Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1996 Jul;16(7):3637–3650. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.7.3637

Signaling in the yeast pheromone response pathway: specific and high-affinity interaction of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases Kss1 and Fus3 with the upstream MAP kinase kinase Ste7.

L Bardwell 1, J G Cook 1, E C Chang 1, B R Cairns 1, J Thorner 1
PMCID: PMC231359  PMID: 8668180

Abstract

Kss1 and Fus3 are mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs or ERKs), and Ste7 is their activating MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK), in the pheromone response pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To investigate the potential role of specific interactions between these enzymes during signaling, their ability to associate with each other was examined both in solution and in vivo. When synthesized by in vitro translation, Kss1 and Fus3 could each form a tight complex (Kd of approximately 5 nM) with Ste7 in the absence of any additional yeast proteins. These complexes were specific because neither Hog1 nor Mpk1 (two other yeast MAPKs), nor mammalian Erk2, was able to associate detectably with Ste7. Neither the kinase catalytic core of Ste7 nor the phosphoacceptor regions of Ste7 and Kss1 were necessary for complex formation. Ste7-Kss1 (and Ste7-Fus3) complexes were present in yeast cell extracts and were undiminished in extracts prepared from a ste5delta-ste11delta double mutant strain. In Ste7-Kss1 (or Ste7-Fus3) complexes isolated from naive or pheromone-treated cells, Ste7 phosphorylated Kss1 (or Fus3), and Kss1 (or Fus3) phosphorylated Ste7, in a pheromone-stimulated manner; dissociation of the high-affinity complex was shown to be required for either phosphorylation event. Deletions of Ste7 in the region required for its stable association with Kss1 and Fus3 in vitro significantly decreased (but did not eliminate) signaling in vivo. These findings suggest that the high-affinity and active site-independent binding observed in vitro facilitates signal transduction in vivo and suggest further that MEK-MAPK interactions may utilize a double-selection mechanism to ensure fidelity in signal transmission and to insulate one signaling pathway from another.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (990.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahn N. G., Seger R., Krebs E. G. The mitogen-activated protein kinase activator. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992 Dec;4(6):992–999. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(92)90131-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ammerer G. Sex, stress and integrity: the importance of MAP kinases in yeast. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994 Feb;4(1):90–95. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(94)90096-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Avruch J., Zhang X. F., Kyriakis J. M. Raf meets Ras: completing the framework of a signal transduction pathway. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Jul;19(7):279–283. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardwell A. J., Bardwell L., Iyer N., Svejstrup J. Q., Feaver W. J., Kornberg R. D., Friedberg E. C. Yeast nucleotide excision repair proteins Rad2 and Rad4 interact with RNA polymerase II basal transcription factor b (TFIIH). Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):3569–3576. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.3569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bardwell L., Cook J. G., Inouye C. J., Thorner J. Signal propagation and regulation in the mating pheromone response pathway of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Dev Biol. 1994 Dec;166(2):363–379. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bardwell L., Cooper A. J., Friedberg E. C. Stable and specific association between the yeast recombination and DNA repair proteins RAD1 and RAD10 in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;12(7):3041–3049. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.3041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bax B., Jhoti H. Protein-protein interactions. Putting the pieces together. Curr Biol. 1995 Oct 1;5(10):1119–1121. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00226-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blumer K. J., Johnson G. L. Diversity in function and regulation of MAP kinase pathways. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Jun;19(6):236–240. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90147-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boeke J. D., Trueheart J., Natsoulis G., Fink G. R. 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol. 1987;154:164–175. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)54076-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boguslawski G. PBS2, a yeast gene encoding a putative protein kinase, interacts with the RAS2 pathway and affects osmotic sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol. 1992 Nov;138(11):2425–2432. doi: 10.1099/00221287-138-11-2425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boulton T. G., Nye S. H., Robbins D. J., Ip N. Y., Radziejewska E., Morgenbesser S. D., DePinho R. A., Panayotatos N., Cobb M. H., Yancopoulos G. D. ERKs: a family of protein-serine/threonine kinases that are activated and tyrosine phosphorylated in response to insulin and NGF. Cell. 1991 May 17;65(4):663–675. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90098-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brewster J. L., de Valoir T., Dwyer N. D., Winter E., Gustin M. C. An osmosensing signal transduction pathway in yeast. Science. 1993 Mar 19;259(5102):1760–1763. doi: 10.1126/science.7681220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brill J. A., Elion E. A., Fink G. R. A role for autophosphorylation revealed by activated alleles of FUS3, the yeast MAP kinase homolog. Mol Biol Cell. 1994 Mar;5(3):297–312. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.3.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cairns B. R., Ramer S. W., Kornberg R. D. Order of action of components in the yeast pheromone response pathway revealed with a dominant allele of the STE11 kinase and the multiple phosphorylation of the STE7 kinase. Genes Dev. 1992 Jul;6(7):1305–1318. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.7.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Campbell J. S., Seger R., Graves J. D., Graves L. M., Jensen A. M., Krebs E. G. The MAP kinase cascade. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1995;50:131–159. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-571150-0.50011-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cano E., Mahadevan L. C. Parallel signal processing among mammalian MAPKs. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Mar;20(3):117–122. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)88978-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Choi K. Y., Satterberg B., Lyons D. M., Elion E. A. Ste5 tethers multiple protein kinases in the MAP kinase cascade required for mating in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1994 Aug 12;78(3):499–512. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90427-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ciejek E., Thorner J. Recovery of S. cerevisiae a cells from G1 arrest by alpha factor pheromone requires endopeptidase action. Cell. 1979 Nov;18(3):623–635. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90117-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cobb M. H., Goldsmith E. J. How MAP kinases are regulated. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jun 23;270(25):14843–14846. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.25.14843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cohen G. B., Ren R., Baltimore D. Modular binding domains in signal transduction proteins. Cell. 1995 Jan 27;80(2):237–248. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90406-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Company M., Adler C., Errede B. Identification of a Ty1 regulatory sequence responsive to STE7 and STE12. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;8(6):2545–2554. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.6.2545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Courchesne W. E., Kunisawa R., Thorner J. A putative protein kinase overcomes pheromone-induced arrest of cell cycling in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1989 Sep 22;58(6):1107–1119. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90509-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Davis J. L., Kunisawa R., Thorner J. A presumptive helicase (MOT1 gene product) affects gene expression and is required for viability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1879–1892. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Davis R. J. MAPKs: new JNK expands the group. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Nov;19(11):470–473. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90132-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Davis R. J. The mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jul 15;268(20):14553–14556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Duyster J., Baskaran R., Wang J. Y. Src homology 2 domain as a specificity determinant in the c-Abl-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal repeated domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Feb 28;92(5):1555–1559. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Elion E. A., Brill J. A., Fink G. R. FUS3 represses CLN1 and CLN2 and in concert with KSS1 promotes signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9392–9396. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Elion E. A., Grisafi P. L., Fink G. R. FUS3 encodes a cdc2+/CDC28-related kinase required for the transition from mitosis into conjugation. Cell. 1990 Feb 23;60(4):649–664. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90668-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Elion E. A., Satterberg B., Kranz J. E. FUS3 phosphorylates multiple components of the mating signal transduction cascade: evidence for STE12 and FAR1. Mol Biol Cell. 1993 May;4(5):495–510. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.5.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Elion E. A. Ste5: a meeting place for MAP kinases and their associates. Trends Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;5(8):322–327. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89055-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Erickson A. K., Payne D. M., Martino P. A., Rossomando A. J., Shabanowitz J., Weber M. J., Hunt D. F., Sturgill T. W. Identification by mass spectrometry of threonine 97 in bovine myelin basic protein as a specific phosphorylation site for mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1990 Nov 15;265(32):19728–19735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Errede B., Gartner A., Zhou Z., Nasmyth K., Ammerer G. MAP kinase-related FUS3 from S. cerevisiae is activated by STE7 in vitro. Nature. 1993 Mar 18;362(6417):261–264. doi: 10.1038/362261a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Evan G. I., Lewis G. K., Ramsay G., Bishop J. M. Isolation of monoclonal antibodies specific for human c-myc proto-oncogene product. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Dec;5(12):3610–3616. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.12.3610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gartner A., Nasmyth K., Ammerer G. Signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires tyrosine and threonine phosphorylation of FUS3 and KSS1. Genes Dev. 1992 Jul;6(7):1280–1292. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.7.1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gietz D., St Jean A., Woods R. A., Schiestl R. H. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Mar 25;20(6):1425–1425. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.6.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hanks S. K., Hunter T. Protein kinases 6. The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. FASEB J. 1995 May;9(8):576–596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hasson M. S., Blinder D., Thorner J., Jenness D. D. Mutational activation of the STE5 gene product bypasses the requirement for G protein beta and gamma subunits in the yeast pheromone response pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1054–1065. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Herskowitz I. MAP kinase pathways in yeast: for mating and more. Cell. 1995 Jan 27;80(2):187–197. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90402-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hill C. S., Treisman R. Transcriptional regulation by extracellular signals: mechanisms and specificity. Cell. 1995 Jan 27;80(2):199–211. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90403-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hill J. E., Myers A. M., Koerner T. J., Tzagoloff A. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast. 1986 Sep;2(3):163–167. doi: 10.1002/yea.320020304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hsiao K. M., Chou S. Y., Shih S. J., Ferrell J. E., Jr Evidence that inactive p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase and inactive Rsk exist as a heterodimer in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 7;91(12):5480–5484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Huang W., Alessandrini A., Crews C. M., Erikson R. L. Raf-1 forms a stable complex with Mek1 and activates Mek1 by serine phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 1;90(23):10947–10951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.23.10947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jones D. H., Ley S., Aitken A. Isoforms of 14-3-3 protein can form homo- and heterodimers in vivo and in vitro: implications for function as adapter proteins. FEBS Lett. 1995 Jul 10;368(1):55–58. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00598-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jones E. W. Tackling the protease problem in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:428–453. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94034-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Julius D., Blair L., Brake A., Sprague G., Thorner J. Yeast alpha factor is processed from a larger precursor polypeptide: the essential role of a membrane-bound dipeptidyl aminopeptidase. Cell. 1983 Mar;32(3):839–852. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90070-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kallunki T., Su B., Tsigelny I., Sluss H. K., Dérijard B., Moore G., Davis R., Karin M. JNK2 contains a specificity-determining region responsible for efficient c-Jun binding and phosphorylation. Genes Dev. 1994 Dec 15;8(24):2996–3007. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.24.2996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Karin M. Signal transduction from the cell surface to the nucleus through the phosphorylation of transcription factors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;6(3):415–424. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90035-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kemp B. E., Parker M. W., Hu S., Tiganis T., House C. Substrate and pseudosubstrate interactions with protein kinases: determinants of specificity. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Nov;19(11):440–444. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90126-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kemp B. E., Pearson R. B. Protein kinase recognition sequence motifs. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990 Sep;15(9):342–346. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90073-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kennelly P. J., Krebs E. G. Consensus sequences as substrate specificity determinants for protein kinases and protein phosphatases. J Biol Chem. 1991 Aug 25;266(24):15555–15558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kurjan J. The pheromone response pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:147–179. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.001051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lee K. S., Irie K., Gotoh Y., Watanabe Y., Araki H., Nishida E., Matsumoto K., Levin D. E. A yeast mitogen-activated protein kinase homolog (Mpk1p) mediates signalling by protein kinase C. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 May;13(5):3067–3075. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.5.3067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Levin D. E., Errede B. The proliferation of MAP kinase signaling pathways in yeast. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995 Apr;7(2):197–202. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80028-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu H., Styles C. A., Fink G. R. Elements of the yeast pheromone response pathway required for filamentous growth of diploids. Science. 1993 Dec 10;262(5140):1741–1744. doi: 10.1126/science.8259520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ma D., Cook J. G., Thorner J. Phosphorylation and localization of Kss1, a MAP kinase of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response pathway. Mol Biol Cell. 1995 Jul;6(7):889–909. doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.7.889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Marcus S., Polverino A., Barr M., Wigler M. Complexes between STE5 and components of the pheromone-responsive mitogen-activated protein kinase module. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 2;91(16):7762–7766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Marshall C. J. Signal transduction. Hot lips and phosphorylation of protein kinases. Nature. 1994 Feb 24;367(6465):686–686. doi: 10.1038/367686a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Marshall C. J. Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell. 1995 Jan 27;80(2):179–185. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90401-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mayer B. J., Hirai H., Sakai R. Evidence that SH2 domains promote processive phosphorylation by protein-tyrosine kinases. Curr Biol. 1995 Mar 1;5(3):296–305. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Morgan D. O., De Bondt H. L. Protein kinase regulation: insights from crystal structure analysis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Apr;6(2):239–246. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90142-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Nakamaye K. L., Eckstein F. Inhibition of restriction endonuclease Nci I cleavage by phosphorothioate groups and its application to oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Dec 22;14(24):9679–9698. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.24.9679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Neiman A. M., Herskowitz I. Reconstitution of a yeast protein kinase cascade in vitro: activation of the yeast MEK homologue STE7 by STE11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3398–3402. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pawson T. Protein-tyrosine kinases. Getting down to specifics. Nature. 1995 Feb 9;373(6514):477–478. doi: 10.1038/373477a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Pelech S. L. Networking with protein kinases. Curr Biol. 1993 Aug 1;3(8):513–515. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(93)90043-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Peter M., Gartner A., Horecka J., Ammerer G., Herskowitz I. FAR1 links the signal transduction pathway to the cell cycle machinery in yeast. Cell. 1993 May 21;73(4):747–760. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90254-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Peter M., Herskowitz I. Direct inhibition of the yeast cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28-Cln by Far1. Science. 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1228–1231. doi: 10.1126/science.8066461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Phizicky E. M., Fields S. Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis. Microbiol Rev. 1995 Mar;59(1):94–123. doi: 10.1128/mr.59.1.94-123.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Printen J. A., Sprague G. F., Jr Protein-protein interactions in the yeast pheromone response pathway: Ste5p interacts with all members of the MAP kinase cascade. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):609–619. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Ramer S. W., Davis R. W. A dominant truncation allele identifies a gene, STE20, that encodes a putative protein kinase necessary for mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jan 15;90(2):452–456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.2.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Rao V. N., Reddy E. S. elk-1 proteins interact with MAP kinases. Oncogene. 1994 Jul;9(7):1855–1860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Reneke J. E., Blumer K. J., Courchesne W. E., Thorner J. The carboxy-terminal segment of the yeast alpha-factor receptor is a regulatory domain. Cell. 1988 Oct 21;55(2):221–234. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90045-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rhodes N., Connell L., Errede B. STE11 is a protein kinase required for cell-type-specific transcription and signal transduction in yeast. Genes Dev. 1990 Nov;4(11):1862–1874. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.11.1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Roberts R. L., Fink G. R. Elements of a single MAP kinase cascade in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mediate two developmental programs in the same cell type: mating and invasive growth. Genes Dev. 1994 Dec 15;8(24):2974–2985. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.24.2974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schultz J., Ferguson B., Sprague G. F., Jr Signal transduction and growth control in yeast. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Feb;5(1):31–37. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(95)90050-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Simon M. N., De Virgilio C., Souza B., Pringle J. R., Abo A., Reed S. I. Role for the Rho-family GTPase Cdc42 in yeast mating-pheromone signal pathway. Nature. 1995 Aug 24;376(6542):702–705. doi: 10.1038/376702a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Soler M., Plovins A., Martín H., Molina M., Nombela C. Characterization of domains in the yeast MAP kinase Slt2 (Mpk1) required for functional activity and in vivo interaction with protein kinases Mkk1 and Mkk2. Mol Microbiol. 1995 Sep;17(5):833–842. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17050833.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Song D., Dolan J. W., Yuan Y. L., Fields S. Pheromone-dependent phosphorylation of the yeast STE12 protein correlates with transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 1991 May;5(5):741–750. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.5.741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Songyang Z., Carraway K. L., 3rd, Eck M. J., Harrison S. C., Feldman R. A., Mohammadi M., Schlessinger J., Hubbard S. R., Smith D. P., Eng C. Catalytic specificity of protein-tyrosine kinases is critical for selective signalling. Nature. 1995 Feb 9;373(6514):536–539. doi: 10.1038/373536a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Sprague G. F., Jr Assay of yeast mating reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:77–93. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94008-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Stevenson B. J., Rhodes N., Errede B., Sprague G. F., Jr Constitutive mutants of the protein kinase STE11 activate the yeast pheromone response pathway in the absence of the G protein. Genes Dev. 1992 Jul;6(7):1293–1304. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.7.1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Taylor S. S., Knighton D. R., Zheng J., Ten Eyck L. F., Sowadski J. M. Structural framework for the protein kinase family. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1992;8:429–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.002241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Teague M. A., Chaleff D. T., Errede B. Nucleotide sequence of the yeast regulatory gene STE7 predicts a protein homologous to protein kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(19):7371–7375. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.19.7371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Toda T., Cameron S., Sass P., Zoller M., Wigler M. Three different genes in S. cerevisiae encode the catalytic subunits of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Cell. 1987 Jul 17;50(2):277–287. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90223-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Tyers M., Futcher B. Far1 and Fus3 link the mating pheromone signal transduction pathway to three G1-phase Cdc28 kinase complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;13(9):5659–5669. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.9.5659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Van Aelst L., Barr M., Marcus S., Polverino A., Wigler M. Complex formation between RAS and RAF and other protein kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 1;90(13):6213–6217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.13.6213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Whiteway M., Hougan L., Dignard D., Thomas D. Y., Bell L., Saari G. C., Grant F. J., O'Hara P., MacKay V. L. The STE4 and STE18 genes of yeast encode potential beta and gamma subunits of the mating factor receptor-coupled G protein. Cell. 1989 Feb 10;56(3):467–477. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90249-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wu C., Whiteway M., Thomas D. Y., Leberer E. Molecular characterization of Ste20p, a potential mitogen-activated protein or extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) kinase kinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jul 7;270(27):15984–15992. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.27.15984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Yashar B., Irie K., Printen J. A., Stevenson B. J., Sprague G. F., Jr, Matsumoto K., Errede B. Yeast MEK-dependent signal transduction: response thresholds and parameters affecting fidelity. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Dec;15(12):6545–6553. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.12.6545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Zhao Z. S., Leung T., Manser E., Lim L. Pheromone signalling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the small GTP-binding protein Cdc42p and its activator CDC24. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5246–5257. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Zheng C. F., Guan K. L. Properties of MEKs, the kinases that phosphorylate and activate the extracellular signal-regulated kinases. J Biol Chem. 1993 Nov 15;268(32):23933–23939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhou Z., Gartner A., Cade R., Ammerer G., Errede B. Pheromone-induced signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the sequential function of three protein kinases. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):2069–2080. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES