Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1995 Nov;15(11):6013–6024. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6013

Role of chromatin and Xenopus laevis heat shock transcription factor in regulation of transcription from the X. laevis hsp70 promoter in vivo.

N Landsberger 1, A P Wolffe 1
PMCID: PMC230853  PMID: 7565754

Abstract

Xenopus laevis oocytes activate transcription from the Xenopus hsp70 promoter within a chromatin template in response to heat shock. Expression of exogenous Xenopus heat shock transcription factor 1 (XHSF1) causes the activation of the wild-type hsp70 promoter within chromatin. XHSF1 activates transcription at normal growth temperatures (18 degrees C), but heat shock (34 degrees C) facilitates transcriptional activation. Titration of chromatin in vivo leads to constitutive transcription from the wild-type hsp70 promoter. The Y box elements within the hsp70 promoter facilitate transcription in the presence or absence of chromatin. The presence of the Y box elements prevents the assembly of canonical nucleosomal arrays over the promoter and facilitates transcription. In a mutant hsp70 promoter lacking Y boxes, exogenous XHSF1 activates transcription from a chromatin template much more efficiently under heat shock conditions. Activation of transcription from the mutant promoter by exogenous XHSF1 correlates with the disappearance of a canonical nucleosomal array over the promoter. Chromatin structure on a mutant hsp70 promoter lacking Y boxes can restrict XHSF1 access; however, on both mutant and wild-type promoters, chromatin assembly can also restrict the function of the basal transcriptional machinery. We suggest that chromatin assembly has a physiological role in establishing a transcriptionally repressed state on the Xenopus hsp70 promoter in vivo.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (726.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams C. C., Workman J. L. Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Mar;15(3):1405–1421. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.3.1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almouzni G., Méchali M., Wolffe A. P. Competition between transcription complex assembly and chromatin assembly on replicating DNA. EMBO J. 1990 Feb;9(2):573–582. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08145.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Almouzni G., Wolffe A. P. Constraints on transcriptional activator function contribute to transcriptional quiescence during early Xenopus embryogenesis. EMBO J. 1995 Apr 18;14(8):1752–1765. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07164.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Almouzni G., Wolffe A. P. Replication-coupled chromatin assembly is required for the repression of basal transcription in vivo. Genes Dev. 1993 Oct;7(10):2033–2047. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.10.2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baxevanis A. D., Arents G., Moudrianakis E. N., Landsman D. A variety of DNA-binding and multimeric proteins contain the histone fold motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Jul 25;23(14):2685–2691. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.14.2685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Becker P. B., Rabindran S. K., Wu C. Heat shock-regulated transcription in vitro from a reconstituted chromatin template. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 May 15;88(10):4109–4113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.10.4109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Becker P. B., Wu C. Cell-free system for assembly of transcriptionally repressed chromatin from Drosophila embryos. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 May;12(5):2241–2249. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.5.2241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bienz M. A CCAAT box confers cell-type-specific regulation on the Xenopus hsp70 gene in oocytes. Cell. 1986 Sep 26;46(7):1037–1042. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90703-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bienz M. Developmental control of the heat shock response in Xenopus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 May;81(10):3138–3142. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.10.3138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bienz M., Gurdon J. B. The heat-shock response in Xenopus oocytes is controlled at the translational level. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):811–819. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90443-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bienz M., Pelham H. R. Heat shock regulatory elements function as an inducible enhancer in the Xenopus hsp70 gene and when linked to a heterologous promoter. Cell. 1986 Jun 6;45(5):753–760. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90789-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bienz M. Xenopus hsp 70 genes are constitutively expressed in injected oocytes. EMBO J. 1984 Nov;3(11):2477–2483. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02159.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cho H., Wolffe A. P. Xenopus laevis B4, an intron-containing oocyte-specific linker histone-encoding gene. Gene. 1994 Jun 10;143(2):233–238. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90102-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clos J., Westwood J. T., Becker P. B., Wilson S., Lambert K., Wu C. Molecular cloning and expression of a hexameric Drosophila heat shock factor subject to negative regulation. Cell. 1990 Nov 30;63(5):1085–1097. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90511-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dingwall C., Allan J. Accumulation of the isolated carboxy-terminal domain of histone H1 in the Xenopus oocyte nucleus. EMBO J. 1984 Sep;3(9):1933–1937. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02072.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dorn A., Bollekens J., Staub A., Benoist C., Mathis D. A multiplicity of CCAAT box-binding proteins. Cell. 1987 Sep 11;50(6):863–872. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90513-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Evans J. P., Kay B. K. Biochemical fractionation of oocytes. Methods Cell Biol. 1991;36:133–148. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60275-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gallo G. J., Schuetz T. J., Kingston R. E. Regulation of heat shock factor in Schizosaccharomyces pombe more closely resembles regulation in mammals than in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jan;11(1):281–288. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.1.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gargiulo G., Razvi F., Ruberti I., Mohr I., Worcel A. Chromatin-specific hypersensitive sites are assembled on a Xenopus histone gene injected into Xenopus oocytes. J Mol Biol. 1985 Feb 5;181(3):333–349. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90223-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gargiulo G., Worcel A. Analysis of the chromatin assembled in germinal vesicles of Xenopus oocytes. J Mol Biol. 1983 Nov 5;170(3):699–722. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80128-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gariglio P., Buss J., Green M. H. Sarkosyl activation of RNA polymerase activity in mitotic mouse cells. FEBS Lett. 1974 Aug 30;44(3):330–333. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(74)81170-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Giardina C., Pérez-Riba M., Lis J. T. Promoter melting and TFIID complexes on Drosophila genes in vivo. Genes Dev. 1992 Nov;6(11):2190–2200. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilmour D. S., Lis J. T. In vivo interactions of RNA polymerase II with genes of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Aug;5(8):2009–2018. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.8.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilmour D. S., Lis J. T. RNA polymerase II interacts with the promoter region of the noninduced hsp70 gene in Drosophila melanogaster cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3984–3989. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Graves B. J., Johnson P. F., McKnight S. L. Homologous recognition of a promoter domain common to the MSV LTR and the HSV tk gene. Cell. 1986 Feb 28;44(4):565–576. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90266-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gross D. S., Adams C. C., Lee S., Stentz B. A critical role for heat shock transcription factor in establishing a nucleosome-free region over the TATA-initiation site of the yeast HSP82 heat shock gene. EMBO J. 1993 Oct;12(10):3931–3945. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06071.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gross D. S., English K. E., Collins K. W., Lee S. W. Genomic footprinting of the yeast HSP82 promoter reveals marked distortion of the DNA helix and constitutive occupancy of heat shock and TATA elements. J Mol Biol. 1990 Dec 5;216(3):611–631. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90387-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hayes J., Tullius T. D., Wolffe A. P. A protein-protein interaction is essential for stable complex formation on a 5 S RNA gene. J Biol Chem. 1989 Apr 15;264(11):6009–6012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Heikkila J. J., Kloc M., Bury J., Schultz G. A., Browder L. W. Acquisition of the heat-shock response and thermotolerance during early development of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1985 Feb;107(2):483–489. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90329-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hensold J. O., Hunt C. R., Calderwood S. K., Housman D. E., Kingston R. E. DNA binding of heat shock factor to the heat shock element is insufficient for transcriptional activation in murine erythroleukemia cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Apr;10(4):1600–1608. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.4.1600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hooft van Huijsduijnen R., Li X. Y., Black D., Matthes H., Benoist C., Mathis D. Co-evolution from yeast to mouse: cDNA cloning of the two NF-Y (CP-1/CBF) subunits. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3119–3127. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07509.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Horrell A., Shuttleworth J., Colman A. Transcript levels and translational control of hsp70 synthesis in Xenopus oocytes. Genes Dev. 1987 Jul;1(5):433–444. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.5.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jakobsen B. K., Pelham H. R. Constitutive binding of yeast heat shock factor to DNA in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Nov;8(11):5040–5042. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.11.5040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jurivich D. A., Sistonen L., Kroes R. A., Morimoto R. I. Effect of sodium salicylate on the human heat shock response. Science. 1992 Mar 6;255(5049):1243–1245. doi: 10.1126/science.1546322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. King M. L., Davis R. Do Xenopus oocytes have a heat shock response? Dev Biol. 1987 Feb;119(2):532–539. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90056-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Landsberger N., Ranjan M., Almouzni G., Stump D., Wolffe A. P. The heat shock response in Xenopus oocytes, embryos, and somatic cells: a regulatory role for chromatin. Dev Biol. 1995 Jul;170(1):62–74. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1995.1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lis J., Wu C. Protein traffic on the heat shock promoter: parking, stalling, and trucking along. Cell. 1993 Jul 16;74(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90286-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McNabb D. S., Xing Y., Guarente L. Cloning of yeast HAP5: a novel subunit of a heterotrimeric complex required for CCAAT binding. Genes Dev. 1995 Jan 1;9(1):47–58. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Milos P. M., Zaret K. S. A ubiquitous factor is required for C/EBP-related proteins to form stable transcription complexes on an albumin promoter segment in vitro. Genes Dev. 1992 Jun;6(6):991–1004. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Morimoto R. I. Cells in stress: transcriptional activation of heat shock genes. Science. 1993 Mar 5;259(5100):1409–1410. doi: 10.1126/science.8451637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. O'Brien T., Lis J. T. RNA polymerase II pauses at the 5' end of the transcriptionally induced Drosophila hsp70 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):5285–5290. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.5285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Olesen J. T., Guarente L. The HAP2 subunit of yeast CCAAT transcriptional activator contains adjacent domains for subunit association and DNA recognition: model for the HAP2/3/4 complex. Genes Dev. 1990 Oct;4(10):1714–1729. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.10.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ovsenek N., Heikkila J. J. DNA sequence-specific binding activity of the heat-shock transcription factor is heat-inducible before the midblastula transition of early Xenopus development. Development. 1990 Oct;110(2):427–433. doi: 10.1242/dev.110.2.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pederson D. S., Fidrych T. Heat shock factor can activate transcription while bound to nucleosomal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):189–199. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Perlmann T., Wrange O. Inhibition of chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes correlates with derepression of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):5259–5265. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.5259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rabindran S. K., Giorgi G., Clos J., Wu C. Molecular cloning and expression of a human heat shock factor, HSF1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):6906–6910. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.6906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rabindran S. K., Haroun R. I., Clos J., Wisniewski J., Wu C. Regulation of heat shock factor trimer formation: role of a conserved leucine zipper. Science. 1993 Jan 8;259(5092):230–234. doi: 10.1126/science.8421783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ranjan M., Tafuri S. R., Wolffe A. P. Masking mRNA from translation in somatic cells. Genes Dev. 1993 Sep;7(9):1725–1736. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.9.1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rougvie A. E., Lis J. T. The RNA polymerase II molecule at the 5' end of the uninduced hsp70 gene of D. melanogaster is transcriptionally engaged. Cell. 1988 Sep 9;54(6):795–804. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)91087-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ryoji M., Worcel A. Chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes: in vivo studies. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):21–32. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90297-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sarge K. D., Murphy S. P., Morimoto R. I. Activation of heat shock gene transcription by heat shock factor 1 involves oligomerization, acquisition of DNA-binding activity, and nuclear localization and can occur in the absence of stress. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Mar;13(3):1392–1407. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.3.1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schuetz T. J., Gallo G. J., Sheldon L., Tempst P., Kingston R. E. Isolation of a cDNA for HSF2: evidence for two heat shock factor genes in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):6911–6915. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.6911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shimamura A., Sapp M., Rodriguez-Campos A., Worcel A. Histone H1 represses transcription from minichromosomes assembled in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;9(12):5573–5584. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.12.5573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Shimamura A., Tremethick D., Worcel A. Characterization of the repressed 5S DNA minichromosomes assembled in vitro with a high-speed supernatant of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;8(10):4257–4269. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.10.4257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sinha S., Maity S. N., Lu J., de Crombrugghe B. Recombinant rat CBF-C, the third subunit of CBF/NFY, allows formation of a protein-DNA complex with CBF-A and CBF-B and with yeast HAP2 and HAP3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Feb 28;92(5):1624–1628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sorger P. K., Nelson H. C. Trimerization of a yeast transcriptional activator via a coiled-coil motif. Cell. 1989 Dec 1;59(5):807–813. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90604-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sorger P. K., Pelham H. R. Yeast heat shock factor is an essential DNA-binding protein that exhibits temperature-dependent phosphorylation. Cell. 1988 Sep 9;54(6):855–864. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)91219-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sorger P. K. Yeast heat shock factor contains separable transient and sustained response transcriptional activators. Cell. 1990 Aug 24;62(4):793–805. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90123-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Stump D. G., Landsberger N., Wolffe A. P. The cDNA encoding Xenopus laevis heat-shock factor 1 (XHSF1): nucleotide and deduced amino-acid sequences, and properties of the encoded protein. Gene. 1995 Jul 28;160(2):207–211. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00176-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tafuri S. R., Wolffe A. P. Selective recruitment of masked maternal mRNA from messenger ribonucleoprotein particles containing FRGY2 (mRNP4). J Biol Chem. 1993 Nov 15;268(32):24255–24261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Taylor I. C., Workman J. L., Schuetz T. J., Kingston R. E. Facilitated binding of GAL4 and heat shock factor to nucleosomal templates: differential function of DNA-binding domains. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1285–1298. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Toyoda T., Wolffe A. P. In vitro transcription by RNA polymerase II in extracts of Xenopus oocytes, eggs, and somatic cells. Anal Biochem. 1992 Jun;203(2):340–347. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90322-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tsukiyama T., Becker P. B., Wu C. ATP-dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat-shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature. 1994 Feb 10;367(6463):525–532. doi: 10.1038/367525a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Ura K., Hayes J. J., Wolffe A. P. A positive role for nucleosome mobility in the transcriptional activity of chromatin templates: restriction by linker histones. EMBO J. 1995 Aug 1;14(15):3752–3765. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00045.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Varga-Weisz P. D., Blank T. A., Becker P. B. Energy-dependent chromatin accessibility and nucleosome mobility in a cell-free system. EMBO J. 1995 May 15;14(10):2209–2216. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07215.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wall G., Varga-Weisz P. D., Sandaltzopoulos R., Becker P. B. Chromatin remodeling by GAGA factor and heat shock factor at the hypersensitive Drosophila hsp26 promoter in vitro. EMBO J. 1995 Apr 18;14(8):1727–1736. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07162.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wolffe A. P., Perlman A. J., Tata J. R. Transient paralysis by heat shock of hormonal regulation of gene expression. EMBO J. 1984 Dec 1;3(12):2763–2770. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02207.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wolffe A. P. Structural and functional properties of the evolutionarily ancient Y-box family of nucleic acid binding proteins. Bioessays. 1994 Apr;16(4):245–251. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wolffe A. P., Tafuri S., Ranjan M., Familari M. The Y-box factors: a family of nucleic acid binding proteins conserved from Escherichia coli to man. New Biol. 1992 Apr;4(4):290–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wright K. L., Vilen B. J., Itoh-Lindstrom Y., Moore T. L., Li G., Criscitiello M., Cogswell P., Clarke J. B., Ting J. P. CCAAT box binding protein NF-Y facilitates in vivo recruitment of upstream DNA binding transcription factors. EMBO J. 1994 Sep 1;13(17):4042–4053. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06721.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Young D., Carroll D. Regular arrangement of nucleosomes on 5S rRNA genes in Xenopus laevis. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Apr;3(4):720–730. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.4.720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES