Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1996 May;16(5):2144–2150. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.5.2144

The aromatic hydrocarbon receptor modulates the Hepa 1c1c7 cell cycle and differentiated state independently of dioxin.

Q Ma 1, J P Whitlock Jr 1
PMCID: PMC231202  PMID: 8628281

Abstract

The aromatic hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) has been defined and characterized according to its ability to mediate biological responses to exogenous ligands, such as the synthetic environmental contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). The natural ligand(s) for AhR is unknown, and we know relatively little about AhR function in the absence of TCDD. Here, we have exploited the availability of AhR-defective (AhR-D) mouse hepatoma (Hepa 1c1c7) cells to analyze AhR's effects under conditions in which TCDD is not present. Our results reveal that AhR-D cells exhibit a different morphology, decreased albumin synthesis, and a prolonged doubling time compared with wild-type cells. Introduction of AhR cDNA into AhR-D cells by stable transfection alters these characteristics such that the cells resemble wild-type cells. Conversely, introduction of antisense AhR cDNA into wild-type cells changes their phenotype such that they resemble AhR-D cells. Fluorescence microscopy reveals that AhR-D cells do not exhibit an increased rate of death. Flow cytometric and biochemical analyses imply that the slowed growth rate of AhR-D cells reflects prolongation of G1. Our findings reveal a potential link between AhR and the G1 phase of the Hepa 1c1c7 cell cycle. These effects of AhR occur in the absence of TCDD. We speculate that they represent responses to an endogenous AhR ligand in Hepa 1c1c7 cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (913.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bjeldanes L. F., Kim J. Y., Grose K. R., Bartholomew J. C., Bradfield C. A. Aromatic hydrocarbon responsiveness-receptor agonists generated from indole-3-carbinol in vitro and in vivo: comparisons with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9543–9547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burbach K. M., Poland A., Bradfield C. A. Cloning of the Ah-receptor cDNA reveals a distinctive ligand-activated transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):8185–8189. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Conney A. H. Induction of microsomal enzymes by foreign chemicals and carcinogenesis by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: G. H. A. Clowes Memorial Lecture. Cancer Res. 1982 Dec;42(12):4875–4917. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Czuczwa J. M., McVeety B. D., Hites R. A. Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans in Sediments from Siskiwit Lake, Isle Royale. Science. 1984 Nov 2;226(4674):568–569. doi: 10.1126/science.226.4674.568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darlington G. J., Bernhard H. P., Miller R. A., Ruddle F. H. Expression of liver phenotypes in cultured mouse hepatoma cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980 Apr;64(4):809–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Durrin L. K., Whitlock J. P., Jr 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-inducible aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated change in CYP1A1 chromatin structure occurs independently of transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;9(12):5733–5737. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.12.5733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ema M., Sogawa K., Watanabe N., Chujoh Y., Matsushita N., Gotoh O., Funae Y., Fujii-Kuriyama Y. cDNA cloning and structure of mouse putative Ah receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992 Apr 15;184(1):246–253. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91185-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fernandez-Salguero P., Pineau T., Hilbert D. M., McPhail T., Lee S. S., Kimura S., Nebert D. W., Rudikoff S., Ward J. M., Gonzalez F. J. Immune system impairment and hepatic fibrosis in mice lacking the dioxin-binding Ah receptor. Science. 1995 May 5;268(5211):722–726. doi: 10.1126/science.7732381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fisher J. M., Wu L., Denison M. S., Whitlock J. P., Jr Organization and function of a dioxin-responsive enhancer. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jun 15;265(17):9676–9681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fujii-Kuriyama Y., Imataka H., Sogawa K., Yasumoto K., Kikuchi Y. Regulation of CYP1A1 expression. FASEB J. 1992 Jan 6;6(2):706–710. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.6.2.1537460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gillner M., Bergman J., Cambillau C., Fernström B., Gustafsson J. A. Interactions of indoles with specific binding sites for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in rat liver. Mol Pharmacol. 1985 Oct;28(4):357–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gillner M., Bergman J., Cambillau C., Gustafsson J. A. Interactions of rutaecarpine alkaloids with specific binding sites for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in rat liver. Carcinogenesis. 1989 Apr;10(4):651–654. doi: 10.1093/carcin/10.4.651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Göttlicher M., Cikryt P., Wiebel F. J. Inhibition of growth by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in 5L rat hepatoma cells is associated with the presence of Ah receptor. Carcinogenesis. 1990 Dec;11(12):2205–2210. doi: 10.1093/carcin/11.12.2205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hankinson O., Andersen R. D., Birren B. W., Sander F., Negishi M., Nebert D. W. Mutations affecting the regulation of transcription of the cytochrome P1-450 gene in the mouse Hepa-1 cell line. J Biol Chem. 1985 Feb 10;260(3):1790–1795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hankinson O. Dominant and recessive aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase-deficient mutants of mouse hepatoma line, Hepa-1, and assignment of recessive mutants to three complementation groups. Somatic Cell Genet. 1983 Jul;9(4):497–514. doi: 10.1007/BF01543050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hankinson O. Single-step selection of clones of a mouse hepatoma line deficient in aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):373–376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hankinson O. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1995;35:307–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.35.040195.001515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffman E. C., Reyes H., Chu F. F., Sander F., Conley L. H., Brooks B. A., Hankinson O. Cloning of a factor required for activity of the Ah (dioxin) receptor. Science. 1991 May 17;252(5008):954–958. doi: 10.1126/science.1852076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huff J., Lucier G., Tritscher A. Carcinogenicity of TCDD: experimental, mechanistic, and epidemiologic evidence. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1994;34:343–372. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.34.040194.002015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones P. B., Durrin L. K., Galeazzi D. R., Whitlock J. P., Jr Control of cytochrome P1-450 gene expression: analysis of a dioxin-responsive enhancer system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May;83(9):2802–2806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ko H. P., Okino S. T., Ma Q., Whitlock J. P., Jr Dioxin-induced CYP1A1 transcription in vivo: the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor mediates transactivation, enhancer-promoter communication, and changes in chromatin structure. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jan;16(1):430–436. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.1.430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ma Q., Dong L., Whitlock J. P., Jr Transcriptional activation by the mouse Ah receptor. Interplay between multiple stimulatory and inhibitory functions. J Biol Chem. 1995 May 26;270(21):12697–12703. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.21.12697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller A. G., Israel D., Whitlock J. P., Jr Biochemical and genetic analysis of variant mouse hepatoma cells defective in the induction of benzo(a)pyrene-metabolizing enzyme activity. J Biol Chem. 1983 Mar 25;258(6):3523–3527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Morgan J. E., Whitlock J. P., Jr Transcription-dependent and transcription-independent nucleosome disruption induced by dioxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 1;89(23):11622–11626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Okey A. B., Riddick D. S., Harper P. A. Molecular biology of the aromatic hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1994 Jul;15(7):226–232. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(94)90316-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Okino S. T., Whitlock J. P., Jr Dioxin induces localized, graded changes in chromatin structure: implications for Cyp1A1 gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jul;15(7):3714–3721. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.7.3714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peterson R. E., Theobald H. M., Kimmel G. L. Developmental and reproductive toxicity of dioxins and related compounds: cross-species comparisons. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1993;23(3):283–335. doi: 10.3109/10408449309105013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Poland A., Knutson J. C. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons: examination of the mechanism of toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1982;22:517–554. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.22.040182.002505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Reyes H., Reisz-Porszasz S., Hankinson O. Identification of the Ah receptor nuclear translocator protein (Arnt) as a component of the DNA binding form of the Ah receptor. Science. 1992 May 22;256(5060):1193–1195. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5060.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sadek C. M., Allen-Hoffmann B. L. Suspension-mediated induction of Hepa 1c1c7 Cyp1a-1 expression is dependent on the Ah receptor signal transduction pathway. J Biol Chem. 1994 Dec 16;269(50):31505–31509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Safe S. H. Comparative toxicology and mechanism of action of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1986;26:371–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.26.040186.002103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schmidt J. V., Carver L. A., Bradfield C. A. Molecular characterization of the murine Ahr gene. Organization, promoter analysis, and chromosomal assignment. J Biol Chem. 1993 Oct 15;268(29):22203–22209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sherwood S. W., Schimke R. T. Cell cycle analysis of apoptosis using flow cytometry. Methods Cell Biol. 1995;46:77–97. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61925-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sherwood S. W., Sheridan J. P., Schimke R. T. Induction of apoptosis by the anti-tubulin drug colcemid: relationship of mitotic checkpoint control to the induction of apoptosis in HeLa S3 cells. Exp Cell Res. 1994 Dec;215(2):373–379. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Swanson H. I., Bradfield C. A. The AH-receptor: genetics, structure and function. Pharmacogenetics. 1993 Oct;3(5):213–230. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199310000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tartakoff A. M. Perturbation of vesicular traffic with the carboxylic ionophore monensin. Cell. 1983 Apr;32(4):1026–1028. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90286-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Whitlock J. P., Jr Mechanistic aspects of dioxin action. Chem Res Toxicol. 1993 Nov-Dec;6(6):754–763. doi: 10.1021/tx00036a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wiebel F. J., Klose U., Kiefer F. Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in vitro: H4IIEC3-derived 5L hepatoma cells as a model system. Toxicol Lett. 1991 Feb;55(2):161–169. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(91)90130-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu L., Whitlock J. P., Jr Mechanism of dioxin action: Ah receptor-mediated increase in promoter accessibility in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 1;89(11):4811–4815. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.11.4811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES