Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1996 Nov;16(11):6263–6272. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.11.6263

The Gfi-1 proto-oncoprotein contains a novel transcriptional repressor domain, SNAG, and inhibits G1 arrest induced by interleukin-2 withdrawal.

H L Grimes 1, T O Chan 1, P A Zweidler-McKay 1, B Tong 1, P N Tsichlis 1
PMCID: PMC231629  PMID: 8887656

Abstract

The Gfi-1 proto-oncogene is activated by provirus insertion in T-cell lymphoma lines selected for interleukin-2 (IL-2) independence in culture and in primary retrovirus-induced thymomas and encodes a nuclear, sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. Here we show that Gfi-1 is a position- and orientation-independent active transcriptional repressor, whose activity depends on a 20-amino-acid N-terminal repressor domain, coincident with a nuclear localization motif. The sequence of the Gfi-1 repressor domain is related to the sequence of the repressor domain of Gfi-1B, a Gfi-1-related protein, and to sequences at the N termini of the insulinoma-associated protein, IA-1, the homeobox protein Gsh-1, and the vertebrate but not the Drosophila members of the Snail-Slug protein family (Snail/Gfi-1, SNAG domain). Although not functionally characterized, these SNAG-related sequences are also likely to mediate transcriptional repression. Therefore, the Gfi-1 SNAG domain may be the prototype of a novel family of evolutionarily conserved repressor domains that operate in multiple cell lineages. Gfi-1 overexpression in IL-2-dependent T-cell lines allows the cells to escape from the G1 arrest induced by IL-2 withdrawal. Since a single point mutation in the SNAG domain (P2A) inhibits both the Gfi-1-mediated transcriptional repression and the G1 arrest induced by IL-2 starvation, we conclude that the latter depends on the repressor activity of the SNAG domain. Induction of Gfi-1 may therefore contribute to T-cell activation and tumor progression by repressing the expression of genes that inhibit cellular proliferation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson S., Davis D. L., Dahlbäck H., Jörnvall H., Russell D. W. Cloning, structure, and expression of the mitochondrial cytochrome P-450 sterol 26-hydroxylase, a bile acid biosynthetic enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1989 May 15;264(14):8222–8229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baichwal V. R., Tjian R. Control of c-Jun activity by interaction of a cell-specific inhibitor with regulatory domain delta: differences between v- and c-Jun. Cell. 1990 Nov 16;63(4):815–825. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90147-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baniahmad A., Köhne A. C., Renkawitz R. A transferable silencing domain is present in the thyroid hormone receptor, in the v-erbA oncogene product and in the retinoic acid receptor. EMBO J. 1992 Mar;11(3):1015–1023. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05140.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell D. W., Taguchi T., Jenkins N. A., Gilbert D. J., Copeland N. G., Gilks C. B., Zweidler-McKay P., Grimes H. L., Tsichlis P. N., Testa J. R. Chromosomal localization of a gene, GF1, encoding a novel zinc finger protein reveals a new syntenic region between man and rodents. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1995;70(3-4):263–267. doi: 10.1159/000134048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berns A., van der Lugt N., Alkema M., van Lohuizen M., Domen J., Acton D., Allen J., Laird P. W., Jonkers J. Mouse model systems to study multistep tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1994;59:435–447. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1994.059.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bignon C., Daniel N., Djiane J. Beta-galactosidase and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase assays in 96-well plates. Biotechniques. 1993 Aug;15(2):243–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brent R., Ptashne M. A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):729–736. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bunker C. A., Kingston R. E. Transcriptional repression by Drosophila and mammalian Polycomb group proteins in transfected mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Mar;14(3):1721–1732. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cowell I. G., Hurst H. C. Transcriptional repression by the human bZIP factor E4BP4: definition of a minimal repression domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jan 11;22(1):59–65. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crabtree G. R. Contingent genetic regulatory events in T lymphocyte activation. Science. 1989 Jan 20;243(4889):355–361. doi: 10.1126/science.2783497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Deng W. P., Nickoloff J. A. Site-directed mutagenesis of virtually any plasmid by eliminating a unique site. Anal Biochem. 1992 Jan;200(1):81–88. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90280-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gilks C. B., Bear S. E., Grimes H. L., Tsichlis P. N. Progression of interleukin-2 (IL-2)-dependent rat T cell lymphoma lines to IL-2-independent growth following activation of a gene (Gfi-1) encoding a novel zinc finger protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Mar;13(3):1759–1768. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.3.1759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gill G., Ptashne M. Negative effect of the transcriptional activator GAL4. Nature. 1988 Aug 25;334(6184):721–724. doi: 10.1038/334721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gray S., Levine M. Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1996 Mar 15;10(6):700–710. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.6.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gyuris J., Golemis E., Chertkov H., Brent R. Cdi1, a human G1 and S phase protein phosphatase that associates with Cdk2. Cell. 1993 Nov 19;75(4):791–803. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90498-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Han K., Manley J. L. Functional domains of the Drosophila Engrailed protein. EMBO J. 1993 Jul;12(7):2723–2733. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05934.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jaynes J. B., O'Farrell P. H. Active repression of transcription by the engrailed homeodomain protein. EMBO J. 1991 Jun;10(6):1427–1433. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07663.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson A. D. The price of repression. Cell. 1995 Jun 2;81(5):655–658. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90524-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kalderon D., Roberts B. L., Richardson W. D., Smith A. E. A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):499–509. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90457-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kosman D., Ip Y. T., Levine M., Arora K. Establishment of the mesoderm-neuroectoderm boundary in the Drosophila embryo. Science. 1991 Oct 4;254(5028):118–122. doi: 10.1126/science.1925551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lan M. S., Russell E. K., Lu J., Johnson B. E., Notkins A. L. IA-1, a new marker for neuroendocrine differentiation in human lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 1993 Sep 15;53(18):4169–4171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Landau N. R., Littman D. R. Packaging system for rapid production of murine leukemia virus vectors with variable tropism. J Virol. 1992 Aug;66(8):5110–5113. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.8.5110-5113.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leptin M. twist and snail as positive and negative regulators during Drosophila mesoderm development. Genes Dev. 1991 Sep;5(9):1568–1576. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.9.1568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li H., Zeitler P. S., Valerius M. T., Small K., Potter S. S. Gsh-1, an orphan Hox gene, is required for normal pituitary development. EMBO J. 1996 Feb 15;15(4):714–724. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liao X., Buchberg A. M., Jenkins N. A., Copeland N. G. Evi-5, a common site of retroviral integration in AKXD T-cell lymphomas, maps near Gfi-1 on mouse chromosome 5. J Virol. 1995 Nov;69(11):7132–7137. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.11.7132-7137.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Licht J. D., Hanna-Rose W., Reddy J. C., English M. A., Ro M., Grossel M., Shaknovich R., Hansen U. Mapping and mutagenesis of the amino-terminal transcriptional repression domain of the Drosophila Krüppel protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):4057–4066. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.4057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luckow B., Schütz G. CAT constructions with multiple unique restriction sites for the functional analysis of eukaryotic promoters and regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Jul 10;15(13):5490–5490. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.13.5490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma J., Ptashne M. The carboxy-terminal 30 amino acids of GAL4 are recognized by GAL80. Cell. 1987 Jul 3;50(1):137–142. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90670-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Madden S. L., Cook D. M., Rauscher F. J., 3rd A structure-function analysis of transcriptional repression mediated by the WT1, Wilms' tumor suppressor protein. Oncogene. 1993 Jul;8(7):1713–1720. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Margolin J. F., Friedman J. R., Meyer W. K., Vissing H., Thiesen H. J., Rauscher F. J., 3rd Krüppel-associated boxes are potent transcriptional repression domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 10;91(10):4509–4513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Matheny C., Day M. L., Milbrandt J. The nuclear localization signal of NGFI-A is located within the zinc finger DNA binding domain. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 18;269(11):8176–8181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schreiber-Agus N., Chin L., Chen K., Torres R., Rao G., Guida P., Skoultchi A. I., DePinho R. A. An amino-terminal domain of Mxi1 mediates anti-Myc oncogenic activity and interacts with a homolog of the yeast transcriptional repressor SIN3. Cell. 1995 Mar 10;80(5):777–786. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90356-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sherley J. L., Kelly T. J. Regulation of human thymidine kinase during the cell cycle. J Biol Chem. 1988 Jun 15;263(17):8350–8358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shi Y., Seto E., Chang L. S., Shenk T. Transcriptional repression by YY1, a human GLI-Krüppel-related protein, and relief of repression by adenovirus E1A protein. Cell. 1991 Oct 18;67(2):377–388. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zweidler-Mckay P. A., Grimes H. L., Flubacher M. M., Tsichlis P. N. Gfi-1 encodes a nuclear zinc finger protein that binds DNA and functions as a transcriptional repressor. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Aug;16(8):4024–4034. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.8.4024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES