Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Jan;17(1):182–189. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.1.182

The activity of the scs and scs' insulator elements is not dependent on chromosomal context.

M Dunaway 1, J Y Hwang 1, M Xiong 1, H L Yuen 1
PMCID: PMC231742  PMID: 8972198

Abstract

Sequence elements that protect a reporter gene from chromosomal position effects or that block enhancer-activated transcription are called insulators. Using a plasmid-based microinjection assay with Xenopus laevis oocytes, we show that the heterologous Drosophila melanogaster scs and scs' insulator elements do not require chromosomal context to block enhancer-activated transcription. A single insulator element partially blocks enhancer-activated transcription, indicating that each element operates independently rather than as part of a pair. Deletion analysis of the 1.8-kb scs element identified a 220-bp fragment from one of the DNase I-hypersensitive regions that has full blocking activity in the oocyte assay. This fragment corresponds to the critical region of the scs mapped in previous studies with Drosophila. A time course of transcription shows that the scs blocks enhancer-activated transcription as early as transcription can be detected, about 30 min after injection. Complete assembly of the DNA template into nucleosomes requires 4 h. The scs and scs' sequences do not block site-specific recombination by FLP recombinase, implying that insulators do not operate by a general mechanism that physically sequesters the DNA. These data are most consistent with a model for insulator action in which direct interaction between the insulator and either the enhancer or promoter confers directionality to enhancer-activated transcription.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (337.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonifer C., Bosch F. X., Faust N., Schuhmann A., Sippel A. E. Evolution of gene regulation as revealed by differential regulation of the chicken lysozyme transgene and the endogenous mouse lysozyme gene in mouse macrophages. Eur J Biochem. 1994 Nov 15;226(1):227–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb20045.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonifer C., Yannoutsos N., Krüger G., Grosveld F., Sippel A. E. Dissection of the locus control function located on the chicken lysozyme gene domain in transgenic mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Oct 11;22(20):4202–4210. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.20.4202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cai H., Levine M. Modulation of enhancer-promoter interactions by insulators in the Drosophila embryo. Nature. 1995 Aug 10;376(6540):533–536. doi: 10.1038/376533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung J. H., Whiteley M., Felsenfeld G. A 5' element of the chicken beta-globin domain serves as an insulator in human erythroid cells and protects against position effect in Drosophila. Cell. 1993 Aug 13;74(3):505–514. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80052-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Craigie R., Mizuuchi K. Role of DNA topology in Mu transposition: mechanism of sensing the relative orientation of two DNA segments. Cell. 1986 Jun 20;45(6):793–800. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90554-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunaway M., Dröge P. Transactivation of the Xenopus rRNA gene promoter by its enhancer. Nature. 1989 Oct 19;341(6243):657–659. doi: 10.1038/341657a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dunaway M. Inhibition of topoisomerase II does not inhibit transcription of RNA polymerase I and II genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;10(6):2893–2900. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.6.2893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Farkas G., Udvardy A. Sequence of scs and scs' Drosophila DNA fragments with boundary function in the control of gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 May 25;20(10):2604–2604. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.10.2604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Felsenfeld G. Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism. Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):219–224. doi: 10.1038/355219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gerasimova T. I., Gdula D. A., Gerasimov D. V., Simonova O., Corces V. G. A Drosophila protein that imparts directionality on a chromatin insulator is an enhancer of position-effect variegation. Cell. 1995 Aug 25;82(4):587–597. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90031-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Geyer P. K., Corces V. G. DNA position-specific repression of transcription by a Drosophila zinc finger protein. Genes Dev. 1992 Oct;6(10):1865–1873. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.10.1865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glover D. M., Leibowitz M. H., McLean D. A., Parry H. Mutations in aurora prevent centrosome separation leading to the formation of monopolar spindles. Cell. 1995 Apr 7;81(1):95–105. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90374-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Golic K. G., Lindquist S. The FLP recombinase of yeast catalyzes site-specific recombination in the Drosophila genome. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):499–509. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90033-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holdridge C., Dorsett D. Repression of hsp70 heat shock gene transcription by the suppressor of hairy-wing protein of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Apr;11(4):1894–1900. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.4.1894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kellum R., Schedl P. A group of scs elements function as domain boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 May;12(5):2424–2431. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.5.2424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kellum R., Schedl P. A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains. Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):941–950. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90318-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Labhart P., Reeder R. H. Enhancer-like properties of the 60/81 bp elements in the ribosomal gene spacer of Xenopus laevis. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):285–289. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90324-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Labhart P., Reeder R. H. Xenopus ribosomal gene enhancers function when inserted inside the gene they enhance. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Dec 20;13(24):8999–9009. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.24.8999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McLeod M., Volkert F., Broach J. Components of the site-specific recombination system encoded by the yeast plasmid 2-micron circle. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:779–787. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. O'Gorman S., Fox D. T., Wahl G. M. Recombinase-mediated gene activation and site-specific integration in mammalian cells. Science. 1991 Mar 15;251(4999):1351–1355. doi: 10.1126/science.1900642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Saldanha R., Flanagan P., Fennewald M. Recombination by resolvase is inhibited by lac repressor simultaneously binding operators between res sites. J Mol Biol. 1987 Aug 5;196(3):505–516. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shore D., Langowski J., Baldwin R. L. DNA flexibility studied by covalent closure of short fragments into circles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Aug;78(8):4833–4837. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.8.4833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stark W. M., Boocock M. R., Sherratt D. J. Catalysis by site-specific recombinases. Trends Genet. 1992 Dec;8(12):432–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stief A., Winter D. M., Strätling W. H., Sippel A. E. A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature. 1989 Sep 28;341(6240):343–345. doi: 10.1038/341343a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Udvardy A., Maine E., Schedl P. The 87A7 chromomere. Identification of novel chromatin structures flanking the heat shock locus that may define the boundaries of higher order domains. J Mol Biol. 1985 Sep 20;185(2):341–358. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90408-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vazquez J., Schedl P. Sequences required for enhancer blocking activity of scs are located within two nuclease-hypersensitive regions. EMBO J. 1994 Dec 15;13(24):5984–5993. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06944.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhao K., Hart C. M., Laemmli U. K. Visualization of chromosomal domains with boundary element-associated factor BEAF-32. Cell. 1995 Jun 16;81(6):879–889. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES