Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1996 Oct;16(10):5346–5357. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.10.5346

The human cut homeodomain protein can repress gene expression by two distinct mechanisms: active repression and competition for binding site occupancy.

F Mailly 1, G Bérubé 1, R Harada 1, P L Mao 1, S Phillips 1, A Nepveu 1
PMCID: PMC231533  PMID: 8816446

Abstract

By analogy with other homeodomain proteins conserved in evolution, mammalian Cut proteins are believed, as in Drosophila melanogaster, to play an important role in determining cell type specificity in several tissues. At the molecular level, Cut proteins appear to serve as transcriptional repressors. In this study, we have examined the mechanism by which the human Cut (hCut) protein down-regulates gene expression. The homeodomain and the three regions called Cut repeats are evolutionarily conserved and were previously shown to function as DNA binding domains. The carboxy-terminal region, although it does not show amino acid sequence homology per se, in all cases is enriched in alanine and proline residues, a distinctive feature of some transcriptional repression domains. Our results reveal two distinct modes of repression: competition for binding site occupancy and active repression. On one hand, the composite DNA binding domain formed by Cut repeat 3 and the Cut homeodomain was shown to bind to CCAAT and Sp1 sites within the tk gene promoter and to reduce gene expression, presumably by preventing activation by the corresponding transcription factors. On the other hand, the carboxy-terminal region of mammalian Cut proteins was found to function as an active repression domain in a distance-independent manner. We have further narrowed this activity to two subdomains that can independently repress activated transcription. Finally, we present a model to illustrate the two mechanisms by which Cut proteins repress gene expression.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (736.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andres V., Nadal-Ginard B., Mahdavi V. Clox, a mammalian homeobox gene related to Drosophila cut, encodes DNA-binding regulatory proteins differentially expressed during development. Development. 1992 Oct;116(2):321–334. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.2.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrés V., Chiara M. D., Mahdavi V. A new bipartite DNA-binding domain: cooperative interaction between the cut repeat and homeo domain of the cut homeo proteins. Genes Dev. 1994 Jan;8(2):245–257. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.2.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asselin C., Nepveu A., Marcu K. B. Molecular requirements for transcriptional initiation of the murine c-myc gene. Oncogene. 1989 May;4(5):549–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aufiero B., Neufeld E. J., Orkin S. H. Sequence-specific DNA binding of individual cut repeats of the human CCAAT displacement/cut homeodomain protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 2;91(16):7757–7761. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Austin R. J., Biggin M. D. A domain of the even-skipped protein represses transcription by preventing TFIID binding to a promoter: repression by cooperative blocking. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Sep;15(9):4683–4693. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.9.4683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barberis A., Superti-Furga G., Busslinger M. Mutually exclusive interaction of the CCAAT-binding factor and of a displacement protein with overlapping sequences of a histone gene promoter. Cell. 1987 Jul 31;50(3):347–359. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90489-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jack J., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Primary structure and expression of a product from cut, a locus involved in specifying sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):629–635. doi: 10.1038/333629a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Patterns of expression of cut, a protein required for external sensory organ development in wild-type and cut mutant Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1990 Aug;4(8):1322–1331. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.8.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blochlinger K., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Postembryonic patterns of expression of cut, a locus regulating sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Development. 1993 Feb;117(2):441–450. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.2.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blochlinger K., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Transformation of sensory organ identity by ectopic expression of Cut in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1124–1135. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bodmer R., Barbel S., Sheperd S., Jack J. W., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Transformation of sensory organs by mutations of the cut locus of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1987 Oct 23;51(2):293–307. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90156-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Briggs M. R., Kadonaga J. T., Bell S. P., Tjian R. Purification and biochemical characterization of the promoter-specific transcription factor, Sp1. Science. 1986 Oct 3;234(4772):47–52. doi: 10.1126/science.3529394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bunker C. A., Kingston R. E. Transcriptional repression by Drosophila and mammalian Polycomb group proteins in transfected mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Mar;14(3):1721–1732. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Catron K. M., Zhang H., Marshall S. C., Inostroza J. A., Wilson J. M., Abate C. Transcriptional repression by Msx-1 does not require homeodomain DNA-binding sites. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;15(2):861–871. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.2.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chodosh L. A., Baldwin A. S., Carthew R. W., Sharp P. A. Human CCAAT-binding proteins have heterologous subunits. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):11–24. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90483-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chodosh L. A., Olesen J., Hahn S., Baldwin A. S., Guarente L., Sharp P. A. A yeast and a human CCAAT-binding protein have heterologous subunits that are functionally interchangeable. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90484-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cowell I. G., Hurst H. C. Transcriptional repression by the human bZIP factor E4BP4: definition of a minimal repression domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jan 11;22(1):59–65. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cowell I. G. Repression versus activation in the control of gene transcription. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Jan;19(1):38–42. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90172-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. DesJardins E., Hay N. Repeated CT elements bound by zinc finger proteins control the absolute and relative activities of the two principal human c-myc promoters. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;13(9):5710–5724. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.9.5710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dorn A., Bollekens J., Staub A., Benoist C., Mathis D. A multiplicity of CCAAT box-binding proteins. Cell. 1987 Sep 11;50(6):863–872. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90513-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dufort D., Drolet M., Nepveu A. A protein binding site from the murine c-myc promoter contributes to transcriptional block. Oncogene. 1993 Jan;8(1):165–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dufort D., Nepveu A. The human cut homeodomain protein represses transcription from the c-myc promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):4251–4257. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.4251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dynan W. S., Tjian R. The promoter-specific transcription factor Sp1 binds to upstream sequences in the SV40 early promoter. Cell. 1983 Nov;35(1):79–87. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90210-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fondell J. D., Roy A. L., Roeder R. G. Unliganded thyroid hormone receptor inhibits formation of a functional preinitiation complex: implications for active repression. Genes Dev. 1993 Jul;7(7B):1400–1410. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.7b.1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Garcia-Bustos J., Heitman J., Hall M. N. Nuclear protein localization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Mar 7;1071(1):83–101. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(91)90013-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gorman C. M., Moffat L. F., Howard B. H. Recombinant genomes which express chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Sep;2(9):1044–1051. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.9.1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Graves B. J., Johnson P. F., McKnight S. L. Homologous recognition of a promoter domain common to the MSV LTR and the HSV tk gene. Cell. 1986 Feb 28;44(4):565–576. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90266-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Han K., Manley J. L. Functional domains of the Drosophila Engrailed protein. EMBO J. 1993 Jul;12(7):2723–2733. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05934.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Han K., Manley J. L. Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila even-skipped protein: definition of a minimal repression domain. Genes Dev. 1993 Mar;7(3):491–503. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.3.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Harada R., Bérubé G., Tamplin O. J., Denis-Larose C., Nepveu A. DNA-binding specificity of the cut repeats from the human cut-like protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jan;15(1):129–140. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.1.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Harada R., Dufort D., Denis-Larose C., Nepveu A. Conserved cut repeats in the human cut homeodomain protein function as DNA binding domains. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jan 21;269(3):2062–2067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Herbomel P., Bourachot B., Yaniv M. Two distinct enhancers with different cell specificities coexist in the regulatory region of polyoma. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):653–662. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90472-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Inouye C. J., Seto E. Relief of YY1-induced transcriptional repression by protein-protein interaction with the nucleolar phosphoprotein B23. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 4;269(9):6506–6510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jack J., Dorsett D., Delotto Y., Liu S. Expression of the cut locus in the Drosophila wing margin is required for cell type specification and is regulated by a distant enhancer. Development. 1991 Nov;113(3):735–747. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.3.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jaynes J. B., O'Farrell P. H. Active repression of transcription by the engrailed homeodomain protein. EMBO J. 1991 Jun;10(6):1427–1433. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07663.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Johnson A. D., Herskowitz I. A repressor (MAT alpha 2 Product) and its operator control expression of a set of cell type specific genes in yeast. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):237–247. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80119-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jones K. A., Yamamoto K. R., Tjian R. Two distinct transcription factors bind to the HSV thymidine kinase promoter in vitro. Cell. 1985 Sep;42(2):559–572. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90113-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kadonaga J. T., Carner K. R., Masiarz F. R., Tjian R. Isolation of cDNA encoding transcription factor Sp1 and functional analysis of the DNA binding domain. Cell. 1987 Dec 24;51(6):1079–1090. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90594-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kato G. J., Barrett J., Villa-Garcia M., Dang C. V. An amino-terminal c-myc domain required for neoplastic transformation activates transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5914–5920. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kozak M. Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):283–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee K. A., Bindereif A., Green M. R. A small-scale procedure for preparation of nuclear extracts that support efficient transcription and pre-mRNA splicing. Gene Anal Tech. 1988 Mar-Apr;5(2):22–31. doi: 10.1016/0735-0651(88)90023-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Licht J. D., Grossel M. J., Figge J., Hansen U. M. Drosophila Krüppel protein is a transcriptional repressor. Nature. 1990 Jul 5;346(6279):76–79. doi: 10.1038/346076a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Licht J. D., Hanna-Rose W., Reddy J. C., English M. A., Ro M., Grossel M., Shaknovich R., Hansen U. Mapping and mutagenesis of the amino-terminal transcriptional repression domain of the Drosophila Krüppel protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):4057–4066. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.4057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lievens P. M., Donady J. J., Tufarelli C., Neufeld E. J. Repressor activity of CCAAT displacement protein in HL-60 myeloid leukemia cells. J Biol Chem. 1995 May 26;270(21):12745–12750. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.21.12745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lillie J. W., Green M. R. Transcription activation by the adenovirus E1a protein. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):39–44. doi: 10.1038/338039a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu S., Jack J. Regulatory interactions and role in cell type specification of the Malpighian tubules by the cut, Krüppel, and caudal genes of Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1992 Mar;150(1):133–143. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu S., McLeod E., Jack J. Four distinct regulatory regions of the cut locus and their effect on cell type specification in Drosophila. Genetics. 1991 Jan;127(1):151–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Luckow B., Schütz G. CAT constructions with multiple unique restriction sites for the functional analysis of eukaryotic promoters and regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Jul 10;15(13):5490–5490. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.13.5490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Madden S. L., Cook D. M., Morris J. F., Gashler A., Sukhatme V. P., Rauscher F. J., 3rd Transcriptional repression mediated by the WT1 Wilms tumor gene product. Science. 1991 Sep 27;253(5027):1550–1553. doi: 10.1126/science.1654597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Madden S. L., Cook D. M., Rauscher F. J., 3rd A structure-function analysis of transcriptional repression mediated by the WT1, Wilms' tumor suppressor protein. Oncogene. 1993 Jul;8(7):1713–1720. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Martin K. J., Lillie J. W., Green M. R. Evidence for interaction of different eukaryotic transcriptional activators with distinct cellular targets. Nature. 1990 Jul 12;346(6280):147–152. doi: 10.1038/346147a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mastrangelo I. A., Courey A. J., Wall J. S., Jackson S. P., Hough P. V. DNA looping and Sp1 multimer links: a mechanism for transcriptional synergism and enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 1;88(13):5670–5674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.13.5670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. McCutchan J. H., Pagano J. S. Enchancement of the infectivity of simian virus 40 deoxyribonucleic acid with diethylaminoethyl-dextran. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1968 Aug;41(2):351–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Metz R., Bannister A. J., Sutherland J. A., Hagemeier C., O'Rourke E. C., Cook A., Bravo R., Kouzarides T. c-Fos-induced activation of a TATA-box-containing promoter involves direct contact with TATA-box-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Sep;14(9):6021–6029. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.9.6021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Neufeld E. J., Skalnik D. G., Lievens P. M., Orkin S. H. Human CCAAT displacement protein is homologous to the Drosophila homeoprotein, cut. Nat Genet. 1992 Apr;1(1):50–55. doi: 10.1038/ng0492-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rauscher F. J., 3rd Tumor suppressor genes which encode transcriptional repressors: studies on the EGR and Wilms' tumor (WT1) gene products. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1993;348:23–29. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2942-2_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sadowski I., Ptashne M. A vector for expressing GAL4(1-147) fusions in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Sep 25;17(18):7539–7539. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.18.7539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Saha S., Brickman J. M., Lehming N., Ptashne M. New eukaryotic transcriptional repressors. Nature. 1993 Jun 17;363(6430):648–652. doi: 10.1038/363648a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sauer F., Fondell J. D., Ohkuma Y., Roeder R. G., Jäckle H. Control of transcription by Krüppel through interactions with TFIIB and TFIIE beta. Nature. 1995 May 11;375(6527):162–164. doi: 10.1038/375162a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shi Y., Seto E., Chang L. S., Shenk T. Transcriptional repression by YY1, a human GLI-Krüppel-related protein, and relief of repression by adenovirus E1A protein. Cell. 1991 Oct 18;67(2):377–388. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Skalnik D. G., Strauss E. C., Orkin S. H. CCAAT displacement protein as a repressor of the myelomonocytic-specific gp91-phox gene promoter. J Biol Chem. 1991 Sep 5;266(25):16736–16744. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Su W., Jackson S., Tjian R., Echols H. DNA looping between sites for transcriptional activation: self-association of DNA-bound Sp1. Genes Dev. 1991 May;5(5):820–826. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.5.820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. TenHarmsel A., Austin R. J., Savenelli N., Biggin M. D. Cooperative binding at a distance by even-skipped protein correlates with repression and suggests a mechanism of silencing. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 May;13(5):2742–2752. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.5.2742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Um M., Li C., Manley J. L. The transcriptional repressor even-skipped interacts directly with TATA-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Sep;15(9):5007–5016. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.9.5007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Valarché I., Tissier-Seta J. P., Hirsch M. R., Martinez S., Goridis C., Brunet J. F. The mouse homeodomain protein Phox2 regulates Ncam promoter activity in concert with Cux/CDP and is a putative determinant of neurotransmitter phenotype. Development. 1993 Nov;119(3):881–896. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.3.881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wigler M., Pellicer A., Silverstein S., Axel R., Urlaub G., Chasin L. DNA-mediated transfer of the adenine phosphoribosyltransferase locus into mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Mar;76(3):1373–1376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Yeung K. C., Inostroza J. A., Mermelstein F. H., Kannabiran C., Reinberg D. Structure-function analysis of the TBP-binding protein Dr1 reveals a mechanism for repression of class II gene transcription. Genes Dev. 1994 Sep 1;8(17):2097–2109. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.17.2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Yoon S. O., Chikaraishi D. M. Isolation of two E-box binding factors that interact with the rat tyrosine hydroxylase enhancer. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jul 15;269(28):18453–18462. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zuo P., Stanojević D., Colgan J., Han K., Levine M., Manley J. L. Activation and repression of transcription by the gap proteins hunchback and Krüppel in cultured Drosophila cells. Genes Dev. 1991 Feb;5(2):254–264. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.2.254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES