Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1995 Nov;15(11):6398–6405. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6398

Human pro-tumor necrosis factor: molecular determinants of membrane translocation, sorting, and maturation.

T Utsumi 1, K Akimaru 1, Z Kawabata 1, A Levitan 1, T Tokunaga 1, P Tang 1, A Ide 1, M C Hung 1, J Klostergaard 1
PMCID: PMC230891  PMID: 7565792

Abstract

Human pro-tumor necrosis factor (pro-TNF) is a type II transmembrane protein with a highly conserved 76-residue leader sequence. We have analyzed the behavior, both in a microsomal translocational system and by transfection, of a series of mutants with deletions from the cytoplasmic, transmembrane, and linking domains. Cytoplasmic deletions included the Arg doublet at -49 and -48 and/or the Lys doublet at -58 and -57; additional mutants included deletion of residues -73 to -55 and -73 to -55, -49, and -48. The transmembrane and linking domain mutants included deletions in the -42 to -35 region, combined with the deletion of residues -32 to -1. Two hybrid mutants combined the cytoplasmic deletions with the deletion of residues -32 to -1. All of the cytoplasmic deletion mutants were properly translocated, as were the transmembrane deletion mutants with deletions up to residues -36, -35, -32 to -1, although the last one exhibited reduced efficiency; further incremental deletions, including deletions of residues -38 to -35 and -32 to -1, completely blocked translocation. Both hybrid mutants were effectively translocated; furthermore, transfection analysis revealed competent expression and maturation of both the cytoplasmic and hybrid mutants. Thus, proper expression and maturation of human pro-TNF can be accomplished with as few as approximately 12 of the 26 residues of the native transmembrane domain and with a net negative charge in the cytoplasmic domain flanking the transmembrane region.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (472.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams G. A., Rose J. K. Structural requirements of a membrane-spanning domain for protein anchoring and cell surface transport. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):1007–1015. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80081-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beltzer J. P., Fiedler K., Fuhrer C., Geffen I., Handschin C., Wessels H. P., Spiess M. Charged residues are major determinants of the transmembrane orientation of a signal-anchor sequence. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jan 15;266(2):973–978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blobel G. Intracellular protein topogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Mar;77(3):1496–1500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.3.1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caput D., Beutler B., Hartog K., Thayer R., Brown-Shimer S., Cerami A. Identification of a common nucleotide sequence in the 3'-untranslated region of mRNA molecules specifying inflammatory mediators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(6):1670–1674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.6.1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis N. G., Model P. An artificial anchor domain: hydrophobicity suffices to stop transfer. Cell. 1985 Jun;41(2):607–614. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Garoff H. Using recombinant DNA techniques to study protein targeting in the eucaryotic cell. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:403–445. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.002155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gearing A. J., Beckett P., Christodoulou M., Churchill M., Clements J., Davidson A. H., Drummond A. H., Galloway W. A., Gilbert R., Gordon J. L. Processing of tumour necrosis factor-alpha precursor by metalloproteinases. Nature. 1994 Aug 18;370(6490):555–557. doi: 10.1038/370555a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hartmann E., Rapoport T. A., Lodish H. F. Predicting the orientation of eukaryotic membrane-spanning proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(15):5786–5790. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.15.5786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hikita C., Mizushima S. Effects of total hydrophobicity and length of the hydrophobic domain of a signal peptide on in vitro translocation efficiency. J Biol Chem. 1992 Mar 5;267(7):4882–4888. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hikita C., Mizushima S. The requirement of a positive charge at the amino terminus can be compensated for by a longer central hydrophobic stretch in the functioning of signal peptides. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jun 15;267(17):12375–12379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kriegler M., Perez C., DeFay K., Albert I., Lu S. D. A novel form of TNF/cachectin is a cell surface cytotoxic transmembrane protein: ramifications for the complex physiology of TNF. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):45–53. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90486-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kyte J., Doolittle R. F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982 May 5;157(1):105–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McGeehan G. M., Becherer J. D., Bast R. C., Jr, Boyer C. M., Champion B., Connolly K. M., Conway J. G., Furdon P., Karp S., Kidao S. Regulation of tumour necrosis factor-alpha processing by a metalloproteinase inhibitor. Nature. 1994 Aug 18;370(6490):558–561. doi: 10.1038/370558a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mohler K. M., Sleath P. R., Fitzner J. N., Cerretti D. P., Alderson M., Kerwar S. S., Torrance D. S., Otten-Evans C., Greenstreet T., Weerawarna K. Protection against a lethal dose of endotoxin by an inhibitor of tumour necrosis factor processing. Nature. 1994 Jul 21;370(6486):218–220. doi: 10.1038/370218a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Müller R., Marmenout A., Fiers W. Synthesis and maturation of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor in eukaryotic systems. FEBS Lett. 1986 Mar 3;197(1-2):99–104. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80306-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nelson D. R., Strobel H. W. On the membrane topology of vertebrate cytochrome P-450 proteins. J Biol Chem. 1988 May 5;263(13):6038–6050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Parks G. D., Lamb R. A. Role of NH2-terminal positively charged residues in establishing membrane protein topology. J Biol Chem. 1993 Sep 5;268(25):19101–19109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Parks G. D., Lamb R. A. Topology of eukaryotic type II membrane proteins: importance of N-terminal positively charged residues flanking the hydrophobic domain. Cell. 1991 Feb 22;64(4):777–787. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90507-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Paul C., Rosenbusch J. P. Folding patterns of porin and bacteriorhodopsin. EMBO J. 1985 Jun;4(6):1593–1597. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03822.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rapoport T. A. Transport of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Science. 1992 Nov 6;258(5084):931–936. doi: 10.1126/science.1332192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sabatini D. D., Kreibich G., Morimoto T., Adesnik M. Mechanisms for the incorporation of proteins in membranes and organelles. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jan;92(1):1–22. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sakaguchi M., Tomiyoshi R., Kuroiwa T., Mihara K., Omura T. Functions of signal and signal-anchor sequences are determined by the balance between the hydrophobic segment and the N-terminal charge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):16–19. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sasaki S., Matsuyama S., Mizushima S. In vitro kinetic analysis of the role of the positive charge at the amino-terminal region of signal peptides in translocation of secretory protein across the cytoplasmic membrane in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1990 Mar 15;265(8):4358–4363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Spiess M., Handschin C. Deletion analysis of the internal signal-anchor domain of the human asialoglycoprotein receptor H1. EMBO J. 1987 Sep;6(9):2683–2691. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02560.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Utsumi T., Levitan A., Hung M. C., Klostergaard J. Effects of truncation of human pro-tumor necrosis factor transmembrane domain on cellular targeting. J Biol Chem. 1993 May 5;268(13):9511–9516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Verner K., Schatz G. Protein translocation across membranes. Science. 1988 Sep 9;241(4871):1307–1313. doi: 10.1126/science.2842866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wickner W. T., Lodish H. F. Multiple mechanisms of protein insertion into and across membranes. Science. 1985 Oct 25;230(4724):400–407. doi: 10.1126/science.4048938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. von Heijne G., Gavel Y. Topogenic signals in integral membrane proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1988 Jul 1;174(4):671–678. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. von Heijne G. Mitochondrial targeting sequences may form amphiphilic helices. EMBO J. 1986 Jun;5(6):1335–1342. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04364.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. von Heijne G. Signal sequences. The limits of variation. J Mol Biol. 1985 Jul 5;184(1):99–105. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90046-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES