transcription by 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in wild type and variant mouse hepatoma cells. J Biol Chem. 1984 May 10;259(9):5400–5402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jain S., Dolwick K. M., Schmidt J. V., Bradfield C. A. Potent transactivation domains of the Ah receptor and the Ah receptor nuclear translocator map to their carboxyl termini. J Biol Chem. 1994 Dec 16;269(50):31518–31524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones K. W., Whitlock J. P., Jr Functional analysis of the transcriptional promoter for the CYP1A1 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;10(10):5098–5105. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.10.5098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jones P. B., Galeazzi D. R., Fisher J. M., Whitlock J. P., Jr Control of cytochrome P1-450 gene expression by dioxin. Science. 1985 Mar 22;227(4693):1499–1502. doi: 10.1126/science.3856321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim J. L., Nikolov D. B., Burley S. K. Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):520–527. doi: 10.1038/365520a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim Y., Geiger J. H., Hahn S., Sigler P. B. Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):512–520. doi: 10.1038/365512a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kornberg R. D., Lorch Y. Chromatin structure and transcription. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1992;8:563–587. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.003023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee H. L., Archer T. K. Nucleosome-mediated disruption of transcription factor-chromatin initiation complexes at the mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):32–41. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li H., Dong L., Whitlock J. P., Jr Transcriptional activation function of the mouse Ah receptor nuclear translocator. J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 11;269(45):28098–28105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Matsushita N., Sogawa K., Ema M., Yoshida A., Fujii-Kuriyama Y. A factor binding to the xenobiotic responsive element (XRE) of P-4501A1 gene consists of at least two helix-loop-helix proteins, Ah receptor and Arnt. J Biol Chem. 1993 Oct 5;268(28):21002–21006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McGhee J. D., Felsenfeld G. Reaction of nucleosome DNA with dimethyl sulfate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 May;76(5):2133–2137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.5.2133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McPherson C. E., Shim E. Y., Friedman D. S., Zaret K. S. An active tissue-specific enhancer and bound transcription factors existing in a precisely positioned nucleosomal array. Cell. 1993 Oct 22;75(2):387–398. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80079-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Miller A. G., Whitlock J. P., Jr Heterogeneity in the rate of benzo[a]pyrene metabolism in single cells: quantitation using flow cytometry. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;2(6):625–632. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.6.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Morgan J. E., Whitlock J. P., Jr Transcription-dependent and transcription-independent nucleosome disruption induced by dioxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 1;89(23):11622–11626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mueller P. R., Wold B. In vivo footprinting of a muscle specific enhancer by ligation mediated PCR. Science. 1989 Nov 10;246(4931):780–786. doi: 10.1126/science.2814500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mymryk J. S., Berard D., Hager G. L., Archer T. K. Mouse mammary tumor virus chromatin in human breast cancer cells is constitutively hypersensitive and exhibits steroid hormone-independent loading of transcription factors in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jan;15(1):26–34. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.1.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nebert D. W., Jones J. E. Regulation of the mammalian cytochrome P1-450 (CYP1A1) gene. Int J Biochem. 1989;21(3):243–252. doi: 10.1016/0020-711x(89)90182-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Okino S. T., Pendurthi U. R., Tukey R. H. Phorbol esters inhibit the dioxin receptor-mediated transcriptional activation of the mouse Cyp1a-1 and Cyp1a-2 genes by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Biol Chem. 1992 Apr 5;267(10):6991–6998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Paranjape S. M., Kamakaka R. T., Kadonaga J. T. Role of chromatin structure in the regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:265–297. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.001405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pennie W. D., Hager G. L., Smith C. L. Nucleoprotein structure influences the response of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter to activation of the cyclic AMP signalling pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Apr;15(4):2125–2134. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.4.2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pimental R. A., Liang B., Yee G. K., Wilhelmsson A., Poellinger L., Paulson K. E. Dioxin receptor and C/EBP regulate the function of the glutathione S-transferase Ya gene xenobiotic response element. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;13(7):4365–4373. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.4365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Poland A., Knutson J. C. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons: examination of the mechanism of toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1982;22:517–554. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.22.040182.002505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Probst M. R., Reisz-Porszasz S., Agbunag R. V., Ong M. S., Hankinson O. Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein in aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor action. Mol Pharmacol. 1993 Sep;44(3):511–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reyes H., Reisz-Porszasz S., Hankinson O. Identification of the Ah receptor nuclear translocator protein (Arnt) as a component of the DNA binding form of the Ah receptor. Science. 1992 May 22;256(5060):1193–1195. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5060.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Richard-Foy H., Hager G. L. Sequence-specific positioning of nucleosomes over the steroid-inducible MMTV promoter. EMBO J. 1987 Aug;6(8):2321–2328. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02507.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Safe S. H. Comparative toxicology and mechanism of action of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1986;26:371–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.26.040186.002103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Swanson H. I., Bradfield C. A. The AH-receptor: genetics, structure and function. Pharmacogenetics. 1993 Oct;3(5):213–230. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199310000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tanguay R. L., Pfeifer G. P., Riggs A. D. PCR-aided DNaseI footprinting of single copy gene sequences in permeabilized cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Oct 11;18(19):5902–5902. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.19.5902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wallrath L. L., Lu Q., Granok H., Elgin S. C. Architectural variations of inducible eukaryotic promoters: preset and remodeling chromatin structures. Bioessays. 1994 Mar;16(3):165–170. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wen L. P., Koeiman N., Whitlock J. P., Jr Dioxin-inducible, Ah receptor-dependent transcription in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Nov;87(21):8545–8549. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Whitelaw M. L., Gustafsson J. A., Poellinger L. Identification of transactivation and repression functions of the dioxin receptor and its basic helix-loop-helix/PAS partner factor Arnt: inducible versus constitutive modes of regulation. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;14(12):8343–8355. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.12.8343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Whitelaw M., Pongratz I., Wilhelmsson A., Gustafsson J. A., Poellinger L. Ligand-dependent recruitment of the Arnt coregulator determines DNA recognition by the dioxin receptor. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):2504–2514. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Whitlock J. P., Jr Mechanistic aspects of dioxin action. Chem Res Toxicol. 1993 Nov-Dec;6(6):754–763. doi: 10.1021/tx00036a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu L., Whitlock J. P., Jr Mechanism of dioxin action: Ah receptor-mediated increase in promoter accessibility in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 1;89(11):4811–4815. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.11.4811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu L., Whitlock J. P., Jr Mechanism of dioxin action: receptor-enhancer interactions in intact cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jan 11;21(1):119–125. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.1.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES