Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1995 Aug;15(8):4086–4094. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.8.4086

Synthetic signals for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis.

S Sadis 1, C Atienza Jr 1, D Finley 1
PMCID: PMC230647  PMID: 7623804

Abstract

Short-lived proteins are targeted for turnover by sequence elements known as degradation signals. Because of the large size and heterogeneity of these signals, the structural features important for their function are not well defined. In this study, we have isolated three classes of degradation signals by screening short artificial sequences for the ability to destabilize a reporter protein. Class I and class II signals were derived by inserting random nonapeptide sequences after the second residue of beta-galactosidase. Class III signals contained five-residue homopolymers at the same position. Class I beta-galactosidase turnover was inhibited in mutants lacking either the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc2 or the ubiquitin protein ligase Ubr1. Class I random inserts functioned to promote N-terminal proteolytic processing and define a novel pathway for exposure of residues that are destabilizing according to the N-end rule. Efficient degradation of proteins containing class II signals required at least three Ubc enzymes: Ubc6, Ubc7, and either one of the related enzymes Ubc4 and Ubc5. Analysis of 56 amino acid substitutions in the class II signal suggested that it is recognized in the form of an amphipathic alpha helix. Class III signals consisted of short tracts of hydrophobic residues such as Leu and Ile. Degradation of class III proteins involved the Ubc4 and Ubc5 enzymes but not Ubc2, Ubc6, or Ubc7. Clusters of hydrophobic residues appear to be critical for the recognition of both class II and class III signals.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (383.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abovich N., Gritz L., Tung L., Rosbash M. Effect of RP51 gene dosage alterations on ribosome synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Dec;5(12):3429–3435. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.12.3429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alani E., Cao L., Kleckner N. A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics. 1987 Aug;116(4):541–545. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.541.test. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachmair A., Finley D., Varshavsky A. In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science. 1986 Oct 10;234(4773):179–186. doi: 10.1126/science.3018930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bachmair A., Varshavsky A. The degradation signal in a short-lived protein. Cell. 1989 Mar 24;56(6):1019–1032. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90635-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker R. T., Varshavsky A. Inhibition of the N-end rule pathway in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 15;88(4):1090–1094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.4.1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartel B., Wünning I., Varshavsky A. The recognition component of the N-end rule pathway. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3179–3189. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07516.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blond-Elguindi S., Cwirla S. E., Dower W. J., Lipshutz R. J., Sprang S. R., Sambrook J. F., Gething M. J. Affinity panning of a library of peptides displayed on bacteriophages reveals the binding specificity of BiP. Cell. 1993 Nov 19;75(4):717–728. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90492-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonifacino J. S., Cosson P., Klausner R. D. Colocalized transmembrane determinants for ER degradation and subunit assembly explain the intracellular fate of TCR chains. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):503–513. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90447-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang Y. H., Teichert U., Smith J. A. Molecular cloning, sequencing, deletion, and overexpression of a methionine aminopeptidase gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1992 Apr 25;267(12):8007–8011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang Y. H., Teichert U., Smith J. A. Purification and characterization of a methionine aminopeptidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1990 Nov 15;265(32):19892–19897. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chau V., Tobias J. W., Bachmair A., Marriott D., Ecker D. J., Gonda D. K., Varshavsky A. A multiubiquitin chain is confined to specific lysine in a targeted short-lived protein. Science. 1989 Mar 24;243(4898):1576–1583. doi: 10.1126/science.2538923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen P., Johnson P., Sommer T., Jentsch S., Hochstrasser M. Multiple ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes participate in the in vivo degradation of the yeast MAT alpha 2 repressor. Cell. 1993 Jul 30;74(2):357–369. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90426-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway. Cell. 1994 Oct 7;79(1):13–21. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90396-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Deveraux Q., Ustrell V., Pickart C., Rechsteiner M. A 26 S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 11;269(10):7059–7061. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dohmen R. J., Madura K., Bartel B., Varshavsky A. The N-end rule is mediated by the UBC2(RAD6) ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):7351–7355. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Egner R., Thumm M., Straub M., Simeon A., Schüller H. J., Wolf D. H. Tracing intracellular proteolytic pathways. Proteolysis of fatty acid synthase and other cytoplasmic proteins in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1993 Dec 25;268(36):27269–27276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Finley D., Chau V. Ubiquitination. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1991;7:25–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.000325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Finley D., Ozkaynak E., Varshavsky A. The yeast polyubiquitin gene is essential for resistance to high temperatures, starvation, and other stresses. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):1035–1046. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90711-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Flynn G. C., Chappell T. G., Rothman J. E. Peptide binding and release by proteins implicated as catalysts of protein assembly. Science. 1989 Jul 28;245(4916):385–390. doi: 10.1126/science.2756425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Glotzer M., Murray A. W., Kirschner M. W. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature. 1991 Jan 10;349(6305):132–138. doi: 10.1038/349132a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gonda D. K., Bachmair A., Wünning I., Tobias J. W., Lane W. S., Varshavsky A. Universality and structure of the N-end rule. J Biol Chem. 1989 Oct 5;264(28):16700–16712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gragerov A., Zeng L., Zhao X., Burkholder W., Gottesman M. E. Specificity of DnaK-peptide binding. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 21;235(3):848–854. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Guarente L. Yeast promoters and lacZ fusions designed to study expression of cloned genes in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:181–191. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guarente L., Yocum R. R., Gifford P. A GAL10-CYC1 hybrid yeast promoter identifies the GAL4 regulatory region as an upstream site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(23):7410–7414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hershko A., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system for protein degradation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:761–807. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.003553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ho C. Y., Adamson J. G., Hodges R. S., Smith M. Heterodimerization of the yeast MATa1 and MAT alpha 2 proteins is mediated by two leucine zipper-like coiled-coil motifs. EMBO J. 1994 Mar 15;13(6):1403–1413. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06394.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hochstrasser M., Varshavsky A. In vivo degradation of a transcriptional regulator: the yeast alpha 2 repressor. Cell. 1990 May 18;61(4):697–708. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90481-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang S., Elliott R. C., Liu P. S., Koduri R. K., Weickmann J. L., Lee J. H., Blair L. C., Ghosh-Dastidar P., Bradshaw R. A., Bryan K. M. Specificity of cotranslational amino-terminal processing of proteins in yeast. Biochemistry. 1987 Dec 15;26(25):8242–8246. doi: 10.1021/bi00399a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones E. W. Three proteolytic systems in the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1991 May 5;266(13):7963–7966. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaiser C. A., Preuss D., Grisafi P., Botstein D. Many random sequences functionally replace the secretion signal sequence of yeast invertase. Science. 1987 Jan 16;235(4786):312–317. doi: 10.1126/science.3541205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Knapp A. C., Franke W. W. Spontaneous losses of control of cytokeratin gene expression in transformed, non-epithelial human cells occurring at different levels of regulation. Cell. 1989 Oct 6;59(1):67–79. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90870-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kornitzer D., Raboy B., Kulka R. G., Fink G. R. Regulated degradation of the transcription factor Gcn4. EMBO J. 1994 Dec 15;13(24):6021–6030. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06948.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Laforet G. A., Kendall D. A. Functional limits of conformation, hydrophobicity, and steric constraints in prokaryotic signal peptide cleavage regions. Wild type transport by a simple polymeric signal sequence. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jan 15;266(2):1326–1334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lemire B. D., Fankhauser C., Baker A., Schatz G. The mitochondrial targeting function of randomly generated peptide sequences correlates with predicted helical amphiphilicity. J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 5;264(34):20206–20215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lin W. C., Desiderio S. Regulation of V(D)J recombination activator protein RAG-2 by phosphorylation. Science. 1993 May 14;260(5110):953–959. doi: 10.1126/science.8493533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Madura K., Varshavsky A. Degradation of G alpha by the N-end rule pathway. Science. 1994 Sep 2;265(5177):1454–1458. doi: 10.1126/science.8073290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moerschell R. P., Hosokawa Y., Tsunasawa S., Sherman F. The specificities of yeast methionine aminopeptidase and acetylation of amino-terminal methionine in vivo. Processing of altered iso-1-cytochromes c created by oligonucleotide transformation. J Biol Chem. 1990 Nov 15;265(32):19638–19643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pelham H. R. Speculations on the functions of the major heat shock and glucose-regulated proteins. Cell. 1986 Sep 26;46(7):959–961. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90693-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rechsteiner M., Hoffman L., Dubiel W. The multicatalytic and 26 S proteases. J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 25;268(9):6065–6068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Reiss Y., Kaim D., Hershko A. Specificity of binding of NH2-terminal residue of proteins to ubiquitin-protein ligase. Use of amino acid derivatives to characterize specific binding sites. J Biol Chem. 1988 Feb 25;263(6):2693–2698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rogers S., Wells R., Rechsteiner M. Amino acid sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins: the PEST hypothesis. Science. 1986 Oct 17;234(4774):364–368. doi: 10.1126/science.2876518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Salama S. R., Hendricks K. B., Thorner J. G1 cyclin degradation: the PEST motif of yeast Cln2 is necessary, but not sufficient, for rapid protein turnover. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;14(12):7953–7966. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.12.7953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Scheffner M., Huibregtse J. M., Vierstra R. D., Howley P. M. The HPV-16 E6 and E6-AP complex functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase in the ubiquitination of p53. Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):495–505. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90384-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Scheffner M., Nuber U., Huibregtse J. M. Protein ubiquitination involving an E1-E2-E3 enzyme ubiquitin thioester cascade. Nature. 1995 Jan 5;373(6509):81–83. doi: 10.1038/373081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schimke R. T. Control of enzyme levels in mammalian tissues. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1973;37:135–187. doi: 10.1002/9780470122822.ch3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Seufert W., Futcher B., Jentsch S. Role of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in degradation of S- and M-phase cyclins. Nature. 1995 Jan 5;373(6509):78–81. doi: 10.1038/373078a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Seufert W., Jentsch S. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes UBC4 and UBC5 mediate selective degradation of short-lived and abnormal proteins. EMBO J. 1990 Feb;9(2):543–550. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08141.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sherman F., Stewart J. W., Tsunasawa S. Methionine or not methionine at the beginning of a protein. Bioessays. 1985 Jul;3(1):27–31. doi: 10.1002/bies.950030108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Varshavsky A. The N-end rule. Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):725–735. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90285-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yaglom J., Linskens M. H., Sadis S., Rubin D. M., Futcher B., Finley D. p34Cdc28-mediated control of Cln3 cyclin degradation. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;15(2):731–741. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.2.731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES