Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1995 Dec;15(12):7059–7066. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.12.7059

Mechanism of differential utilization of the his3 TR and TC TATA elements.

V Iyer 1, K Struhl 1
PMCID: PMC230961  PMID: 8524273

Abstract

The yeast his3 promoter region contains two TATA elements, TC and TR, that are differentially utilized in constitutive his3 transcription and Gcn4-activated his3 transcription. TR contains the canonical TATAAA sequence, whereas TC is an extended region that lacks a conventional TATA sequence and does not support transcription in vitro. Surprisingly, differential his3 TATA-element utilization does not depend on specific properties of activator proteins but, rather, is determined by the overall level of his3 transcription. At low levels of transcription, the upstream TC is preferentially utilized, even though it is inherently a much weaker TATA element than TR. The TATA elements are utilized equally at intermediate levels, whereas TR is strongly preferred at high levels of transcription. This characteristic behavior can be recreated by replacing TC with moderately functional derivatives of a conventional TATA element, suggesting that TC is a collection of weak TATA elements. Analysis of promoters containing two biochemically defined TATA elements indicates that differential utilization occurs when the upstream TATA element is weaker than the downstream element. In other situations, the upstream TATA element is preferentially utilized in a manner that is independent of the overall level of transcription. Thus, in promoters containing multiple TATA elements, relative utilization not only depends on the quality and arrangement of the TATA elements but can vary with the overall level of transcriptional stimulation. We suggest that differential TATA utilization results from the combination of an intrinsic preference for the upstream element and functional saturation of weak TATA elements at low levels of transcriptional stimulation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (381.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arndt K. M., Ricupero-Hovasse S., Winston F. TBP mutants defective in activated transcription in vivo. EMBO J. 1995 Apr 3;14(7):1490–1497. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07135.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Auble D. T., Hansen K. E., Mueller C. G., Lane W. S., Thorner J., Hahn S. Mot1, a global repressor of RNA polymerase II transcription, inhibits TBP binding to DNA by an ATP-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 1994 Aug 15;8(16):1920–1934. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.16.1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchman A. R., Kornberg R. D. A yeast ARS-binding protein activates transcription synergistically in combination with other weak activating factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Mar;10(3):887–897. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.3.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buratowski S., Hahn S., Guarente L., Sharp P. A. Five intermediate complexes in transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1989 Feb 24;56(4):549–561. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90578-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carey M., Kakidani H., Leatherwood J., Mostashari F., Ptashne M. An amino-terminal fragment of GAL4 binds DNA as a dimer. J Mol Biol. 1989 Oct 5;209(3):423–432. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chasman D. I., Lue N. F., Buchman A. R., LaPointe J. W., Lorch Y., Kornberg R. D. A yeast protein that influences the chromatin structure of UASG and functions as a powerful auxiliary gene activator. Genes Dev. 1990 Apr;4(4):503–514. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.4.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chatterjee S., Struhl K. Connecting a promoter-bound protein to TBP bypasses the need for a transcriptional activation domain. Nature. 1995 Apr 27;374(6525):820–822. doi: 10.1038/374820a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen W., Struhl K. Saturation mutagenesis of a yeast his3 "TATA element": genetic evidence for a specific TATA-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(8):2691–2695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Collart M. A., Struhl K. NOT1(CDC39), NOT2(CDC36), NOT3, and NOT4 encode a global-negative regulator of transcription that differentially affects TATA-element utilization. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 1;8(5):525–537. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.5.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cormack B. P., Struhl K. The TATA-binding protein is required for transcription by all three nuclear RNA polymerases in yeast cells. Cell. 1992 May 15;69(4):685–696. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90232-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisenmann D. M., Dollard C., Winston F. SPT15, the gene encoding the yeast TATA binding factor TFIID, is required for normal transcription initiation in vivo. Cell. 1989 Sep 22;58(6):1183–1191. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90516-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Friden P., Schimmel P. LEU3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a factor for control of RNA levels of a group of leucine-specific genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Aug;7(8):2708–2717. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.8.2708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fürst P., Hu S., Hackett R., Hamer D. Copper activates metallothionein gene transcription by altering the conformation of a specific DNA binding protein. Cell. 1988 Nov 18;55(4):705–717. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90229-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hahn S., Buratowski S., Sharp P. A., Guarente L. Identification of a yeast protein homologous in function to the mammalian general transcription factor, TFIIA. EMBO J. 1989 Nov;8(11):3379–3382. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08501.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harbury P. A., Struhl K. Functional distinctions between yeast TATA elements. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;9(12):5298–5304. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.12.5298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hill D. E., Hope I. A., Macke J. P., Struhl K. Saturation mutagenesis of the yeast his3 regulatory site: requirements for transcriptional induction and for binding by GCN4 activator protein. Science. 1986 Oct 24;234(4775):451–457. doi: 10.1126/science.3532321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hirschman J. E., Durbin K. J., Winston F. Genetic evidence for promoter competition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Nov;8(11):4608–4615. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.11.4608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hope I. A., Mahadevan S., Struhl K. Structural and functional characterization of the short acidic transcriptional activation region of yeast GCN4 protein. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):635–640. doi: 10.1038/333635a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hope I. A., Struhl K. Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of yeast. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):885–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90070-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Iyer V., Struhl K. Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. EMBO J. 1995 Jun 1;14(11):2570–2579. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07255.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Klages N., Strubin M. Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation by recruitment of TBP in vivo. Nature. 1995 Apr 27;374(6525):822–823. doi: 10.1038/374822a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Klein C., Struhl K. Increased recruitment of TATA-binding protein to the promoter by transcriptional activation domains in vivo. Science. 1994 Oct 14;266(5183):280–282. doi: 10.1126/science.7939664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Klein C., Struhl K. Protein kinase A mediates growth-regulated expression of yeast ribosomal protein genes by modulating RAP1 transcriptional activity. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Mar;14(3):1920–1928. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee D. K., DeJong J., Hashimoto S., Horikoshi M., Roeder R. G. TFIIA induces conformational changes in TFIID via interactions with the basic repeat. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;12(11):5189–5196. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.11.5189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee M., Struhl K. Mutations on the DNA-binding surface of TATA-binding protein can specifically impair the response to acidic activators in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5461–5469. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li W. Z., Sherman F. Two types of TATA elements for the CYC1 gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):666–676. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mahadevan S., Struhl K. Tc, an unusual promoter element required for constitutive transcription of the yeast HIS3 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;10(9):4447–4455. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.9.4447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McNabb D. S., Xing Y., Guarente L. Cloning of yeast HAP5: a novel subunit of a heterotrimeric complex required for CCAAT binding. Genes Dev. 1995 Jan 1;9(1):47–58. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nagawa F., Fink G. R. The relationship between the "TATA" sequence and transcription initiation sites at the HIS4 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8557–8561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pellman D., McLaughlin M. E., Fink G. R. TATA-dependent and TATA-independent transcription at the HIS4 gene of yeast. Nature. 1990 Nov 1;348(6296):82–85. doi: 10.1038/348082a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pfeifer K., Kim K. S., Kogan S., Guarente L. Functional dissection and sequence of yeast HAP1 activator. Cell. 1989 Jan 27;56(2):291–301. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90903-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ponticelli A. S., Struhl K. Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 transcription in vitro: biochemical support for multiple mechanisms of transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;10(6):2832–2839. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.6.2832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pu W. T., Struhl K. Highly conserved residues in the bZIP domain of yeast GCN4 are not essential for DNA binding. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):4918–4926. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.4918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Roy A., Exinger F., Losson R. cis- and trans-acting regulatory elements of the yeast URA3 promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;10(10):5257–5270. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.10.5257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Siddiqui A. H., Brandriss M. C. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae PUT3 activator protein associates with proline-specific upstream activation sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):4706–4712. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.4706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sorger P. K., Lewis M. J., Pelham H. R. Heat shock factor is regulated differently in yeast and HeLa cells. Nature. 1987 Sep 3;329(6134):81–84. doi: 10.1038/329081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stargell L. A., Struhl K. The TBP-TFIIA interaction in the response to acidic activators in vivo. Science. 1995 Jul 7;269(5220):75–78. doi: 10.1126/science.7604282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Struhl K. Constitutive and inducible Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoters: evidence for two distinct molecular mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3847–3853. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Struhl K. Genetic properties and chromatin structure of the yeast gal regulatory element: an enhancer-like sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):7865–7869. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.7865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Struhl K. Yeast transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:651–674. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.003251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tice-Baldwin K., Fink G. R., Arndt K. T. BAS1 has a Myb motif and activates HIS4 transcription only in combination with BAS2. Science. 1989 Nov 17;246(4932):931–935. doi: 10.1126/science.2683089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tzamarias D., Struhl K. Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex. Nature. 1994 Jun 30;369(6483):758–761. doi: 10.1038/369758a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wobbe C. R., Struhl K. Yeast and human TATA-binding proteins have nearly identical DNA sequence requirements for transcription in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;10(8):3859–3867. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.8.3859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES