Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Jan;17(1):278–286. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.1.278

Influence of DNA sequence identity on efficiency of targeted gene replacement.

M T Negritto 1, X Wu 1, T Kuo 1, S Chu 1, A M Bailis 1
PMCID: PMC231752  PMID: 8972208

Abstract

We have developed a system for analyzing recombination between a DNA fragment released in the nucleus from a single-copy plasmid and a genomic target in order to determine the influence of DNA sequence mismatches on the frequency of gene replacement in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mismatching was shown to be a potent barrier to efficient gene replacement, but its effect was considerably ameliorated by the presence of DNA sequences that are identical to the genomic target at one end of a chimeric DNA fragment. Disruption of the mismatch repair gene MSH2 greatly reduces but does not eliminate the barrier to recombination between mismatched DNA fragment and genomic target sequences, indicating that the inhibition of gene replacement with mismatched sequences is at least partially under the control of mismatch repair. We also found that mismatched sequences inhibited recombination between a DNA fragment and the genome only when they were close to the edge of the fragment. Together these data indicate that while mismatches can destabilize the relationship between a DNA fragment and a genomic target sequence, they will only do so if they are likely to be in the heteroduplex formed between the recombining molecules.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (257.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alani E., Chi N. W., Kolodner R. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 protein specifically binds to duplex oligonucleotides containing mismatched DNA base pairs and insertions. Genes Dev. 1995 Jan 15;9(2):234–247. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.2.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alani E., Reenan R. A., Kolodner R. D. Interaction between mismatch repair and genetic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):19–39. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailis A. M., Arthur L., Rothstein R. Genome rearrangement in top3 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a functional RAD1 excision repair gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;12(11):4988–4993. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.11.4988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailis A. M., Maines S., Negritto M. T. The essential helicase gene RAD3 suppresses short-sequence recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;15(8):3998–4008. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.8.3998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bailis A. M., Rothstein R. A defect in mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stimulates ectopic recombination between homeologous genes by an excision repair dependent process. Genetics. 1990 Nov;126(3):535–547. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christianson T. W., Sikorski R. S., Dante M., Shero J. H., Hieter P. Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene. 1992 Jan 2;110(1):119–122. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90454-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Datta A., Adjiri A., New L., Crouse G. F., Jinks Robertson S. Mitotic crossovers between diverged sequences are regulated by mismatch repair proteins in Saccaromyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Mar;16(3):1085–1093. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.3.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deng C., Capecchi M. R. Reexamination of gene targeting frequency as a function of the extent of homology between the targeting vector and the target locus. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Aug;12(8):3365–3371. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.8.3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feinstein S. I., Low K. B. Hyper-recombining recipient strains in bacterial conjugation. Genetics. 1986 May;113(1):13–33. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fishman-Lobell J., Haber J. E. Removal of nonhomologous DNA ends in double-strand break recombination: the role of the yeast ultraviolet repair gene RAD1. Science. 1992 Oct 16;258(5081):480–484. doi: 10.1126/science.1411547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harris S., Rudnicki K. S., Haber J. E. Gene conversions and crossing over during homologous and homeologous ectopic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoffman C. S., Winston F. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1987;57(2-3):267–272. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jensen R. E., Herskowitz I. Directionality and regulation of cassette substitution in yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:97–104. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuchino Y., Hanyu N., Tashiro F., Nishimura S. Tetrahymena thermophila glutamine tRNA and its gene that corresponds to UAA termination codon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(14):4758–4762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.14.4758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Matic I., Rayssiguier C., Radman M. Interspecies gene exchange in bacteria: the role of SOS and mismatch repair systems in evolution of species. Cell. 1995 Feb 10;80(3):507–515. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90501-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McDonald J. P., Rothstein R. Unrepaired heteroduplex DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is decreased in RAD1 RAD52-independent recombination. Genetics. 1994 Jun;137(2):393–405. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.2.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McGill C., Shafer B., Strathern J. Coconversion of flanking sequences with homothallic switching. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):459–467. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90921-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miret J. J., Milla M. G., Lahue R. S. Characterization of a DNA mismatch-binding activity in yeast extracts. J Biol Chem. 1993 Feb 15;268(5):3507–3513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Modrich P. Mechanisms and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:229–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.001305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mézard C., Pompon D., Nicolas A. Recombination between similar but not identical DNA sequences during yeast transformation occurs within short stretches of identity. Cell. 1992 Aug 21;70(4):659–670. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90434-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nickoloff J. A., Chen E. Y., Heffron F. A 24-base-pair DNA sequence from the MAT locus stimulates intergenic recombination in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7831–7835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Petit M. A., Dimpfl J., Radman M., Echols H. Control of large chromosomal duplications in Escherichia coli by the mismatch repair system. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):327–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Prolla T. A., Pang Q., Alani E., Kolodner R. D., Liskay R. M. MLH1, PMS1, and MSH2 interactions during the initiation of DNA mismatch repair in yeast. Science. 1994 Aug 19;265(5175):1091–1093. doi: 10.1126/science.8066446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ray B. L., White C. I., Haber J. E. Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the "stuck" mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):5372–5380. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rayssiguier C., Thaler D. S., Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989 Nov 23;342(6248):396–401. doi: 10.1038/342396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Reenan R. A., Kolodner R. D. Isolation and characterization of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding homologs of the bacterial HexA and MutS mismatch repair proteins. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):963–973. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Resnick M. A., Zgaga Z., Hieter P., Westmoreland J., Fogel S., Nilsson-Tillgren T. Recombinant repair of diverged DNAs: a study of homoeologous chromosomes and mammalian YACs in yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Jul;234(1):65–73. doi: 10.1007/BF00272346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rothstein R. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:281–301. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Selva E. M., New L., Crouse G. F., Lahue R. S. Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1175–1188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shen P., Huang H. V. Effect of base pair mismatches on recombination via the RecBCD pathway. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Aug;218(2):358–360. doi: 10.1007/BF00331291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shen P., Huang H. V. Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: dependence on substrate length and homology. Genetics. 1986 Mar;112(3):441–457. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.3.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shero J. H., Koval M., Spencer F., Palmer R. E., Hieter P., Koshland D. Analysis of chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:749–773. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94057-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sikorski R. S., Boeke J. D. In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:302–318. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smithies O., Gregg R. G., Boggs S. S., Koralewski M. A., Kucherlapati R. S. Insertion of DNA sequences into the human chromosomal beta-globin locus by homologous recombination. Nature. 1985 Sep 19;317(6034):230–234. doi: 10.1038/317230a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Smolik-Utlaut S., Petes T. D. Recombination of plasmids into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome is reduced by small amounts of sequence heterogeneity. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;3(7):1204–1211. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.7.1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sung P., Reynolds P., Prakash L., Prakash S. Purification and characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD1/RAD10 endonuclease. J Biol Chem. 1993 Dec 15;268(35):26391–26399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Supply P., de Kerchove d'Exaerde A., Roganti T., Goffeau A., Foury F. In-frame recombination between the yeast H(+)-ATPase isogenes PMA1 and PMA2: insights into the mechanism of recombination initiated by a double-strand break. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5389–5395. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Symington L. S., Petes T. D. Expansions and contractions of the genetic map relative to the physical map of yeast chromosome III. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;8(2):595–604. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Thomas D., Rothstein R., Rosenberg N., Surdin-Kerjan Y. SAM2 encodes the second methionine S-adenosyl transferase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: physiology and regulation of both enzymes. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5132–5139. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thomas K. R., Capecchi M. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):503–512. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90646-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tomkinson A. E., Bardwell A. J., Bardwell L., Tappe N. J., Friedberg E. C. Yeast DNA repair and recombination proteins Rad1 and Rad10 constitute a single-stranded-DNA endonuclease. Nature. 1993 Apr 29;362(6423):860–862. doi: 10.1038/362860a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Dependence of intrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells on uninterrupted homology. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5350–5357. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Williamson M. S., Game J. C., Fogel S. Meiotic gene conversion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and characterization of pms1-1 and pms1-2. Genetics. 1985 Aug;110(4):609–646. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.4.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Worth L., Jr, Clark S., Radman M., Modrich P. Mismatch repair proteins MutS and MutL inhibit RecA-catalyzed strand transfer between diverged DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3238–3241. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zahrt T. C., Mora G. C., Maloy S. Inactivation of mismatch repair overcomes the barrier to transduction between Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella typhi. J Bacteriol. 1994 Mar;176(5):1527–1529. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.5.1527-1529.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. de Wind N., Dekker M., Berns A., Radman M., te Riele H. Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer. Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):321–330. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90319-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. te Riele H., Maandag E. R., Berns A. Highly efficient gene targeting in embryonic stem cells through homologous recombination with isogenic DNA constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 1;89(11):5128–5132. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.11.5128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES