Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1996 Jun;16(6):2678–2688. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.2678

Repression by HoxA7 is mediated by the homeodomain and the modulatory action of its N-terminal-arm residues.

C A Schnabel 1, C Abate-Shen 1
PMCID: PMC231258  PMID: 8649375

Abstract

Hox genes encode homeodomain-containing proteins that are presumed to control spatial patterning during murine embryogenesis through their actions as transcriptional regulatory proteins. In this study, we have investigated the transcriptional function of a prototypic member of this family, HoxA7. We demonstrate that HoxA7 function as a potent transcriptional repressor and that its action as such requires several domains, including both activator and repressor regions. The repressor regions are contained within the homeodomain and a C-terminal acidic region, both of which are well conserved among members of the Hox family. Accordingly, we show that two other members of this family also function as repressors, although they vary in their relative repressor potency. Finally, we explore the novel observation that the homeodomain of HoxA7 functions as a transcriptional repressor domain. We show that the homeodomain compared with two other DNA-binding domains, is unique in its ability to function as a repressor domain and that repression requires conserved residues, in helix III. We further show that residues in the N-terminal arm of the homeodomain contribute to the differential repressor actions of various Hox proteins. These findings demonstrate that the transcriptional function of HoxA7 and possibility of Hox proteins in general is determined by their unique combination of conserved and nonconserved regions as well as through the complex actions of their homeodomains.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (453.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abate C., Luk D., Curran T. Transcriptional regulation by Fos and Jun in vitro: interaction among multiple activator and regulatory domains. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jul;11(7):3624–3632. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akam M. Hox and HOM: homologous gene clusters in insects and vertebrates. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):347–349. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90909-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrew D. J., Scott M. P. Downstream of the homeotic genes. New Biol. 1992 Jan;4(1):5–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Appel B., Sakonju S. Cell-type-specific mechanisms of transcriptional repression by the homeotic gene products UBX and ABD-A in Drosophila embryos. EMBO J. 1993 Mar;12(3):1099–1109. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05751.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Balling R., Mutter G., Gruss P., Kessel M. Craniofacial abnormalities induced by ectopic expression of the homeobox gene Hox-1.1 in transgenic mice. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):337–347. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90848-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Catron K. M., Iler N., Abate C. Nucleotides flanking a conserved TAAT core dictate the DNA binding specificity of three murine homeodomain proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):2354–2365. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Catron K. M., Zhang H., Marshall S. C., Inostroza J. A., Wilson J. M., Abate C. Transcriptional repression by Msx-1 does not require homeodomain DNA-binding sites. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;15(2):861–871. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.2.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan S. K., Jaffe L., Capovilla M., Botas J., Mann R. S. The DNA binding specificity of Ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):603–615. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90525-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chan S. K., Mann R. S. The segment identity functions of Ultrabithorax are contained within its homeo domain and carboxy-terminal sequences. Genes Dev. 1993 May;7(5):796–811. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.5.796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang C. P., Shen W. F., Rozenfeld S., Lawrence H. J., Largman C., Cleary M. L. Pbx proteins display hexapeptide-dependent cooperative DNA binding with a subset of Hox proteins. Genes Dev. 1995 Mar 15;9(6):663–674. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.6.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Condie B. G., Capecchi M. R. Mice with targeted disruptions in the paralogous genes hoxa-3 and hoxd-3 reveal synergistic interactions. Nature. 1994 Jul 28;370(6487):304–307. doi: 10.1038/370304a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Corsetti M. T., Briata P., Sanseverino L., Daga A., Airoldi I., Simeone A., Palmisano G., Angelini C., Boncinelli E., Corte G. Differential DNA binding properties of three human homeodomain proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Sep 11;20(17):4465–4472. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.17.4465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis A. P., Witte D. P., Hsieh-Li H. M., Potter S. S., Capecchi M. R. Absence of radius and ulna in mice lacking hoxa-11 and hoxd-11. Nature. 1995 Jun 29;375(6534):791–795. doi: 10.1038/375791a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dollé P., Dierich A., LeMeur M., Schimmang T., Schuhbaur B., Chambon P., Duboule D. Disruption of the Hoxd-13 gene induces localized heterochrony leading to mice with neotenic limbs. Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):431–441. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90378-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dollé P., Izpisúa-Belmonte J. C., Falkenstein H., Renucci A., Duboule D. Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5 complex homoeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation. Nature. 1989 Dec 14;342(6251):767–772. doi: 10.1038/342767a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Du W., Thanos D., Maniatis T. Mechanisms of transcriptional synergism between distinct virus-inducible enhancer elements. Cell. 1993 Sep 10;74(5):887–898. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90468-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gehring W. J., Qian Y. Q., Billeter M., Furukubo-Tokunaga K., Schier A. F., Resendez-Perez D., Affolter M., Otting G., Wüthrich K. Homeodomain-DNA recognition. Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):211–223. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90292-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gibson G., Schier A., LeMotte P., Gehring W. J. The specificities of Sex combs reduced and Antennapedia are defined by a distinct portion of each protein that includes the homeodomain. Cell. 1990 Sep 21;62(6):1087–1103. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90386-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Graham A., Papalopulu N., Krumlauf R. The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):367–378. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90912-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gray S., Szymanski P., Levine M. Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. Genes Dev. 1994 Aug 1;8(15):1829–1838. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.15.1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gross M. K., Gruss P. Functional analysis of mouse Hoxa-7 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: sequences outside the homeodomain base contact zone influence binding and activation. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):238–254. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Han K., Manley J. L. Functional domains of the Drosophila Engrailed protein. EMBO J. 1993 Jul;12(7):2723–2733. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05934.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Iler N., Rowitch D. H., Echelard Y., McMahon A. P., Abate-Shen C. A single homeodomain binding site restricts spatial expression of Wnt-1 in the developing brain. Mech Dev. 1995 Sep;53(1):87–96. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00427-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ishikawa H., Asano M., Kanda T., Kumar S., Gélinas C., Ito Y. Two novel functions associated with the Rel oncoproteins: DNA replication and cell-specific transcriptional activation. Oncogene. 1993 Nov;8(11):2889–2896. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jain J., McCaffrey P. G., Miner Z., Kerppola T. K., Lambert J. N., Verdine G. L., Curran T., Rao A. The T-cell transcription factor NFATp is a substrate for calcineurin and interacts with Fos and Jun. Nature. 1993 Sep 23;365(6444):352–355. doi: 10.1038/365352a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jiang J., Cai H., Zhou Q., Levine M. Conversion of a dorsal-dependent silencer into an enhancer: evidence for dorsal corepressors. EMBO J. 1993 Aug;12(8):3201–3209. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05989.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnson A. D. The price of repression. Cell. 1995 Jun 2;81(5):655–658. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90524-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson F. B., Parker E., Krasnow M. A. Extradenticle protein is a selective cofactor for the Drosophila homeotics: role of the homeodomain and YPWM amino acid motif in the interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 31;92(3):739–743. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.3.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kessel M., Balling R., Gruss P. Variations of cervical vertebrae after expression of a Hox-1.1 transgene in mice. Cell. 1990 Apr 20;61(2):301–308. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90810-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kessel M., Schulze F., Fibi M., Gruss P. Primary structure and nuclear localization of a murine homeodomain protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5306–5310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Krumlauf R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):191–201. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90290-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuziora M. A., McGinnis W. A homeodomain substitution changes the regulatory specificity of the deformed protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):563–571. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lefstin J. A., Thomas J. R., Yamamoto K. R. Influence of a steroid receptor DNA-binding domain on transcriptional regulatory functions. Genes Dev. 1994 Dec 1;8(23):2842–2856. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.23.2842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Levine M., Hoey T. Homeobox proteins as sequence-specific transcription factors. Cell. 1988 Nov 18;55(4):537–540. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90209-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Levine M., Manley J. L. Transcriptional repression of eukaryotic promoters. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):405–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90024-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Licht J. D., Hanna-Rose W., Reddy J. C., English M. A., Ro M., Grossel M., Shaknovich R., Hansen U. Mapping and mutagenesis of the amino-terminal transcriptional repression domain of the Drosophila Krüppel protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):4057–4066. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.4057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin L., McGinnis W. Mapping functional specificity in the Dfd and Ubx homeo domains. Genes Dev. 1992 Jun;6(6):1071–1081. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lu Q., Knoepfler P. S., Scheele J., Wright D. D., Kamps M. P. Both Pbx1 and E2A-Pbx1 bind the DNA motif ATCAATCAA cooperatively with the products of multiple murine Hox genes, some of which are themselves oncogenes. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jul;15(7):3786–3795. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.7.3786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mahon K. A., Westphal H., Gruss P. Expression of homeobox gene Hox 1.1 during mouse embryogenesis. Development. 1988;104 (Suppl):187–195. doi: 10.1242/dev.104.Supplement.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Manak J. R., Mathies L. D., Scott M. P. Regulation of a decapentaplegic midgut enhancer by homeotic proteins. Development. 1994 Dec;120(12):3605–3619. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.12.3605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mann R. S., Hogness D. S. Functional dissection of Ultrabithorax proteins in D. melanogaster. Cell. 1990 Feb 23;60(4):597–610. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90663-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Martin G. R. Teratocarcinomas and mammalian embryogenesis. Science. 1980 Aug 15;209(4458):768–776. doi: 10.1126/science.6250214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. McGinnis W., Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell. 1992 Jan 24;68(2):283–302. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mitchell P. J., Tjian R. Transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Science. 1989 Jul 28;245(4916):371–378. doi: 10.1126/science.2667136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Monuki E. S., Kuhn R., Lemke G. Cell-specific action and mutable structure of a transcription factor effector domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 1;90(21):9978–9982. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.9978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Monuki E. S., Kuhn R., Lemke G. Repression of the myelin P0 gene by the POU transcription factor SCIP. Mech Dev. 1993 Jul;42(1-2):15–32. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(93)90095-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pellerin I., Schnabel C., Catron K. M., Abate C. Hox proteins have different affinities for a consensus DNA site that correlate with the positions of their genes on the hox cluster. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;14(7):4532–4545. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Phelan M. L., Rambaldi I., Featherstone M. S. Cooperative interactions between HOX and PBX proteins mediated by a conserved peptide motif. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;15(8):3989–3997. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.8.3989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Phelan M. L., Sadoul R., Featherstone M. S. Functional differences between HOX proteins conferred by two residues in the homeodomain N-terminal arm. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Aug;14(8):5066–5075. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.8.5066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pöpperl H., Bienz M., Studer M., Chan S. K., Aparicio S., Brenner S., Mann R. S., Krumlauf R. Segmental expression of Hoxb-1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/pbx. Cell. 1995 Jun 30;81(7):1031–1042. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Roberts S. G., Green M. R. Transcription. Dichotomous regulators. Nature. 1995 May 11;375(6527):105–106. doi: 10.1038/375105a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sadowski I., Bell B., Broad P., Hollis M. GAL4 fusion vectors for expression in yeast or mammalian cells. Gene. 1992 Sep 1;118(1):137–141. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90261-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Scott M. P., Tamkun J. W., Hartzell G. W., 3rd The structure and function of the homeodomain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989 Jul 28;989(1):25–48. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(89)90033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Scott M. P. Vertebrate homeobox gene nomenclature. Cell. 1992 Nov 13;71(4):551–553. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90588-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sordino P., van der Hoeven F., Duboule D. Hox gene expression in teleost fins and the origin of vertebrate digits. Nature. 1995 Jun 22;375(6533):678–681. doi: 10.1038/375678a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Stark M. R., Johnson A. D. Interaction between two homeodomain proteins is specified by a short C-terminal tail. Nature. 1994 Sep 29;371(6496):429–432. doi: 10.1038/371429a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sukovich D. A., Mukherjee R., Benfield P. A. A novel, cell-type-specific mechanism for estrogen receptor-mediated gene activation in the absence of an estrogen-responsive element. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Nov;14(11):7134–7143. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.11.7134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sun B., Hursh D. A., Jackson D., Beachy P. A. Ultrabithorax protein is necessary but not sufficient for full activation of decapentaplegic expression in the visceral mesoderm. EMBO J. 1995 Feb 1;14(3):520–535. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07028.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Usheva A., Maldonado E., Goldring A., Lu H., Houbavi C., Reinberg D., Aloni Y. Specific interaction between the nonphosphorylated form of RNA polymerase II and the TATA-binding protein. Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):871–881. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90297-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wilkinson D. G., Bhatt S., Cook M., Boncinelli E., Krumlauf R. Segmental expression of Hox-2 homoeobox-containing genes in the developing mouse hindbrain. Nature. 1989 Oct 5;341(6241):405–409. doi: 10.1038/341405a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Xue D., Tu Y., Chalfie M. Cooperative interactions between the Caenorhabditis elegans homeoproteins UNC-86 and MEC-3. Science. 1993 Sep 3;261(5126):1324–1328. doi: 10.1126/science.8103239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zappavigna V., Sartori D., Mavilio F. Specificity of HOX protein function depends on DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions, both mediated by the homeo domain. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 15;8(6):732–744. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zeng W., Andrew D. J., Mathies L. D., Horner M. A., Scott M. P. Ectopic expression and function of the Antp and Scr homeotic genes: the N terminus of the homeodomain is critical to functional specificity. Development. 1993 Jun;118(2):339–352. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.2.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang H., Catron K. M., Abate-Shen C. A role for the Msx-1 homeodomain in transcriptional regulation: residues in the N-terminal arm mediate TATA binding protein interaction and transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Mar 5;93(5):1764–1769. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.5.1764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. van Dijk M. A., Murre C. extradenticle raises the DNA binding specificity of homeotic selector gene products. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):617–624. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90526-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES