Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1996 Jun;16(6):2670–2677. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.2670

The WRPW motif of the hairy-related basic helix-loop-helix repressor proteins acts as a 4-amino-acid transcription repression and protein-protein interaction domain.

A L Fisher 1, S Ohsako 1, M Caudy 1
PMCID: PMC231257  PMID: 8649374

Abstract

Hairy-related proteins include the Drosophila Hairy and Enhancer of Split proteins and mammalian Hes proteins. These proteins are basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcriptional repressors that control cell fate decisions such as neurogenesis or myogenesis in both Drosophila melanogaster and mammals. Hairy-related proteins are site-specific DNA-binding proteins defined by the presence of both a repressor-specific bHLH DNA binding domain and a carboxyl-terminal WRPW (Trp-Arg-Pro-Trp) motif. These proteins act as repressors by binding to DNA sites in target gene promoters and not by interfering with activator proteins, indicating that these proteins are active repressors which should therefore have specific repression domains. Here we show the WRPW motif to be a functional transcriptional repression domain sufficient to confer active repression to Hairy-related proteins or a heterologous DNA-binding protein, Ga14. This motif was previously shown to be necessary for interactions with Groucho, a genetically defined corepressor for Drosophila Hairy-related proteins. Here we show that the WRPW motif is sufficient to recruit Groucho or the TLE mammalian homologs to target gene promoters. We also show that Groucho and TLE proteins actively repress transcription when directly bound to a target gene promoter and identify a novel, highly conserved transcriptional repression domain in these proteins. These results directly demonstrate that Groucho family proteins are active transcriptional corepressors for Hairy-related proteins and are recruited by the 4-amino acid protein-protein interaction domain, WRPW.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (295.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adnane J., Shao Z., Robbins P. D. The retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product represses transcription when directly bound to the promoter. J Biol Chem. 1995 Apr 14;270(15):8837–8843. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.15.8837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akazawa C., Sasai Y., Nakanishi S., Kageyama R. Molecular characterization of a rat negative regulator with a basic helix-loop-helix structure predominantly expressed in the developing nervous system. J Biol Chem. 1992 Oct 25;267(30):21879–21885. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alonso M. C., Cabrera C. V. The achaete-scute gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster comprises four homologous genes. EMBO J. 1988 Aug;7(8):2585–2591. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03108.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayer D. E., Lawrence Q. A., Eisenman R. N. Mad-Max transcriptional repression is mediated by ternary complex formation with mammalian homologs of yeast repressor Sin3. Cell. 1995 Mar 10;80(5):767–776. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90355-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bailey A. M., Posakony J. W. Suppressor of hairless directly activates transcription of enhancer of split complex genes in response to Notch receptor activity. Genes Dev. 1995 Nov 1;9(21):2609–2622. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.21.2609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benezra R., Davis R. L., Lockshon D., Turner D. L., Weintraub H. The protein Id: a negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90214-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Botas J., Moscoso del Prado J., García-Bellido A. Gene-dose titration analysis in the search of trans-regulatory genes in Drosophila. EMBO J. 1982;1(3):307–310. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01165.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Campos-Ortega J. A., Jan Y. N. Genetic and molecular bases of neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1991;14:399–420. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.14.030191.002151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Campos-Ortega J. A. Mechanisms of early neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurobiol. 1993 Oct;24(10):1305–1327. doi: 10.1002/neu.480241005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Campuzano S., Modolell J. Patterning of the Drosophila nervous system: the achaete-scute gene complex. Trends Genet. 1992 Jun;8(6):202–208. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90234-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Catron K. M., Zhang H., Marshall S. C., Inostroza J. A., Wilson J. M., Abate C. Transcriptional repression by Msx-1 does not require homeodomain DNA-binding sites. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;15(2):861–871. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.2.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Caudy M., Vässin H., Brand M., Tuma R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. daughterless, a Drosophila gene essential for both neurogenesis and sex determination, has sequence similarities to myc and the achaete-scute complex. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):1061–1067. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90250-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen J. D., Evans R. M. A transcriptional co-repressor that interacts with nuclear hormone receptors. Nature. 1995 Oct 5;377(6548):454–457. doi: 10.1038/377454a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cowell I. G. Repression versus activation in the control of gene transcription. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Jan;19(1):38–42. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90172-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cubas P., Modolell J. The extramacrochaetae gene provides information for sensory organ patterning. EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3385–3393. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05417.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cubas P., de Celis J. F., Campuzano S., Modolell J. Proneural clusters of achaete-scute expression and the generation of sensory organs in the Drosophila imaginal wing disc. Genes Dev. 1991 Jun;5(6):996–1008. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.6.996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dawson S. R., Turner D. L., Weintraub H., Parkhurst S. M. Specificity for the hairy/enhancer of split basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins maps outside the bHLH domain and suggests two separable modes of transcriptional repression. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Dec;15(12):6923–6931. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.12.6923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Delidakis C., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. The Enhancer of split [E(spl)] locus of Drosophila encodes seven independent helix-loop-helix proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 15;89(18):8731–8735. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Delidakis C., Preiss A., Hartley D. A., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Two genetically and molecularly distinct functions involved in early neurogenesis reside within the Enhancer of split locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):803–823. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Edmondson D. G., Olson E. N. Helix-loop-helix proteins as regulators of muscle-specific transcription. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jan 15;268(2):755–758. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellis H. M., Spann D. R., Posakony J. W. extramacrochaetae, a negative regulator of sensory organ development in Drosophila, defines a new class of helix-loop-helix proteins. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):27–38. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90212-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Feder J. N., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. A rat gene with sequence homology to the Drosophila gene hairy is rapidly induced by growth factors known to influence neuronal differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jan;13(1):105–113. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fortini M. E., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. The suppressor of hairless protein participates in notch receptor signaling. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):273–282. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90196-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Garrell J., Modolell J. The Drosophila extramacrochaetae locus, an antagonist of proneural genes that, like these genes, encodes a helix-loop-helix protein. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):39–48. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90213-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guillemot F., Joyner A. L. Dynamic expression of the murine Achaete-Scute homologue Mash-1 in the developing nervous system. Mech Dev. 1993 Aug;42(3):171–185. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(93)90006-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Guillemot F., Lo L. C., Johnson J. E., Auerbach A., Anderson D. J., Joyner A. L. Mammalian achaete-scute homolog 1 is required for the early development of olfactory and autonomic neurons. Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):463–476. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90381-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Han K., Levine M. S., Manley J. L. Synergistic activation and repression of transcription by Drosophila homeobox proteins. Cell. 1989 Feb 24;56(4):573–583. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90580-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Han K., Manley J. L. Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila even-skipped protein: definition of a minimal repression domain. Genes Dev. 1993 Mar;7(3):491–503. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.3.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hörlein A. J., När A. M., Heinzel T., Torchia J., Gloss B., Kurokawa R., Ryan A., Kamei Y., Söderström M., Glass C. K. Ligand-independent repression by the thyroid hormone receptor mediated by a nuclear receptor co-repressor. Nature. 1995 Oct 5;377(6548):397–404. doi: 10.1038/377397a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ishibashi M., Moriyoshi K., Sasai Y., Shiota K., Nakanishi S., Kageyama R. Persistent expression of helix-loop-helix factor HES-1 prevents mammalian neural differentiation in the central nervous system. EMBO J. 1994 Apr 15;13(8):1799–1805. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06448.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ishibashi M., Sasai Y., Nakanishi S., Kageyama R. Molecular characterization of HES-2, a mammalian helix-loop-helix factor structurally related to Drosophila hairy and Enhancer of split. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Aug 1;215(3):645–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. Genes required for specifying cell fates in Drosophila embryonic sensory nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 1990 Dec;13(12):493–498. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90083-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. HLH proteins, fly neurogenesis, and vertebrate myogenesis. Cell. 1993 Dec 3;75(5):827–830. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90525-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jarman A. P., Grau Y., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. atonal is a proneural gene that directs chordotonal organ formation in the Drosophila peripheral nervous system. Cell. 1993 Jul 2;73(7):1307–1321. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90358-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jarriault S., Brou C., Logeat F., Schroeter E. H., Kopan R., Israel A. Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. Nature. 1995 Sep 28;377(6547):355–358. doi: 10.1038/377355a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jaynes J. B., O'Farrell P. H. Active repression of transcription by the engrailed homeodomain protein. EMBO J. 1991 Jun;10(6):1427–1433. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07663.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jiménez F., Modolell J. Neural fate specification in Drosophila. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993 Aug;3(4):626–632. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(93)90099-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kania M. A., Bonner A. S., Duffy J. B., Gergen J. P. The Drosophila segmentation gene runt encodes a novel nuclear regulatory protein that is also expressed in the developing nervous system. Genes Dev. 1990 Oct;4(10):1701–1713. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.10.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Keleher C. A., Redd M. J., Schultz J., Carlson M., Johnson A. D. Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):709–719. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Klämbt C., Knust E., Tietze K., Campos-Ortega J. A. Closely related transcripts encoded by the neurogenic gene complex enhancer of split of Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 1989 Jan;8(1):203–210. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03365.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Knust E., Bremer K. A., Vässin H., Ziemer A., Tepass U., Campos-Ortega J. A. The enhancer of split locus and neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1987 Jul;122(1):262–273. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90351-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Knust E., Schrons H., Grawe F., Campos-Ortega J. A. Seven genes of the Enhancer of split complex of Drosophila melanogaster encode helix-loop-helix proteins. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):505–518. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Komachi K., Redd M. J., Johnson A. D. The WD repeats of Tup1 interact with the homeo domain protein alpha 2. Genes Dev. 1994 Dec 1;8(23):2857–2867. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.23.2857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kornau H. C., Schenker L. T., Kennedy M. B., Seeburg P. H. Domain interaction between NMDA receptor subunits and the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95. Science. 1995 Sep 22;269(5231):1737–1740. doi: 10.1126/science.7569905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lecourtois M., Schweisguth F. The neurogenic suppressor of hairless DNA-binding protein mediates the transcriptional activation of the enhancer of split complex genes triggered by Notch signaling. Genes Dev. 1995 Nov 1;9(21):2598–2608. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.21.2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lieber T., Kidd S., Alcamo E., Corbin V., Young M. W. Antineurogenic phenotypes induced by truncated Notch proteins indicate a role in signal transduction and may point to a novel function for Notch in nuclei. Genes Dev. 1993 Oct;7(10):1949–1965. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.10.1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lo L. C., Johnson J. E., Wuenschell C. W., Saito T., Anderson D. J. Mammalian achaete-scute homolog 1 is transiently expressed by spatially restricted subsets of early neuroepithelial and neural crest cells. Genes Dev. 1991 Sep;5(9):1524–1537. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.9.1524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mallo M., Franco del Amo F., Gridley T. Cloning and developmental expression of Grg, a mouse gene related to the groucho transcript of the Drosophila Enhancer of split complex. Mech Dev. 1993 Jul;42(1-2):67–76. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(93)90099-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Martínez C., Modolell J., Garrell J. Regulation of the proneural gene achaete by helix-loop-helix proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jun;13(6):3514–3521. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.6.3514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Miyasaka H., Choudhury B. K., Hou E. W., Li S. S. Molecular cloning and expression of mouse and human cDNA encoding AES and ESG proteins with strong similarity to Drosophila enhancer of split groucho protein. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Aug 15;216(1):343–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18151.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Murre C., McCaw P. S., Baltimore D. A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell. 1989 Mar 10;56(5):777–783. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90682-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Murre C., McCaw P. S., Vaessin H., Caudy M., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N., Cabrera C. V., Buskin J. N., Hauschka S. D., Lassar A. B. Interactions between heterologous helix-loop-helix proteins generate complexes that bind specifically to a common DNA sequence. Cell. 1989 Aug 11;58(3):537–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90434-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Oellers N., Dehio M., Knust E. bHLH proteins encoded by the Enhancer of split complex of Drosophila negatively interfere with transcriptional activation mediated by proneural genes. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Sep 1;244(5):465–473. doi: 10.1007/BF00583897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ogawa E., Maruyama M., Kagoshima H., Inuzuka M., Lu J., Satake M., Shigesada K., Ito Y. PEBP2/PEA2 represents a family of transcription factors homologous to the products of the Drosophila runt gene and the human AML1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 15;90(14):6859–6863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ohsako S., Hyer J., Panganiban G., Oliver I., Caudy M. Hairy function as a DNA-binding helix-loop-helix repressor of Drosophila sensory organ formation. Genes Dev. 1994 Nov 15;8(22):2743–2755. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.22.2743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Paroush Z., Finley R. L., Jr, Kidd T., Wainwright S. M., Ingham P. W., Brent R., Ish-Horowicz D. Groucho is required for Drosophila neurogenesis, segmentation, and sex determination and interacts directly with hairy-related bHLH proteins. Cell. 1994 Dec 2;79(5):805–815. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90070-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Roth S. Y. Chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression in yeast. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Apr;5(2):168–173. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(95)80004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Rudnicki M. A., Jaenisch R. The MyoD family of transcription factors and skeletal myogenesis. Bioessays. 1995 Mar;17(3):203–209. doi: 10.1002/bies.950170306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rushlow C. A., Hogan A., Pinchin S. M., Howe K. M., Lardelli M., Ish-Horowicz D. The Drosophila hairy protein acts in both segmentation and bristle patterning and shows homology to N-myc. EMBO J. 1989 Oct;8(10):3095–3103. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08461.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sasai Y., Kageyama R., Tagawa Y., Shigemoto R., Nakanishi S. Two mammalian helix-loop-helix factors structurally related to Drosophila hairy and Enhancer of split. Genes Dev. 1992 Dec;6(12B):2620–2634. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.12b.2620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Schmidt C. J., Sladek T. E. A rat homolog of the Drosophila enhancer of split (groucho) locus lacking WD-40 repeats. J Biol Chem. 1993 Dec 5;268(34):25681–25686. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Schreiber-Agus N., Chin L., Chen K., Torres R., Rao G., Guida P., Skoultchi A. I., DePinho R. A. An amino-terminal domain of Mxi1 mediates anti-Myc oncogenic activity and interacts with a homolog of the yeast transcriptional repressor SIN3. Cell. 1995 Mar 10;80(5):777–786. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90356-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Schrons H., Knust E., Campos-Ortega J. A. The Enhancer of split complex and adjacent genes in the 96F region of Drosophila melanogaster are required for segregation of neural and epidermal progenitor cells. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):481–503. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Skeath J. B., Carroll S. B. Regulation of achaete-scute gene expression and sensory organ pattern formation in the Drosophila wing. Genes Dev. 1991 Jun;5(6):984–995. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.6.984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stifani S., Blaumueller C. M., Redhead N. J., Hill R. E., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Human homologs of a Drosophila Enhancer of split gene product define a novel family of nuclear proteins. Nat Genet. 1992 Oct;2(2):119–127. doi: 10.1038/ng1092-119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Struhl G., Fitzgerald K., Greenwald I. Intrinsic activity of the Lin-12 and Notch intracellular domains in vivo. Cell. 1993 Jul 30;74(2):331–345. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90424-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Takebayashi K., Akazawa C., Nakanishi S., Kageyama R. Structure and promoter analysis of the gene encoding the mouse helix-loop-helix factor HES-5. Identification of the neural precursor cell-specific promoter element. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jan 20;270(3):1342–1349. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.3.1342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Takebayashi K., Sasai Y., Sakai Y., Watanabe T., Nakanishi S., Kageyama R. Structure, chromosomal locus, and promoter analysis of the gene encoding the mouse helix-loop-helix factor HES-1. Negative autoregulation through the multiple N box elements. J Biol Chem. 1994 Feb 18;269(7):5150–5156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Tata F., Hartley D. A. The role of the enhancer of split complex during cell fate determination in Drosophila. Dev Suppl. 1993:139–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Tietze K., Oellers N., Knust E. Enhancer of splitD, a dominant mutation of Drosophila, and its use in the study of functional domains of a helix-loop-helix protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 1;89(13):6152–6156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.6152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Tzamarias D., Struhl K. Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex. Nature. 1994 Jun 30;369(6483):758–761. doi: 10.1038/369758a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Van Doren M., Bailey A. M., Esnayra J., Ede K., Posakony J. W. Negative regulation of proneural gene activity: hairy is a direct transcriptional repressor of achaete. Genes Dev. 1994 Nov 15;8(22):2729–2742. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.22.2729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Van Doren M., Ellis H. M., Posakony J. W. The Drosophila extramacrochaetae protein antagonizes sequence-specific DNA binding by daughterless/achaete-scute protein complexes. Development. 1991 Sep;113(1):245–255. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.1.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Van Doren M., Powell P. A., Pasternak D., Singson A., Posakony J. W. Spatial regulation of proneural gene activity: auto- and cross-activation of achaete is antagonized by extramacrochaetae. Genes Dev. 1992 Dec;6(12B):2592–2605. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.12b.2592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Villares R., Cabrera C. V. The achaete-scute gene complex of D. melanogaster: conserved domains in a subset of genes required for neurogenesis and their homology to myc. Cell. 1987 Jul 31;50(3):415–424. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90495-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wainwright S. M., Ish-Horowicz D. Point mutations in the Drosophila hairy gene demonstrate in vivo requirements for basic, helix-loop-helix, and WRPW domains. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jun;12(6):2475–2483. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.6.2475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Weintraub H., Davis R., Tapscott S., Thayer M., Krause M., Benezra R., Blackwell T. K., Turner D., Rupp R., Hollenberg S. The myoD gene family: nodal point during specification of the muscle cell lineage. Science. 1991 Feb 15;251(4995):761–766. doi: 10.1126/science.1846704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Weintraub H. The MyoD family and myogenesis: redundancy, networks, and thresholds. Cell. 1993 Dec 31;75(7):1241–1244. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90610-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Weintraub S. J., Chow K. N., Luo R. X., Zhang S. H., He S., Dean D. C. Mechanism of active transcriptional repression by the retinoblastoma protein. Nature. 1995 Jun 29;375(6534):812–815. doi: 10.1038/375812a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Weintraub S. J., Prater C. A., Dean D. C. Retinoblastoma protein switches the E2F site from positive to negative element. Nature. 1992 Jul 16;358(6383):259–261. doi: 10.1038/358259a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES