Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1996 Apr;16(4):1746–1758. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.4.1746

Role of negative regulation in promoter specificity of the homologous transcriptional activators Ace2p and Swi5p.

P R Dohrmann 1, W P Voth 1, D J Stillman 1
PMCID: PMC231161  PMID: 8657150

Abstract

The Ace2p and Swi5p zinc finger proteins have nearly identical DNA-binding domains, yet in vivo they activate transcription of different genes, CTS1 and HO. We now demonstrate that Ace2p and Swi5p recognize sites in the CTS1 and HO promoters with the same affinities, raising the question of how promoter specificity is achieved by these proteins with similar DNA-binding domains. It has been previously shown that Swi5p binds to the HO promoter cooperatively with the Pho2p (Base2p/Grf10p) homeodomain protein, and we now show that Ace2p does not interact with Pho2p. Analysis of CTS1 promoter fragments inserted into a heterologous promoter identify a sequence 90 bp away from the Ace2p binding sites which is required to prevent activation by Swi5p through these binding sites. These results suggest that a regulatory protein bound to the CTS1 promoter is needed to prevent Swi5p from activating CT1S expression. A genetic screen was conducted to identify suppressor mutations which allow CTS1 expression in the absence of the Ace2p activator. The nce3 mutation suppresses the ace2 defect in CTS1 expression only if the strain contains a functional SWI5 gene, suggesting that NCE3 normally functions to prevent Swi5p from activating CTS1. The role of negative regulators such as NCE3, as well as the previously described SIN5 gene, in determining the promoter specificity of homologous activators is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (477.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alani E., Cao L., Kleckner N. A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics. 1987 Aug;116(4):541–545. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.541.test. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brazas R. M., Stillman D. J. Identification and purification of a protein that binds DNA cooperatively with the yeast SWI5 protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;13(9):5524–5537. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.9.5524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brazas R. M., Stillman D. J. The Swi5 zinc-finger and Grf10 homeodomain proteins bind DNA cooperatively at the yeast HO promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 1;90(23):11237–11241. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.23.11237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Breeden L., Nasmyth K. Cell cycle control of the yeast HO gene: cis- and trans-acting regulators. Cell. 1987 Feb 13;48(3):389–397. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90190-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Breeden L., Nasmyth K. Regulation of the yeast HO gene. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1985;50:643–650. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1985.050.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Butler G., Thiele D. J. ACE2, an activator of yeast metallothionein expression which is homologous to SWI5. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jan;11(1):476–485. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.1.476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chong J. A., Tapia-Ramírez J., Kim S., Toledo-Aral J. J., Zheng Y., Boutros M. C., Altshuller Y. M., Frohman M. A., Kraner S. D., Mandel G. REST: a mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons. Cell. 1995 Mar 24;80(6):949–957. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90298-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chung C. T., Miller R. H. A rapid and convenient method for the preparation and storage of competent bacterial cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Apr 25;16(8):3580–3580. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.8.3580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cleary M. A., Stern S., Tanaka M., Herr W. Differential positive control by Oct-1 and Oct-2: activation of a transcriptionally silent motif through Oct-1 and VP16 corecruitment. Genes Dev. 1993 Jan;7(1):72–83. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.1.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cowell I. G. Repression versus activation in the control of gene transcription. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Jan;19(1):38–42. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90172-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dohrmann P. R., Butler G., Tamai K., Dorland S., Greene J. R., Thiele D. J., Stillman D. J. Parallel pathways of gene regulation: homologous regulators SWI5 and ACE2 differentially control transcription of HO and chitinase. Genes Dev. 1992 Jan;6(1):93–104. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.1.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goutte C., Johnson A. D. Yeast a1 and alpha 2 homeodomain proteins form a DNA-binding activity with properties distinct from those of either protein. J Mol Biol. 1993 Oct 5;233(3):359–371. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guarente L., Hoar E. Upstream activation sites of the CYC1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are active when inverted but not when placed downstream of the "TATA box". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):7860–7864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.7860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guarente L., Lalonde B., Gifford P., Alani E. Distinctly regulated tandem upstream activation sites mediate catabolite repression of the CYC1 gene of S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1984 Feb;36(2):503–511. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90243-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hermes J. D., Parekh S. M., Blacklow S. C., Köster H., Knowles J. R. A reliable method for random mutagenesis: the generation of mutant libraries using spiked oligodeoxyribonucleotide primers. Gene. 1989 Dec 7;84(1):143–151. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90148-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Herschbach B. M., Johnson A. D. Transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1993;9:479–509. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.002403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiang Y. W., Stillman D. J. Involvement of the SIN4 global transcriptional regulator in the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;12(10):4503–4514. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang Y. W., Stillman D. J. Regulation of HIS4 expression by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN4 transcriptional regulator. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):103–114. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Keleher C. A., Passmore S., Johnson A. D. Yeast repressor alpha 2 binds to its operator cooperatively with yeast protein Mcm1. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):5228–5230. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.5228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Keleher C. A., Redd M. J., Schultz J., Carlson M., Johnson A. D. Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):709–719. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuranda M. J., Robbins P. W. Chitinase is required for cell separation during growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1991 Oct 15;266(29):19758–19767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Laughon A. DNA binding specificity of homeodomains. Biochemistry. 1991 Dec 3;30(48):11357–11367. doi: 10.1021/bi00112a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lawrence C. W. Classical mutagenesis techniques. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:273–281. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94021-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Leuther K. K., Salmeron J. M., Johnston S. A. Genetic evidence that an activation domain of GAL4 does not require acidity and may form a beta sheet. Cell. 1993 Feb 26;72(4):575–585. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90076-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Levine M., Manley J. L. Transcriptional repression of eukaryotic promoters. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):405–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90024-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miles J., Formosa T. Evidence that POB1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein that binds to DNA polymerase alpha, acts in DNA metabolism in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Dec;12(12):5724–5735. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.12.5724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Myers A. M., Tzagoloff A., Kinney D. M., Lusty C. J. Yeast shuttle and integrative vectors with multiple cloning sites suitable for construction of lacZ fusions. Gene. 1986;45(3):299–310. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nasmyth K., Adolf G., Lydall D., Seddon A. The identification of a second cell cycle control on the HO promoter in yeast: cell cycle regulation of SW15 nuclear entry. Cell. 1990 Aug 24;62(4):631–647. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90110-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pavletich N. P., Pabo C. O. Zinc finger-DNA recognition: crystal structure of a Zif268-DNA complex at 2.1 A. Science. 1991 May 10;252(5007):809–817. doi: 10.1126/science.2028256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Renkawitz R. Transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Genet. 1990 Jun;6(6):192–197. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90176-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rothstein R. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:281–301. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sherman F. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:3–21. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94004-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sikorski R. S., Boeke J. D. In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:302–318. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stillman D. J., Dorland S., Yu Y. Epistasis analysis of suppressor mutations that allow HO expression in the absence of the yeast SW15 transcriptional activator. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):781–788. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tebb G., Moll T., Dowzer C., Nasmyth K. SWI5 instability may be necessary but is not sufficient for asymmetric HO expression in yeast. Genes Dev. 1993 Mar;7(3):517–528. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.3.517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Thomas B. J., Rothstein R. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell. 1989 Feb 24;56(4):619–630. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90584-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Thomas J. H. Thinking about genetic redundancy. Trends Genet. 1993 Nov;9(11):395–399. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90140-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang H., Clark I., Nicholson P. R., Herskowitz I., Stillman D. J. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN3 gene, a negative regulator of HO, contains four paired amphipathic helix motifs. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5927–5936. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang H., Stillman D. J. Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Mar;13(3):1805–1814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.3.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Weintraub H., Genetta T., Kadesch T. Tissue-specific gene activation by MyoD: determination of specificity by cis-acting repression elements. Genes Dev. 1994 Sep 15;8(18):2203–2211. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.18.2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wright W. E. Muscle basic helix-loop-helix proteins and the regulation of myogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1992 Apr;2(2):243–248. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80280-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES