Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1995 Sep;15(9):4921–4929. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.9.4921

ELF-2, a new member of the Eph ligand family, is segmentally expressed in mouse embryos in the region of the hindbrain and newly forming somites.

A D Bergemann 1, H J Cheng 1, R Brambilla 1, R Klein 1, J G Flanagan 1
PMCID: PMC230738  PMID: 7651410

Abstract

The Eph receptors are the largest known family of receptor tyrosine kinases and are notable for distinctive expression patterns in the nervous system and in early vertebrate development. However, all were identified as orphan receptors, and only recently have there been descriptions of a corresponding family of ligands. We describe here a new member of the Eph ligand family, designated ELF-2 (Eph ligand family 2). The cDNA sequence for mouse ELF-2 indicates that it is a transmembrane ligand. It shows closest homology to the other known transmembrane ligand in the family, ELK-L/LERK-2/Cek5-L, with 57% identity in the extracellular domain. There is also striking homology in the cytoplasmic domain, including complete identity of the last 33 amino acids, suggesting intracellular interactions. On cell surfaces, and in a cell-free system, ELF-2 binds to three closely related Eph family receptors, Elk, Cek10 (apparent ortholog of Sek-4 and HEK2), and Cek5 (apparent ortholog of Nuk/Sek-3), all with dissociation constants of approximately 1 nM. In situ hybridization of mouse embryos shows ELF-2 RNA expression in a segmental pattern in the hindbrain region and the segmenting mesoderm. Comparable patterns have been described for Eph family receptors, including Sek-4 and Nuk/Sek-3, suggesting roles for ELF-2 in patterning these regions of the embryo.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (992.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aruffo A., Stamenkovic I., Melnick M., Underhill C. B., Seed B. CD44 is the principal cell surface receptor for hyaluronate. Cell. 1990 Jun 29;61(7):1303–1313. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90694-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartley T. D., Hunt R. W., Welcher A. A., Boyle W. J., Parker V. P., Lindberg R. A., Lu H. S., Colombero A. M., Elliott R. L., Guthrie B. A. B61 is a ligand for the ECK receptor protein-tyrosine kinase. Nature. 1994 Apr 7;368(6471):558–560. doi: 10.1038/368558a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker N., Seitanidou T., Murphy P., Mattéi M. G., Topilko P., Nieto M. A., Wilkinson D. G., Charnay P., Gilardi-Hebenstreit P. Several receptor tyrosine kinase genes of the Eph family are segmentally expressed in the developing hindbrain. Mech Dev. 1994 Jul;47(1):3–17. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(94)90091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beckmann M. P., Cerretti D. P., Baum P., Vanden Bos T., James L., Farrah T., Kozlosky C., Hollingsworth T., Shilling H., Maraskovsky E. Molecular characterization of a family of ligands for eph-related tyrosine kinase receptors. EMBO J. 1994 Aug 15;13(16):3757–3762. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06685.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosenberg M. W., Pandiella A., Massagué J. The cytoplasmic carboxy-terminal amino acid specifies cleavage of membrane TGF alpha into soluble growth factor. Cell. 1992 Dec 24;71(7):1157–1165. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80064-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cantley L. C., Auger K. R., Carpenter C., Duckworth B., Graziani A., Kapeller R., Soltoff S. Oncogenes and signal transduction. Cell. 1991 Jan 25;64(2):281–302. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90639-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng H. J., Flanagan J. G. Identification and cloning of ELF-1, a developmentally expressed ligand for the Mek4 and Sek receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 1994 Oct 7;79(1):157–168. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90408-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng H. J., Flanagan J. G. Transmembrane kit ligand cleavage does not require a signal in the cytoplasmic domain and occurs at a site dependent on spacing from the membrane. Mol Biol Cell. 1994 Sep;5(9):943–953. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.9.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ciossek T., Millauer B., Ullrich A. Identification of alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding variants of MDK1, a novel receptor tyrosine kinase expressed in the murine nervous system. Oncogene. 1995 Jan 5;10(1):97–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis S., Gale N. W., Aldrich T. H., Maisonpierre P. C., Lhotak V., Pawson T., Goldfarb M., Yancopoulos G. D. Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science. 1994 Nov 4;266(5186):816–819. doi: 10.1126/science.7973638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eisenberg S. P., Evans R. J., Arend W. P., Verderber E., Brewer M. T., Hannum C. H., Thompson R. C. Primary structure and functional expression from complementary DNA of a human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Nature. 1990 Jan 25;343(6256):341–346. doi: 10.1038/343341a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fantl W. J., Johnson D. E., Williams L. T. Signalling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Annu Rev Biochem. 1993;62:453–481. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.002321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Flanagan J. G., Chan D. C., Leder P. Transmembrane form of the kit ligand growth factor is determined by alternative splicing and is missing in the Sld mutant. Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):1025–1035. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90326-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Flanagan J. G., Leder P. The kit ligand: a cell surface molecule altered in steel mutant fibroblasts. Cell. 1990 Oct 5;63(1):185–194. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90299-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fletcher F. A., Renshaw B., Hollingsworth T., Baum P., Lyman S. D., Jenkins N. A., Gilbert D. J., Copeland N. G., Davison B. L. Genomic organization and chromosomal localization of mouse Eplg2, a gene encoding a binding protein for the receptor tyrosine kinase elk. Genomics. 1994 Nov 1;24(1):127–132. doi: 10.1006/geno.1994.1589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ganju P., Shigemoto K., Brennan J., Entwistle A., Reith A. D. The Eck receptor tyrosine kinase is implicated in pattern formation during gastrulation, hindbrain segmentation and limb development. Oncogene. 1994 Jun;9(6):1613–1624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hein J. Unified approach to alignment and phylogenies. Methods Enzymol. 1990;183:626–645. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)83041-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Henkemeyer M., Marengere L. E., McGlade J., Olivier J. P., Conlon R. A., Holmyard D. P., Letwin K., Pawson T. Immunolocalization of the Nuk receptor tyrosine kinase suggests roles in segmental patterning of the brain and axonogenesis. Oncogene. 1994 Apr;9(4):1001–1014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Holzman L. B., Marks R. M., Dixit V. M. A novel immediate-early response gene of endothelium is induced by cytokines and encodes a secreted protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5830–5838. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kozak M. An analysis of 5'-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Oct 26;15(20):8125–8148. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.20.8125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kozlosky C. J., Maraskovsky E., McGrew J. T., VandenBos T., Teepe M., Lyman S. D., Srinivasan S., Fletcher F. A., Gayle R. B., 3rd, Cerretti D. P. Ligands for the receptor tyrosine kinases hek and elk: isolation of cDNAs encoding a family of proteins. Oncogene. 1995 Jan 19;10(2):299–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lai C., Lemke G. An extended family of protein-tyrosine kinase genes differentially expressed in the vertebrate nervous system. Neuron. 1991 May;6(5):691–704. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90167-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lhoták V., Greer P., Letwin K., Pawson T. Characterization of elk, a brain-specific receptor tyrosine kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 May;11(5):2496–2502. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.5.2496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lumsden A., Keynes R. Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature. 1989 Feb 2;337(6206):424–428. doi: 10.1038/337424a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lumsden A., Sprawson N., Graham A. Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development. 1991 Dec;113(4):1281–1291. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.4.1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Maisonpierre P. C., Barrezueta N. X., Yancopoulos G. D. Ehk-1 and Ehk-2: two novel members of the Eph receptor-like tyrosine kinase family with distinctive structures and neuronal expression. Oncogene. 1993 Dec;8(12):3277–3288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Massagué J., Pandiella A. Membrane-anchored growth factors. Annu Rev Biochem. 1993;62:515–541. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.002503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nieto M. A., Gilardi-Hebenstreit P., Charnay P., Wilkinson D. G. A receptor protein tyrosine kinase implicated in the segmental patterning of the hindbrain and mesoderm. Development. 1992 Dec;116(4):1137–1150. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.4.1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pasquale E. B., Deerinck T. J., Singer S. J., Ellisman M. H. Cek5, a membrane receptor-type tyrosine kinase, is in neurons of the embryonic and postnatal avian brain. J Neurosci. 1992 Oct;12(10):3956–3967. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-10-03956.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ruiz J. C., Robertson E. J. The expression of the receptor-protein tyrosine kinase gene, eck, is highly restricted during early mouse development. Mech Dev. 1994 May;46(2):87–100. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(94)90078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sajjadi F. G., Pasquale E. B. Five novel avian Eph-related tyrosine kinases are differentially expressed. Oncogene. 1993 Jul;8(7):1807–1813. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shao H., Lou L., Pandey A., Pasquale E. B., Dixit V. M. cDNA cloning and characterization of a ligand for the Cek5 receptor protein-tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem. 1994 Oct 28;269(43):26606–26609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Soans C., Holash J. A., Pasquale E. B. Characterization of the expression of the Cek8 receptor-type tyrosine kinase during development and in tumor cell lines. Oncogene. 1994 Nov;9(11):3353–3361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tuzi N. L., Gullick W. J. eph, the largest known family of putative growth factor receptors. Br J Cancer. 1994 Mar;69(3):417–421. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilkinson D. G., Nieto M. A. Detection of messenger RNA by in situ hybridization to tissue sections and whole mounts. Methods Enzymol. 1993;225:361–373. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(93)25025-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhou R., Copeland T. D., Kromer L. F., Schulz N. T. Isolation and characterization of Bsk, a growth factor receptor-like tyrosine kinase associated with the limbic system. J Neurosci Res. 1994 Jan;37(1):129–143. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490370117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. van der Geer P., Hunter T., Lindberg R. A. Receptor protein-tyrosine kinases and their signal transduction pathways. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1994;10:251–337. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.10.110194.001343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. von Heijne G. How signal sequences maintain cleavage specificity. J Mol Biol. 1984 Feb 25;173(2):243–251. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90192-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES