Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1996 Jun;16(6):2951–2957. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.2951

Effects of terminal nonhomology and homeology on double-strand-break-induced gene conversion tract directionality.

H H Nelson 1, D B Sweetser 1, J A Nickoloff 1
PMCID: PMC231289  PMID: 8649406

Abstract

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) greatly enhance gene conversion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In prior plasmid x chromosome crosses, conversion tracts were often short ( < 53 bp) and usually extended in only one direction from a DSB in an HO recognition sequence inserted into ura3. To allow fine-structure analysis of short and unidirectional tracts, phenotypically silent markers were introduced at 3- and 6-bp intervals flanking the HO site. These markers, which created a 70-bp homeologous region (71% homology), greatly increased the proportion of bidirectional tracts. Among products with short or unidirectional tracts, 85% were highly directional, converting markers on only one side (the nearest marker being 6 bp from the HO site). A DSB in an HO site insertion creates terminal nonhomologies. The high degree of directionality is a likely consequence of the precise cleavage at homology/nonhomology borders in hybrid DNA by Rad1/10 endonuclease. In contrast, terminal homeology alone yielded mostly unidirectional tracts. Thus, nonhomology flanked by homeology yields primarily bidirectional tracts, but terminal homeology or nonhomology alone yields primarily unidirectional tracts. These results are inconsistent with uni- and bidirectional tracts arising from one- and two-ended invasion mechanisms, respectively, as reduced homology would be expected to favor one-ended events. Tract spectra with terminal homeology alone with similar in RAD1 and rad1 cells, indicating that the high proportion of bidirectional tracts seen with homeology flanking nonhomology is not a consequence of Rad1/10 cleavage at homology/homeology boundaries. Instead, tract directionality appears to reflect the influence of the degree of broken-end homology on mismatch repair.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (292.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailis A. M., Rothstein R. A defect in mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stimulates ectopic recombination between homeologous genes by an excision repair dependent process. Genetics. 1990 Nov;126(3):535–547. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Belmaaza A., Chartrand P. One-sided invasion events in homologous recombination at double-strand breaks. Mutat Res. 1994 May;314(3):199–208. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)90065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bishop D. K., Andersen J., Kolodner R. D. Specificity of mismatch repair following transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with heteroduplex plasmid DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(10):3713–3717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bishop D. K., Kolodner R. D. Repair of heteroduplex plasmid DNA after transformation into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;6(10):3401–3409. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.10.3401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Connolly B., White C. I., Haber J. E. Physical monitoring of mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;8(6):2342–2349. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.6.2342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DasGupta C., Radding C. M. Lower fidelity of RecA protein catalysed homologous pairing with a superhelical substrate. Nature. 1982 Jan 7;295(5844):71–73. doi: 10.1038/295071a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng W. P., Nickoloff J. A. Mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA intermediates of extrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):400–406. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deng W. P., Nickoloff J. A. Site-directed mutagenesis of virtually any plasmid by eliminating a unique site. Anal Biochem. 1992 Jan;200(1):81–88. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90280-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Detloff P., Sieber J., Petes T. D. Repair of specific base pair mismatches formed during meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):737–745. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Detloff P., White M. A., Petes T. D. Analysis of a gene conversion gradient at the HIS4 locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):113–123. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fishman-Lobell J., Haber J. E. Removal of nonhomologous DNA ends in double-strand break recombination: the role of the yeast ultraviolet repair gene RAD1. Science. 1992 Oct 16;258(5081):480–484. doi: 10.1126/science.1411547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fishman-Lobell J., Rudin N., Haber J. E. Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;12(3):1292–1303. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fujimura H., Sakuma Y. Simplified isolation of chromosomal and plasmid DNA from yeasts. Biotechniques. 1993 Apr;14(4):538–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gunn L., Nickoloff J. A. Rapid transfer of low copy-number episomal plasmids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Escherichia coli by electroporation. Mol Biotechnol. 1995 Apr;3(2):79–84. doi: 10.1007/BF02789103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hare J. T., Taylor J. H. One role for DNA methylation in vertebrate cells is strand discrimination in mismatch repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Nov;82(21):7350–7354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.21.7350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Harris S., Rudnicki K. S., Haber J. E. Gene conversions and crossing over during homologous and homeologous ectopic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hastings P. J., McGill C., Shafer B., Strathern J. N. Ends-in vs. ends-out recombination in yeast. Genetics. 1993 Dec;135(4):973–980. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.4.973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kolodkin A. L., Klar A. J., Stahl F. W. Double-strand breaks can initiate meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1986 Aug 29;46(5):733–740. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90349-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kramer B., Kramer W., Williamson M. S., Fogel S. Heteroduplex DNA correction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mismatch specific and requires functional PMS genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;9(10):4432–4440. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.10.4432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lahue R. S., Au K. G., Modrich P. DNA mismatch correction in a defined system. Science. 1989 Jul 14;245(4914):160–164. doi: 10.1126/science.2665076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Larionov V., Kouprina N., Eldarov M., Perkins E., Porter G., Resnick M. A. Transformation-associated recombination between diverged and homologous DNA repeats is induced by strand breaks. Yeast. 1994 Jan;10(1):93–104. doi: 10.1002/yea.320100109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McGill C. B., Shafer B. K., Derr L. K., Strathern J. N. Recombination initiated by double-strand breaks. Curr Genet. 1993;23(4):305–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00310891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meselson M. S., Radding C. M. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mézard C., Pompon D., Nicolas A. Recombination between similar but not identical DNA sequences during yeast transformation occurs within short stretches of identity. Cell. 1992 Aug 21;70(4):659–670. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90434-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nassif N., Penney J., Pal S., Engels W. R., Gloor G. B. Efficient copying of nonhomologous sequences from ectopic sites via P-element-induced gap repair. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Mar;14(3):1613–1625. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nickoloff J. A., Chen E. Y., Heffron F. A 24-base-pair DNA sequence from the MAT locus stimulates intergenic recombination in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7831–7835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nickoloff J. A., Singer J. D., Heffron F. In vivo analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO nuclease recognition site by site-directed mutagenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Mar;10(3):1174–1179. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.3.1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nickoloff J. A., Singer J. D., Hoekstra M. F., Heffron F. Double-strand breaks stimulate alternative mechanisms of recombination repair. J Mol Biol. 1989 Jun 5;207(3):527–541. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90462-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nicolas A., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. An initiation site for meiotic gene conversion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):35–39. doi: 10.1038/338035a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W., Rothstein R. J. Yeast transformation: a model system for the study of recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):6354–6358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Porter S. E., White M. A., Petes T. D. Genetic evidence that the meiotic recombination hotspot at the HIS4 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not represent a site for a symmetrically processed double-strand break. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):5–19. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Prado F., Aguilera A. Role of reciprocal exchange, one-ended invasion crossover and single-strand annealing on inverted and direct repeat recombination in yeast: different requirements for the RAD1, RAD10, and RAD52 genes. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):109–123. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Priebe S. D., Westmoreland J., Nilsson-Tillgren T., Resnick M. A. Induction of recombination between homologous and diverged DNAs by double-strand gaps and breaks and role of mismatch repair. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;14(7):4802–4814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Radding C. M. Homologous pairing and strand exchange in genetic recombination. Annu Rev Genet. 1982;16:405–437. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.16.120182.002201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ray A., Machin N., Stahl F. W. A DNA double chain break stimulates triparental recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6225–6229. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ray A., Siddiqi I., Kolodkin A. L., Stahl F. W. Intra-chromosomal gene conversion induced by a DNA double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol. 1988 May 20;201(2):247–260. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90136-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ray B. L., White C. I., Haber J. E. Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the "stuck" mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):5372–5380. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rayssiguier C., Thaler D. S., Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989 Nov 23;342(6248):396–401. doi: 10.1038/342396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Resnick M. A. The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J Theor Biol. 1976 Jun;59(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Resnick M. A., Zgaga Z., Hieter P., Westmoreland J., Fogel S., Nilsson-Tillgren T. Recombinant repair of diverged DNAs: a study of homoeologous chromosomes and mammalian YACs in yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Jul;234(1):65–73. doi: 10.1007/BF00272346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Roitgrund C., Steinlauf R., Kupiec M. Donation of information to the unbroken chromosome in double-strand break repair. Curr Genet. 1993 May-Jun;23(5-6):414–422. doi: 10.1007/BF00312628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rothstein R. J. One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:202–211. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rudin N., Haber J. E. Efficient repair of HO-induced chromosomal breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by recombination between flanking homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;8(9):3918–3928. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.9.3918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rudin N., Sugarman E., Haber J. E. Genetic and physical analysis of double-strand break repair and recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):519–534. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell. 1995 Dec 1;83(5):783–791. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90191-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Selva E. M., New L., Crouse G. F., Lahue R. S. Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1175–1188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sugawara N., Haber J. E. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;12(2):563–575. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.2.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sun H., Treco D., Szostak J. W. Extensive 3'-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90270-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sweetser D. B., Hough H., Whelden J. F., Arbuckle M., Nickoloff J. A. Fine-resolution mapping of spontaneous and double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals reversible mitotic conversion polarity. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):3863–3875. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.3863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Symington L. S. Double-strand-break repair and recombination catalyzed by a nuclear extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1991 Apr;10(4):987–996. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08033.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Thaler D. S., Stahl F. W. DNA double-chain breaks in recombination of phage lambda and of yeast. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:169–197. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.001125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Differential effects of base-pair mismatch on intrachromosomal versus extrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5340–5344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. White C. I., Haber J. E. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1990 Mar;9(3):663–673. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08158.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES